Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ruling threatens stings in child-sex cases

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
kweerwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 08:45 AM
Original message
Ruling threatens stings in child-sex cases
Things looked bad for Jan Helder of Mission Hills when a federal jury convicted the lawyer Tuesday of using the Internet to try to entice a child into sex.

He faced a sentence of five to 30 years — but for only a few minutes.

Quick relief came from a federal judge in Kansas City. He acquitted Helder, 42, in a landmark ruling that could, if it stands, threaten federal prosecution programs nationwide that use undercover agents to trap child-sex offenders.

Helder’s attorney successfully argued that breaking federal law required actually enticing a minor — not enticing a Platte County deputy pretending to be a minor.

http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/news/local/12288360.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Gyre Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. Don't worry. There are hundreds of pols in Washington
who will be falling over each other to amend the law to cover this. So they can tell their constituents just how wonderful they are.:(

Gyre
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. As much as I despise and loathe pedophiles,
I think that this is a good thing in the long run. Entirely too many law enforcement agencies go over the line into entrapment and enticement in these kind of cases. It is nice to see somebody wanting some boundaries drawn and limits set on this sort of matter. Hopefully it will get appealed up to the Supreme Court for a definitive ruling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XboxWarrior Donating Member (369 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. the baby jebus......
hates registration sites
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Go to www.BugMeNot.com for login and password. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kweerwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
4. I have really mixed feelings on this.
Edited on Wed Aug-03-05 09:38 AM by kweerwolf
On the one hand I think pedophiles should be strung up by their genitals. But on the other hand, I think some of these sting operations take things a bit too far.

One of the local TV channels did a piece on a private group that does sting operations on line and then posts the "conversations" and photos of the alleged perpetrators on a web site. Some of those conversations really strike me as being borderline entrapment. What was sad is that the TV station aired the piece accusing these men of soliciting underage girls on line without the men ever having been convicted - or even charged - as pedophiles.

There's a happy medium that needs to be reached. Young people need to be protected online, but there also has to be limits placed on over-zealous sting operations.

On edit ... here's a link to one of the local stories about the TV station and the "sting" operation:

http://www.pitch.com/issues/2004-03-11/news/strip.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC