Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why can't we get straight answers about Discovery?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
OrlandoGator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-05 11:03 PM
Original message
Why can't we get straight answers about Discovery?
First, the foam came off the ET and didn't strike the shuttle.

Then, it the foam struck the shuttle but caused no damage.

Then, there was damage, but it wasn't severe enough to abort the mission.

Then (while we were told the damage wasn't severe) the astronauts practiced the repair procedures.

Then Atlantis is rolled out and a four-man crew is prepped for a rescue mission.

Now, the cloth that insulates between the tiles is loose and they are prepping for a spacewalk repair.

Am I the only one wondering exactly what the hell is going on? Has NASA been infected with the Bush administration's "lie until you can't lie anymore" syndrome?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
candy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-05 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Methinks Discovery is in big trouble--I sure wouldn't be looking forward
to the return trip.

Houston,we have problems----lots of problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Colors Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-05 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well you know....
Someone made a thread a few days ago pondering something along the lines that perhaps something was "done" to the shuttle and that person seemed to be attacked by most of the other users on here as having tinfoil hat syndrome.

Well, wouldn't either a disastrous re-entry or a miraculously launched "rescue mission" serve as a nice diversion for the MSM to get the Rove/Plame story out of the headlines for a little while?

Not to be cynical or anything but I put nothing past the * WH at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. I have been thinking that they wanted a disaster
to take the media attention away. They sure rushed to launch. I think that they would love to have a "rescue Mission" full of Hollywood imagery. What a way to stoke up the old patriotism. However, a rescue mission might not suck up enough media cycles unless they start soon.

By the way, I put absolutely NOTHING past any of them. In fact, I have to remind myself that for them NOTHING is unthinkable if it helps them in any way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfkrfk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. which of the two Nasa spokesmen is saying this?
Cheech or Chong?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
4. The Torment Of The Crew's Family
That's all I can think about. Just on face value...the fact that future missions were already scrubbed while this one is still has to be horrifying to the family and friends.

I remember Apollo 13...the concern during that flight and how it really did bring a nation together in a time which was very devisive (few remember this came right on the heels of Kent State & The Cambodian invasion). I'm very concerned here.

Even if there's damage, the least NASA could have done is waiting til the mission is over to decide about future missions. If there's a peril here, tell us. Don't let us find out like the last time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RONSTOO Donating Member (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
5. no matter what
theyll be safe, either we or the Russians can rescue them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Unless NASA decides the shuttle can handle reentry
and it can't. It's hardly an improbable scenario.

To say that my confidence in the shuttle program is at low ebb would be a bit of an understatement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unforgiven Donating Member (613 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
7. Because
when it falls apart comming back to land, it will be 'the' news story to take over for the Aruba news story. We can then blame it on terrorists at NASA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
8. I never believed the admin wanted them to fail.. but..
I do believe that there was pressure on NASA from within and from the White House to produce a space flight.. not as a diversion, but as a feel-good event for the Country. Remember when Bush was in the ratings basement before 9/11? He proposed going to Mars.

I am worried about Discovery. I hope they make it home safe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 01:59 AM
Response to Original message
9. because they're screwed and don't want to admit it
Wow, Bushler has every government agency in the country lying through their teeth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newportdadde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
11. I think the question is "Would egos allow a rescue?"
if in fact the shuttle is somewhat damaged but 'might' be okay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
12. I too have been wondering what is really going on
I said a few days ago that it looks to me like there is a plan here. I don't think they wanted it to fail, but I think we are going to be introduced to something soon.
I don't really feel it is a tinfoil hat situation, but I am wondering if maybe we will be introduced to a new kind of shuttle or something very soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC