Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How long does it take to steal an election?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:50 PM
Original message
How long does it take to steal an election?
Well..so far it has been 1 hour 1 minute.
Stay tuned...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SouthernDem2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. So if he wins it was a fair election but if he loses it was rigged. Nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntPatsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Explain please?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. See this post
Edited on Tue Aug-02-05 09:55 PM by AX10
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Well we all KNOW how honest and fair the election peeps in
Ohio are...:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. And Who, Sir, Does Not Howl 'We Wuz Robbed!' In Extremis?
It is a natural enough tendency. As an old Chicago resident, there are some things about that last county to report that suggest shenannigans to me. But you are certainly entitled to your opinion in the matter....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brettdale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. This was posted in general discussion politics by another poster
About fifteen minutes ago, a rethug official, a Clermont County
party officer, said that the delay in finishing the last 91 precincts
was due to "high humidity causing some problems in handling the ballots..." BULLSHIT ! The ES&S opscan tabulators and the
election workers are in AIR-CONDITIONED ROOMS!!! Are they really so arrogant as to think we're THAT STUPID? Of course...
BTW, Clermont uses opscan, counted by ES&S gear.

And there's word that "some monitors (people) have been shoved out of the rooms." Not sure if this was in Clermont or
another county, but this has ALL the hallmarks of FRAUD!

The rethugs wait until they see how many votes are needed to
assure a victory, and keep the margin just above what's needed
to trigger a recount. Betcha it'll be just over 1/2%, which is what
I think is needed to auto a recount...the infamous "3% random
precinct selection."

I'm tellin' ya, Americans, there's gotta be blood in the streets to
take back the country from the Corpo-Fascists. Shee-it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meppie-meppie not Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. here are some new Clement numbers....
Current Election Results: 8/2/05 Election Find on this page:
Printable View
http://www.clermontelections.org/default.php?section=results&topic=current

Special General 2005
8/2/05
08/02/05, 10:49:17 PM
191 of 191 Precincts Reporting



Representative to Congress 2nd District (Vote for: 1)
Early Voting Election Day Provisional Total Percentage
JEAN SCHMIDT 1158 16162 0 17320 58.09%
PAUL HACKETT 750 11689 0 12439 41.72%
Write In Votes 3 56 0 59 0.20%
Total Votes Cast 1911 27907 0 29818 100.00%




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC