Anybody notice the number of flamebait threads started by sub-500

[MercutioATC]

Poll question: Anybody notice the number of flamebait threads started by sub-500

posters today? Most, in fact, in the sub-200 range. Since I'd never invoke the wrath of the mods, (well, not as sober as I am right now anyway) a poll:

Today's overwhelming nastiness in GD (and DU in general) is due to:

[MercutioATC]

1. My point: Let's keep things in perspective...

Bad day. Lots of idiots. Let's play nice.

[bigluckyfeet]

2. That is not Always True

I have about 125 posts,and only made my second post today,I joined last november.I am here reading most of the day.

[MercutioATC]

5. I'm absolutely NOT accusing all low-post-count members.

I'm just making the observation that Rush brought attention to us recently and there seem to be a bunch of brand new posters posting flamebait.

If I offended, I'm sincerely sorry. I think new blood is extremely important here.

[Padraig18]

7. I read for 2 m,onths before I even posted.

When I finally did post, this flame war BULLSHIT just began exploding! :(

[liberalnurse]

3. I totally agree.....

it is caused by the infection of "freeperitis".

Treatment......

1.avoidance of freeper communities

2. attend/visit a democratic rally (Dr. Dean can be a refrral)

3. stay home and read 1000+posts at DU in non-bashing threads

4. If al else fails; a freeperectomy.....



O8)

[SWPAdem]

4. you forgot

unhappy childhoods, lack of a sex life, and the heartbreak of psoriasis

[MercutioATC]

6. Damn! Wish I'd thought of that..the wonkiest thing I could think of

was a "Hair" reference....

[Dookus]

8. Almost as bad

as all the flame-bait attack threads is the fact that for every one of those threads, somebody else creates a NEW thread commenting or complaining about them, and hence, not a single fucking thing of any REAL importance stays on the front page of GD more than 5 minutes.

[Elvis_Christ]

9. So, do you want this to be a closed community?

Do you think that the ability to begin threads and initiate discussion should be removed from anyone whose post count is below a certain magic number? Do you think the fact that more people are discovering these forums, likely as a result of being recently inspired to become more politically aware and active by a candidate such as Dean or Clark, is a bad thing?

Just a few things to think about...after all, everyone here had a low post count at one time or another. These members with low posting numbers are newly energised by politics, and (like many here with much greater longevity on these boards) feel the need to convert all us poor benighted individuals who haven't seen the light as they have. I'd cut them some slack.

[MercutioATC]

10. You obviously didn't read post #5.

I really do think that new blood is important here (heck, I'm kinda new blood myself). I was just making an observation about the number of ugly threads today and by whom the majority of them had been started.

Again, like I said in post#1: Bad day. Lots of idiots. Let's play nice.

[Kamika]

11. youre not allowed to insinuate posters are trolling

Or accuse someone of being freeperinsh , just so you know

[MercutioATC]

13. In my own cute way, I was trying to accomodate that rule...

...not nearly cute enough, apparently

:eyes:

[Padraig18]

12. I am absolutely APALLED...

... by the number of flames posted by fellow Dean supporters! Trust me, the VAST majority of us would rather see substantive threads! :)

[kaitykaity]

14. Locking.

Please feel free to post your valid questions and
concers in the Ask the Administrators forum.

Thanks.

kaitykaity
DU Moderator