Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Steven C Clemons of "The Washington Note" on Bolton

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 07:56 PM
Original message
Steven C Clemons of "The Washington Note" on Bolton
As many of you are aware Steven Clemons and colleagues have done a remarkable service for all of us in their unblinking, rigorous efforts to prevent Mad-Dog Bolton from ever representing the United States of America at the United Nations.

I am posting segments of three items that appeared today at TWN as a statement of gratitude and encouragement to Mr Clemons and his colleagues and for your reading pleasure.

George Bush's Bolton Mistake

August 1, 2005

First of all, the guest bloggers on TWN have been stimulating, provocative, and very much worth reading. Thanks to all during these few days I am away.

But I am away, and the White House as all of you know has appointed someone to the United Nations that Americans don't feel proud of and someone who does not possess the kind of impeccable credentials that America's Ambassador to the United Nations should carrry.

I am sorry that the President thinks it is appropriate and part of his so-called mandate to over-ride the concerns of some in both parties -- yes, both parties -- about John Bolton's "fitness" for this position.

More at the link, including comments:

http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/archives/000867.html


Charles J. Brown: Winners, losers, lessons

August 1, 2005

President Bush's decision to appoint Bolton this morning only denies those fighting the nomination closure - but not much else. We may have lost the Bolton battle, but it sure looks like we won the war. The events of the past five months, taken together, represent a big victory for those promoting global solutions to and cooperative efforts on those problems that no nation can solve alone.

In addition, the Bolton battle is a model for future efforts to engage the American people on international issues. Those who challenged the Bush Administration stayed on message, supplied timely information, praised allies at every opportunity and avoided berating or denigrating opponents.

As a result, the movement for a constructive, pro-engagement foreign policy is both stronger and more effective. A lot of folks on both sides of the aisle found their backbones over the course of the past five months, and thus are more likely to stand firm on similar questions in the future. Our opponents, who expended enormous amounts of political capital just to keep the Bolton nomination alive, emerge much, much weaker.

The Bolton battle also has been an inclusive effort, one that has brought many unlikely players into the fray. I can't say enough about the importance of the Steve's efforts and those of our NGO partners, the field organizers, and other friends and advocates who independently contributed their time, energy, and resources to this effort above and beyond their jobs. We have all made a difference. As this blog has demonstrated over the past week, this was a battle that crossed ideological and partisan divides.

Let me sum up by offering a list of heroes, villains, and lessons. Let's start with the heroes:

<clip>

List and comments at the link:

http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/archives/000866.html


And, on the question of "Why did Bush do this?:

So the question remains: why? Is it as simple as stubbornness? Is it merely Cheney free-riding on Bush's ability to abuse constitutional powers? Does Bush genuinely hold our allies in contempt? The Bush administration blew so much credibility and political capital on this appointment that there must be a serious reason, but no morally neutral rationale comes to mind. I'd love to hear people's thoughts.

My best guess: the underlying intelligence scandals that led us into war are going to blow up in the next year, whether through the Fitzgerald investigation or something else. Bush wants to have a loyalist -- someone he knows will always put loyalty to the Bush administration above the loyalty to the country -- in place at the UN.

<clip>

From The Mystery of Bush's Motive by Dave Meyer on August 1, 2005

More at the link, including comments:

http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/archives/000864.html


And, to close, here is what Steve Cobble has blogged at Huffington Post:

George W. made his continuing contempt for the Senate official this morning, giving John "Mad Dog" Bolton a recess appointment, only days after Bolton confessed he lied to the Senate.

Well, why not? Why should he be the only liar left out? After all, it's not like the "Liar's Club" is some exclusive group in the Bush Administration, like Skull & Bones. Heck, the Bush & Co. Liar's Club isn't even whites-only or male-only. They can all join.

<clip>

Ladies and gentlemen, the Bushies lost this skirmish. Thanks to the coalition that gathered together to oppose this outrageous and insulting appointment, the truth about John Bolton became known around the world. Thanks to the toughness of Senator Dodd and, for once, Senator Biden -- and the conscience of Senator Voinovich -- this is truly a pyrrhic victory for Bush & Co. And particularly thanks to the brilliant, mold-breaking clearinghouse role played by Steve Clemons' blog, www.thewashingtonnote.com, this coalition not only pushed out the truth about Bolton, we broke new ground in grassroots/netroots coalition strategy.

So Bolton got his recess appointment, but we didn't lose. The Liars' Club lost, even though they fixed the game.

From Mad Dog at Recess by Steve Cobble on August 1, 2005

More at the link:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/theblog/archive/steve-cobble/cobblestones-mad-dog-at-_4975.html


Someone should explain gravity to Georgie boy.




Peace.

www.missionnotaccomplished.us - How ever long it takes, the day must come when tens of millions of caring individuals peacefully but persistently defy the dictator, deny the corporatists their cash flow, and halt the evil being done in Iraq and in all the other places the Bu$h neoconster regime is destroying civilization and the environment in the name of "America."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kick for Steven Clemons!
Edited on Mon Aug-01-05 08:00 PM by zidzi
Thanks for all your intense work on tryng to keep the Liar away from being the US Ambassordor to the UN.

It's up to the UN to kick his ass, now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thank you for keeping us so well informed!
I hope we have not heard the last of those documents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Clemons is a very smart man, and is no ideologue.
He not only headed Jeff Bingaman's (D-NM) foreign policy team, he was also first Executive Director of the Nixon Center. He counts among his readers several Senators, Congresspersons, and staffers from both sides of the aisle, and through the course of Bush's entire Bolton debacle, he was in contact with folks in the State Department and other federal agencies. He recently had a Cato Institute specialist as a guest blogger. You would be hard pressed to call his efforts on Bolton part of any Dem campaign to torpedo this disastrous nominee.

Clemons' main concern with Bolton was anything but partisan or ideological: it was Bolton's basic incompetence and unsuitability for the job that seemed to fuel Clemons' investigation, reporting, and commentary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. Thanks for posting! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. excellent!


My best guess: the underlying intelligence scandals that led us into war are going to blow up in the next year, whether through the Fitzgerald investigation or something else.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WyLoochka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. Thank you, Steve Clemons
You did a magnificent job of keeping us informed and shining the light on Bolton.

We wouldn't have known anything if reporting had been left to the NYT and WAPO. And the teevee media would have had Bolton in there months ago and been cheering along with all his mad dog attacks.

Thanks to TWN and Clemons' indefatigable work - WE KNOW THE TRUTH ABOUT BOLTON - and so does the rest of the world. He won't be able to do near the damage that he and Cheney had planned.

Keep shining that spotlight on Bolton, Steve. Thank you.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. One last kick for substance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. Star Tribune: Bolton to U.N./Recess appointment is bad news
Edited on Mon Aug-01-05 09:45 PM by understandinglife
Bolton to U.N./Recess appointment is bad news

Editorial on August 2, 2005


Recess appointments, such as that President Bush used Monday to name John Bolton ambassador to the United Nations, are anything but rare. Bush has made 106; President Bill Clinton made 140 over two terms. That said, Bush's appointment also was anything but wise.

<clip>

Yes, Bolton will be known in New York as Bush's man, but he's clearly not America's man, and Bush is rapidly heading for lameduckhood. This particular recess appointment is not likely to serve the nation's or the world's interests well at all.

Link:

http://www.startribune.com/stories/1519/5537778.html


Not wise - definitely.

Embarrassing, that's the least of it as John Nichols for The Nation aptly concludes by quoting Senator Feingold:

The Bolton Embarrassment

by John Nichols


August 1, 2005

When the United States sought to be a true world leader, as opposed to a petulant global bully, this country's seat at the United Nations was occupied by great men and women. Consider just some of the amazing figures who have served as U.S. ambassadors to the international body: former Massachusetts Senator Henry Cabot Lodge Jr., two-time presidential candidate Adlai Stevenson, former Supreme Court Justice Arthur Goldberg, former Pennsylvania Governor William Scranton, former civil rights leader and Georgia Congressman Andrew Young, academics and public intellectuals Daniel Patrick Moynihan, Jean Kirkpatrick, Madeine Albright and Richard Holbrooke, former State Department aide and New Mexico Congressman Bill Richardson, former Missouri Senator John Danforth.

These ambassdors came from different parties and from different ideological backgrounds, they had different styles and different goals, but they had one thing in common: They served with the broad support of official Washington and the American people. When they spoke, they spoke for America. And they did so in a tradition of U.S. regard for the mission of the UN, which was perhaps best expressed by an American who served for three decades as a key player in the world council, Ralph Bunche. "The United Nations," said Bunche, "is our one great hope for a peaceful and free world."

<clip>

So creepy has been Bolton's partisanship -- he was a prime player in moves to shut down the recount of Florida votes following the disputed 2000 presidential election -- and so crude has been his behavior that thoughtful Republicans such as Ohio Senator George Voinovich determined that the nominee would not be an appropriate representative of the United States. But President Bush has forced Bolton on the U.S. and the UN, making a recess appointment that places his controversial nominee in the same position once occupied by Lodge, Stevenson and Moynihan.

<clip>

U.S. Senator Russ Feingold, a Wisconsin Democrat who as a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee has been a leading advocate for bipartisan approaches to foreign policy, spoke well for America -- and for this country's shattered tradition of respect for the UN -- when he said on the day of the recess appointment: "Mr. Bolton is fundamentally unsuited for the job, and his record reveals a truly disturbing intolerance of dissent. Mr. Bolton did not win the support of a majority of members of the Foreign Relations Committee, and the Senate refused to make a final decision on this nomination pending review of documents that the Administration declined to provide in blatant disregard for the Senate's constitutional rights and responsibilities. But despite all of the warning signs and all of the red flags, the President has taken this extraordinary step to send a polarizing figure with tattered credibility to represent us at the United Nations. At a time when we need to be doing our very best to mend frayed relationships, encourage real burden-sharing, and nurture a rock-solid international coalition to fight terrorism and the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, the American people deserve better than John Bolton."

Link:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/thenation/20050801/cm_thenation/19416&printer=1;_ylt=AnhvQL93MB0EsK4UA3RPJYI__8QF;_ylu=X3oDMTA3MXN1bHE0BHNlYwN0bWE-


Yes, the American people, and humanity, deserve much better.

We will not have anything better until we peacefully and legally remove Bush and his fellow war criminal neoconsters from any role in our government.

What Republicans had better begin to understand is the nature of the hyper-dense mass of crimes and hatred Mr Bush is creating - he is going to destroy them and their party.


Peace.

www.missionnotaccomplished.us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. The world witnesses Bush's dissing of the US Senate
Bush appoints Bolton as new UN ambassador
People's Daily Online, China
- 28 minutes ago
US President George W. Bush sidestepped the Senate and directly appointed John Bolton as the new US ambassador to the United Nations on Monday. ...

Bush bypasses Senate on Bolton appointment
ABC Online, Australia
- 1 hour ago
TONY EASTLEY: His critics say he's an arrogant bully, his defenders insist he achieves results. Now officials at the United Nations ...

Can Bolton shift from lightning rod to diplomat?
USA Today
- 1 hour ago
In March, when President Bush nominated John Bolton to be US ambassador to the United Nations, we saw it as a curious choice, given Bolton's history of anti-UN ...

Bush Bypasses Senate, Names Bolton to UN Post
Los Angeles Times, CA
- 51 minutes ago
By Warren Vieth, Times Staff Writer. WASHINGTON -- Blocked for nearly five months by Democratic lawmakers, President Bush on Monday ...

President Sends Bolton to UN; Bypasses Senate
New York Times, United States
- 1 hour ago
WASHINGTON, Aug. 1 - President Bush bypassed the Senate and installed John R. Bolton as his ambassador to the United Nations on ...

United Nations: Confidence man
Seattle Post Intelligencer
- 2 hours ago
President Bush summed up his recess appointment of John Bolton to the United Nations this way: "I'm sending Ambassador Bolton to New York with my complete ...

Bush bypasses Senate to install Bolton as UN envoy
Guardian Unlimited, UK
- 2 hours ago
President George Bush yesterday sidestepped the Senate and installed John Bolton as US ambassador to the UN, despite protests from Democrats that the ...

Bolton to UN/Recess appointment is bad news
Minneapolis Star Tribune (subscription), MN
- 3 hours ago
Recess appointments, such as that President Bush used Monday to name John Bolton ambassador to the United Nations, are anything but rare. ...

Bush gives Bolton UN job in spite of protests
Telegraph.co.uk, United Kingdom
- 3 hours ago
By Alec Russel in Washington. President George W Bush unilaterally appointed the hawk John Bolton as US ambassador to the United ...

Senate snub as Bolton gets UN job
Irish Times (subscription), Ireland
- 2 hours ago
John Bolton, the man who famously said it would make no difference if the United Nations secretariat lost 10 floors, became US ambassador to the UN yesterday ...

