Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bob Woodward or Carl Bernstein...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ClusterFreak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 08:05 PM
Original message
Bob Woodward or Carl Bernstein...
....or neither?

Personally I like Bernstein, he still seems like he's got at least a little fire in his belly from the old days. I honestly don't know enough about his career these days to give a properly informed opinion, though I understand he's an editor or something at Vanity Fair? Correct me if need be. I can only say that from what I've seen of him, he still seems willing to stick his neck out, at least a little.

Woodward? I think he likes his Armani suits too much. Whatever inspired him to become an investigative journalist as a young man seems to have dissipated over time. I think if a "Deep Throat" wanted to meet him in an underground parking garage today, he'd probably take a pass. And if Scotty McClellan dropped dead tomorrow, I wouldn't be surprised to see Bob first in line with a resume.

Just my two cents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Have bought my last Woodward book
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Woodward sounds too much like
Forrest Gump. Drives me nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClusterFreak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. ROTFLMAO!!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. He's a ra-por-ter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Read "Heartburn"
by Norah Ephron, Bernstein's ex-wife. Anyone who screws around while his wife is pregnant is a toad in my book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClusterFreak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Ya, I did hear something about that....
....definitely not cool. That makes him a bad husband and a cad. Bill Clinton, whom I admire greatly for any number of reasons, was also a bad husband and a cad. But I hear ya.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. I don't know. Both guys are a little too prominent and too old
to do another clone of Watergate now. I'm sure there are lots of very eager reporters out there today who would die for a chance like that, and they're young enough and obscure enough to get away with it.

The problem is, there're very few Deep Throats ever come along!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. I choose
Greg Palast
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClusterFreak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Absofuckinglutely!!!
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stanwyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
9. Politically, I'd chose
Bernstein. He seems to have drunk less Kool-Aid during his time in Washington. But Woodward? A real whore. He doesn't report. He doesn't investigate. He just spends his time thinking about his next book. He reminds me of Drudge. Not much there. But people can't resist taking a moment to check him out, anyway.
Woodward has been coasting on work he did 30 years ago.
He's a hack. Practically on Gannon's level.
I'm ashamed he's from my home state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Woodward
Somebody on DU that I respect a lot told me that Woodward was part of a group that wanted Nixon out... not just because he was a criminal, but also because they thought Nixon was too liberal! So, that tells you where Woodward stands politically.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Makes the most sense, considering his subsequent behavior. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wurzel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
13. Woodward has traded on Watergate for years. He is a phoney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
14. woodward has sold out, he's a neocon.
he was touting the virtues of Karl Rove the other day, and saying the investigation is a farce
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pretzel4gore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
15. woodward was kgb
or whatever the hell they call the dirty sneakers now...he wasn't even a reporter when he got the washpost job ....and there were lotsa journos who'd kill him for that position! if you could question woodward using a blowtorch assist, he'd tell you all the pathetic secrets of who murdered jfk, the wtergate scam, the iran contra deal, the coups in '63,'74, '79-80 and of course 2k....half the crap the lying punk would tell you, you couldn't believe, because oftentimes the motive was plain old racism (the crack epidemic under reagan) or population control/pharmaceutical windfall profits (the intro of Aids, also under reagan but w/out reagan's knowlege)
one good thing about the geebush experience is that the shabby banality of why the omnipotenti do stuff is now apparent: there was no big idea or long term goal, it was just punks stioned on power fukking around in parking lot breaking windows and scratching the finishes on the nice cars
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Halliburton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
16. Bob Woodward
Just watch this video of him yesterday on Chris Matthews, and it pretty much sums up what he has become. Just disgusting.

http://mediamatters.org/items/200508010003
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC