Santorum's inability to name more than two Feminists
bleedingheart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-01-05 06:58 AM
Original message |
Santorum's inability to name more than two Feminists |
|
If you truly believe that an individual or a movement is to blame for the "destruction of the family"...wouldn't you know at least the name of perhaps 2-5 people at the forefront of that movement? If you claimed to be an expert you would more than likely know the names of more than 10...
You would know everything about them...and be able to dissect their lives and point out contradictions and the evils that they have created....but the dumb jerk couldn't even do that...
However...he is living proof that if the GOP makes something up and keeps repeating it over and over again...it all of a sudden becomes the truth.
|
hobbit709
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-01-05 07:03 AM
Response to Original message |
|
They don't need no stinkin' facts.
|
Tesla
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-01-05 07:06 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. They just say what they want, and the sheeple just believe it |
|
and Don't Ask Questions!!!
|
bobbieinok
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-01-05 07:13 AM
Response to Original message |
3. so if there are only 2, how can they be such a threat? or wow they are |
|
incredibly powerful
there is a theory that men suppress women because they completely fear the power of a woman who is not controlled by a man
this is very clear in Rousseau's writings about women
BTW, I was stunned when I first read in grad school that this philosopher who was supposed to be so liberating etc applied his views only to males......boys were to be educated for what they were best suited for after their personalities and abilities had been carefully studied.......BUT ALL girls were to receive the identical education; that is, girls were only to be educated to be pleasing to men
|
bleedingheart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-01-05 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. the only one he could name was Gloria Steinem...she must be POWERFUL |
|
to have been a threat to the entire country and the American family.
I do believe that Santorum is threatened by women who can think for themselves.
|
bobbieinok
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-01-05 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. and she isn't very active anymore, is she?? OTOH, she did |
|
start MS magazine, which got the 'feminist agenda' to all of the US
|
bleedingheart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-01-05 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
10. yeah those magazines that people voluntarily must buy before |
|
they can be brainwashed...
|
flyarm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-01-05 07:15 AM
Response to Original message |
4. i only heard him name one.. |
|
gloria!!!
he stumbled and spit all over himself...and i only heard him name gloria s.!
|
bleedingheart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-01-05 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. I watched that as well and just found it laughable.... |
FuzzyDicePHL
(698 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-01-05 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
Stephanopoulos yesterday (haven't watched it yet)?
|
bleedingheart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-01-05 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
in my opinion both the questions on feminism and the liberals in Boston really pointed out what an idiot Santorum is...
|
FuzzyDicePHL
(698 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-01-05 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
|
and man, what a scumsucker Sphinctorum is -- and a dumbass to boot.
|
Ian David
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-01-05 07:23 AM
Response to Original message |
7. I bet you Santorum could name more than 2 gay male pornstars! |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:35 AM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.