Bush appoints Bolton as new UN ambassador
Xinhua, China
- 3 hours ago
WASHINGTON, Aug. 1 (Xinhuanet) -- US President George W. Bush sidestepped the Senate and directly appointed John Bolton as the new ...

Bush installs hardliner as UN ambassador
New Zealand Herald, New Zealand
- 3 hours ago
By Steve Holland. WASHINGTON - President Bush bypassed the Senate and installed John Bolton as US ambassador to the United Nations ...

Bush sends Bolton to UN by recess appointment
Japan Today, Japan
- 4 hours ago
When George W. Bush announced today that he was using a recess appointment to install John Bolton as the new US ambassador to the United Nations, he said that ...

The Bolton Embarrassment
Yahoo News
- 4 hours ago
United Nations was occupied by great men and women. Consider just some of the amazing figures who have served as US ambassadors ...

George Bush sends ‘damaged goods’ to United Nations
Daily Times, Pakistan
- 4 hours ago
WASHINGTON: As expected, President George Bush went ahead and announced the appointment of John Bolton on Monday as US ambassador to the United Nations, taking ...

Bush bypasses Senate
Hindu, India
- 5 hours ago
WASHINGTON: US President George Bush bypassed the Senate confirmation process on Monday and appointed John R. Bolton as the US Ambassador to the United Nations ...

Bypassing the Senate, Bush acts on UN post
International Herald Tribune, France
- 5 hours ago
WASHINGTON President George W. Bush bypassed the Senate and installed John Bolton as his ambassador to the United Nations on Monday over strong Democratic ...

Bush evades Senate to confirm Bolton post
Calcutta Telegraph, India
- 5 hours ago
Washington, Aug. 1 (Reuters): President George W. Bush bypassed the Senate and appointed John Bolton as US ambassador to the UN ...

Bush Installs Bolton, Angering Democrats
San Francisco Chronicle, United States
- 5 hours ago
By TERENCE HUNT, AP White House Correspondent. President Bush installed embattled nominee John Bolton as ambassador to the United ...

Bush overrides objections and installs Bolton as UN envoy
Times Online, UK
- 5 hours ago
PRESIDENT BUSH bypassed Congress yesterday and installed the hardliner John Bolton as Ambassador to the United Nations, overriding the requirement for the ...

Bush bypasses Senate, appoints Bolton as envoy to UN
Hindustan Times, India
- 5 hours ago
Bypassing the Senate, President George W Bush on Monday installed the controversial John Bolton as the next US Ambassador to the United Nations in the face of ...

Bush sidesteps Senate to appoint Bolton as new US ambassador to UN
CBC News, Canada
- 6 hours ago
WASHINGTON (AP) - US President George W. Bush sidestepped the Senate and installed embattled nominee John Bolton as ambassador to the United Nations on Monday ...

Query link as of 2120 PDT, August 1 2005:

http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&lr=&rls=GGLD,GGLD:2004-34,GGLD:en&tab=wn&ie=UTF-8&ncl=http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-bolton2aug02,0,1427240.story%3Fcoll%3Dla-home-headlines




Peace.

www.missionnotaccomplished.us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Hmmh...definitely sounds like damaged goods to me. It is a disgrace that
our country is sending this man to the UN. I wonder if he'll be greeted with cheers and flower petals thrown at his feet.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
11. "as long as Mr. Bolton is in New York, he will not be wreaking diplomatic
.... anywhere else.

If there's a positive side to President Bush's appointment of John Bolton as ambassador to the United Nations yesterday, it's that as long as Mr. Bolton is in New York, he will not be wreaking diplomatic havoc anywhere else. Talks with North Korea, for instance, have been looking more productive since Mr. Bolton left the State Department, and it's hard not to think that Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice's generally positive performance in office is due, in part, to her canniness in dispatching Mr. Bolton out of Washington.

But the appointment is, of course, terrible news for the United Nations, whose diplomats have heard weeks of Senate testimony about Mr. Bolton's lack of respect for their institution and his deeply undiplomatic, bullying style of doing business. Senator George Voinovich, the Ohio Republican who became one of Mr. Bolton's strongest critics, said yesterday that he planned to send the new ambassador a book on how to be an effective manager. It couldn't hurt, but this may be the first time a world superpower has used its top United Nations post as a spot for the remedial training of a troublesome government employee.

<clip>

The United Nations could certainly be improved, but Mr. Bolton is a poor candidate for a reformer. To make the institution better, the Bush administration would first have to show that it has a vision of what the U.N. could be. That vision has to begin by accepting the fact that nations other than the United States have a right to have a say, and sometimes take the lead.

From Ambassador Bolton a New York Times Editorial on August 2, 2005

Link:

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/02/opinion/02tue1.html


Mr Bolton seems not to be the NYT first choice for US Ambassador to the UN.

Unfotunate that the NYT didn't take a similarly rigorous stand regarding their propagandist-in-chief for the Bush neoconster regime, Ms Judith Miller.

If they had, perhaps a bunch of people would not be dead, disabled, tortured and deceived.

Peace.

www.missionnotaccomplished.us

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. WaPo on Bolton - they fail to distinguish flattery and deception
Edited on Tue Aug-02-05 11:04 AM by understandinglife
"Last week, Democrats pounced on an error in Mr. Bolton's Senate questionnaire, on which he said he had not been interviewed by administrative or criminal investigators in the past five years; he had, in fact, been interviewed at one point by the State Department's inspector general -- a fact the administration says slipped his mind. Like many aspects of Mr. Bolton, it's not flattering, but it doesn't justify denying the president a vote on his choice."


No, WaPo Editors, it could not have merely 'slipped his mind' or the minds of those within the administration who reviewed the document prior to submission of his nonimation to Congress.

"Efforts to find factors that would disqualify him have proved less than overwhelming. He has, to be sure, crossed the line a few times in his behavior toward other officials. But most of the objections come down to his strong policy views and hard-charging style."


No, WaPo Editors, the major issue was the White House denying Congress access to documents that remain entirely relevant to the process of evaluating Bolton's contributions to the administration's deception of the American people and the Congress regarding justification for Bush's war on Iraq.

Link to the drivel:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/02/AR2005080200252.html


Peace.

www.missionnotaccomplished.us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
14. Senator Boxer's call to protest Bolton's appointment
Can't the Bush Administration ever admit they made a mistake?

On Monday, despite widespread opposition from Senators of both parties, as well as the American people, President Bush appointed John Bolton as UN Ambassador. By using the rarely utilized "recess appointment" while Congress is away over the month of August, the White House effectively thumbed its nose at the Senate, bypassing our Constitutional responsibility to "advise and consent" on such a nomination.

It's yet one more example -- as if we haven't seen enough already -- of the absolute arrogance of power displayed by this President and his Administration over and over again.

Enough is enough.

Protest President Bush's foolish decision to recess appoint John Bolton -- email and phone the White House today!

Despite his public pledge to run as a "uniter, not a divider," the President has never heeded his own call.

Over the past few months, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee held hearings to determine whether or not John Bolton was fit to serve as UN Ambassador. In addition to learning from Bolton's subordinates that he bullied analysts in an effort to contort intelligence to his own ends, the White House stonewalled our request for critical documents to shed light on his activities at the State Department.

As a result, the Foreign Relations Committee, controlled by the President's own party, failed to vote Bolton's nomination out with a favorable recommendation. And the Senate refused to confirm him as well, with both Republicans and Democrats working to stop this terrible nomination from going forward.

As if this weren't already enough, just this past week the State Department admitted that John Bolton did not tell the truth on a statement which he swore to the Senate was truthful -- an effort to hide the fact that Bolton himself had been questioned by the Inspector General about the false claim made by President Bush that Iraq tried to buy yellow cake uranium from Niger.

Lying to Congress shouldn't be a reason to promote someone -- it should be grounds for dismissal.

Hold President Bush accountable for his poor judgment in appointing John Bolton -- email and call the White House now!

Sending an individual as controversial as John Bolton to be our representative to the world will only undermine our efforts to win friends and allies at this critical time. Surely President Bush could have done better than John Bolton.

President Bush needs to know that the American people are watching. We will remember his continued effort to put politics ahead of the national interest -- to subvert the will of the American people and the Congress, including members of his own Republican Party.

Make no mistake, we will hold President Bush and his Republican Party accountable at the ballot box next November for their continued arrogance and poor judgment.

Make sure President Bush gets the message, loud and clear. Make your voice heard now!

In Friendship,

Barbara Boxer

Link to a webform:
http://ga4.org/campaign/johnbolton



Peace.

www.missionnotaccomplished.us

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC