Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OUTRAGE: SC nominee John G. Roberts tried to CURTAIL civil rights

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 12:38 AM
Original message
OUTRAGE: SC nominee John G. Roberts tried to CURTAIL civil rights
I am just beyond words.

=====

In the early 1980s, a young intellectual lawyer named John G. Roberts Jr. was part of the vanguard of a conservative political revolution in civil rights, advocating new legal theories and helping enforce the Reagan administration's effort to curtail the use of courts to remedy racial and sexual discrimination.

Just 26 when he joined the Justice Department as a special assistant to Attorney General William French Smith, Roberts was almost immediately entrusted to counsel senior department officials on such incendiary matters of the day as school desegregation, voting rules and government antidotes to bias in housing and hiring.

In prolific missives of a few pages and densely-written 30-page legal memos, Roberts -- whose co-workers recall had primary responsibility for civil rights matters in his office -- consistently sought to bolster the legal reasoning for the administration's new stances and to burnish its presentation of the policies to Congress and the public.

Roberts's record is being closely scrutinized and Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee say they will rigorously question the Supreme Court nominee on his views of civil rights. A review of Roberts's papers from his time at the Justice Department and interviews with his contemporaries show he was deeply involved with the Reagan administration's efforts to recast the way government and the courts approached civil rights.....

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8770914

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. watch what our democratic representatives do
this will tell us what we are up against
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. "a band of ideological brothers"
so much for fairness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. Just imagine what he will do to women's rights n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. anti-roe; anti title IX
we are moving backwards
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
4. The New Yorker reported last year on the Federalist Society
in a scathing indictment of their "views" on "voting rights". Clearly, they have engaged in egregious voter suppression in Fulton County, GA and elsewhere and Ashcroft set up the "Voting Rights" department at Justice just to further their efforts. It is, in fact, headed up by a member of the Federalist Society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. more on federalist society
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 01:36 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Hell, just read this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. WOW!!
protect the rights of white voters? i have no words but WOW!!:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 03:00 AM
Response to Original message
9. The Federalist Society are Klansmen in judges' robes
The mere nomination of this fascist bigot for the SCOTUS is an act of terrorism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapphire Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 03:23 AM
Response to Original message
10. The Record of John G. Roberts, Jr.: A Preliminary Report
There is so much more to Roberts than his anti-choice stance... here's some background...

http://www.savethecourt.org/atf/cf/{655C1FEB-1AAE-40BF-B630-DC0CEBFFA9ED}/stc-banner.jpg

The Record of John G. Roberts, Jr.: A Preliminary Report

This preliminary report provides a summary of the record of John Roberts, who has been a judge for less than two years, having been nominated by President George W. Bush to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and confirmed in May 2003. In compiling this report, we have examined Roberts’s pre-judicial record as well as his limited record on the bench, focusing primarily on cases raising concerns with respect to civil rights and individual liberties.

Overview

Roberts’s record is a disturbing one. Among other things, Roberts is hostile to women’s reproductive freedom, and he has taken positions in religious liberty and free speech cases that were detrimental to those fundamental rights. Roberts has limited judicial experience, but even his short tenure as a judge raises serious concerns about his ideology and judicial philosophy. For example, dissenting opinions by Roberts have questioned the constitutionality of the Endangered Species Act and argued that Americans tortured by Iraq when it was a terrorist state can receive no compensation. This preliminary review of Roberts’s record indicates that it falls far short of demonstrating the commitment to fundamental civil and constitutional rights that should be shown by a Supreme Court nominee.

Background

Judge Roberts was born in Buffalo, New York, in 1955. He received his law degree from Harvard Law School, and then clerked for Judge Henry Friendly on the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, and for then-Associate Justice William Rehnquist. Following his clerkships, Roberts worked in the Reagan Administration, first as a Special Assistant to Attorney General William French Smith (August 1981-November 1982), and then as Associate Counsel to the President (November 1982-May 1986). Roberts then entered private practice as an associate at Hogan & Hartson, where he became a partner in 1987. He left the firm in October 1989 to serve in the Administration of President George H.W. Bush as the Principal Deputy Solicitor General, also called the “political” Deputy. This position had been created during the Reagan Administration so that, if the Solicitor General “had to remove himself from a case . . . he could defer to a manager whom the Administration trusted.”<1> In this position Roberts was able personally to influence the legal decisions and positions taken by the Administration. Roberts left the Solicitor General’s office in January 1993 and returned to Hogan & Hartson, where he was a partner until his confirmation to the D.C. Circuit.

Click the links below to jump to a specific topic:

Reproductive Freedom

Religious Liberty

Free Speech

Federalism, "States Rights," and the Environment

Individual Rights

Access to Justice

Protecting the Federal Treasury


More @ http://www.savethecourt.org/site/c.mwK0JbNTJrF/b.897925/k.7742/A_Look_at_John_Roberts.htm



And if you haven't yet signed them...

DU Activist Corps, July 21, 2005 -- Supreme Court Petitions: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=106x19442

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC