Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The whole space trip is a blast but it's a ruse for the military industry

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 03:01 PM
Original message
The whole space trip is a blast but it's a ruse for the military industry
Edited on Tue Aug-02-05 03:43 PM by bigtree
Some would argue that the space program is some wonderful pursuit that we should all support. But I would argue that it is an integral part of the military industry executives in this administration's desire to militarize space.


In September 2000, the PNAC drafted a report entitled "Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century." http://manifestor.org/imperium/archive/PNAC.html

The conservative foundation- funded report was authored by Bill Kristol, Bruce Jackson, Gary Schmitt, John Bolton and others. Bolton, ambassasor-appointed, was Senior Vice President of the conservative American Enterprise Institute.

The report called for: ". . . significant, separate allocation of forces and budgetary resources over the next two decades for missile defense," and claimed that despite the "residue of investments first made in the mid- and late 1980s, over the past decade, the pace of innovation within the Pentagon had slowed measurably." Also that, "without the driving challenge of the Soviet military threat, efforts at innovation had lacked urgency."

The PNAC report asserted that "while long-range precision strikes will certainly play an increasingly large role in U.S. military operations, American forces must remain deployed abroad, in large numbers for decades and that U.S. forces will continue to operate many, if not most, of today's weapons systems for a decade or more."

The PNAC document encouraged the military to "develop and deploy global missile defenses to defend the American homeland and American allies, and to provide a secure basis for U.S. power projection around the world."

You can hear the pitch of former Lockheed executive Bruce Jackson, hawking in favor of his company's space weaponry:

-Control the new ‘International commons' of space and cyberspace, and pave the way for the creation of a new military service with the mission of space control. (U.S. Space Forces; eventually realized in the form of the Air Force-financed Lockheed Space Battle Lab) http://www.spacedaily.com/news/milspace-03z.html

-Exploit the "revolution" in military space affairs to insure the long-term superiority of U.S. conventional forces.

-Establish a two-stage transformation process which maximizes the value of current weapons systems through the application of advanced technologies.

The biggest threat to the World community is the proliferation of WMDs here in the U.S., facilitated by a nest of former military-industrial executives (military-industrial warriors) and shareholders in the Defense department and throughout the Bush administration.

With the new money appropriated for homeland defense ($38 billion for FY 2003), virtually all of the big defense contractors — Boeing, Lockheed Martin, and Raytheon have started hawking their products for use in domestic security.

In order to replace weapons used in Afghanistan, and in concert with the military conflict in Iraq, most U.S. weapons makers have increased production. Bombs are big business again and the Bush administration has opened the candy store, exporting death, conquest, and perpetual war.

With a share of 24% of U.S. arms exports, Lockheed-Martin is the world's largest arms exporting company. Lockheed leads the pack of defense contractors who do business with the U.S. with valuable Pentagon contracts worth a total of nearly $30 billion and an advertised $70 billion backlog. http://www.lockheedmartin.com/wms/findPage.do?dsp=fec&ci=12923&sc=400

Lockheed has 125,000 employees in the United States and overseas with 939 facilities in 457 cities and 45 states throughout the U.S.; internationally, with business locations in 56 nations and territories.

Lockheed leads the defense industry in lobbying expenditures. Lockheed Martin made over $10.6 million in campaign contributions to candidates and party committees from 1990 to 2000, including $3.4 million in donations in the run-up to the year 2000 elections. http://worldpolicy.org/projects/arms/updates/051603.html

Products / Services

* AN/APS-145 Advanced Early Warning Airborne Surveillance Radar
* Antennas and Ground Stations
* Astrobiology
* Diversified Programs Operation (DPO)
* Earth Observation Satellite EOS AM-1 (Terra)
* Flight Payloads Integration
* Fundamental Biology
* Ground Research Facilities
* Heat Rejection Radiators
* John Karas Testimony on Future Launch Options For Space Exploration, May 5, 2004
* Life Sciences Research
* Michoud Operations
* Mobile User Objective System
* National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
* Range Standardization and Automation II
* Satellite Communications Services
* Solar Array Flight Experiment (SAFE)
* Space Mission Engineering
* Space Shuttle Thermal Protection
* Space Station Biological Research Project
* Technology Development
* Thermal Protection


The company actively lobbies for the need to retain substantial numbers of existing nuclear weapons while developing new ones. Lockheed Martin receives more than $1 billion per year from the Department of Energy - to operate the Sandia National Laboratories (involved in the design and production of nuclear warheads) and help run the Nevada Test Site for "sub-critical testing" of new nuclear weapons designs. http://actagainstwar.org/downloads/LMflyer2page.pdf

The Arms Trade Resource Center, reported that 80% of Lockheed's business is with the Department of Defense and other federal government agencies. It is also the largest provider of information technology services, systems integration, and training to the U.S. government. Such business has grown substantially during the Bush tenure, especially in fiscal year 2002 as plans for war were formulated. http://worldpolicy.org/projects/arms/links.html

The ATRC report calculates that Lockheed was awarded $17 billion in defense contracts in 2002, up from $14.7 billion in 2001. First quarter sales for 2003 were $7.1 billion, an 18% increase from the corresponding quarter in 2002.

Sales by customer in 2004:

U.S. Department of Defense/Intelligence - 58%
Civil Government/Homeland Security - 22%
International - 17%
Commercial Domestic - 3%



But some would argue me down that their work is just a benign search for knowledge of space.

58% U.S. Department of Defense/Intelligence

22% Civil Government/Homeland Security

Those are the facts. Their mission is primarily military. You can't easily separate the military meddling from the seemingly benign missions that some so strongly support. Until we do the space program will always be part and parcel of a drive by this cabal to militarize space.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. it'll evaporate after peak oil
Like the rest of industry, the economy, and so on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. Computer technology
and microwaves. We can thank the space program for these as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. but we shouldn't allow our support of these benign projects
Edited on Tue Aug-02-05 03:17 PM by bigtree
to cloud our objectivity. The primary contractor for these space projects is a merchant of death. We need to wake up and set our priorities straight. No matter what supporters of space exploration want us to believe, their ambitions are under the control of a military cabal who divert most of our contributions to their ambitions to militarize space.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
5.  just wouldn't want to have a life
without a computer or a microwave. I wonder if and how a lot of this technology would have come about without its use in the space program.

You do make a very valid point, however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kraklen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Well, you can thank the space program if you want to.
As for computer technology, it was invented over quite a long process but first saw lots of development during WWII, and then for private business. The space shuttle uses old Intel 386s for fuck's sake. Modern computer techonology was developed by computer scientists down here on terra firma.

As for microwave ovens, they were patented in 1946.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yup it's great, but not when under control of the military-industrial-
-intelligence complex.

We should realize that they're up to no good.
Once we have things under control again, we can use spaceflight for better purposes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanSocDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. I heard John Glenn say....


...over the weekend, that the 'very worthy' peacetime role of space travel was pharmaceutical research.

That probably sounded pretty good to Americans who have already made that metaphorical leap from good health to good drugs.

I still think that it would be easier AND cheaper to put doctors on salary, than to put soldiers on the moon.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Huh?
I don't get it. They do pharmaceutical research in space?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Why does his legislative body look the other way as the bulk of the money,
trillions, is diverted for military initiatives?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC