Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sibel Edmonds: Reveals content of the FBI intercepts Re: 9-11

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 08:58 AM
Original message
Sibel Edmonds: Reveals content of the FBI intercepts Re: 9-11
In an exclusive interview Sibel Edmonds was asked if she would deny that laundered drug money linked to the 911 attacks found its way into recent House, Senate and Presidential campaign war-chests, according to what she heard in intelligence intercepts she was asked to translate.

"once this issue gets to be investigated, you will be seeing certain people that we know from this country standing trial; and they will be prosecuted criminally," revealing the content of the FBI intercepts she heard indicates that recognizable, very high-profile American citizens are linked to the 911 attacks.

When asked how many Americans were named in the intercepts, Edmonds said "There is direct evidence involving no more than ten American names that I recognized," further revealing that "some are heads of government agencies or politicians--but I don’t want to go any further than that,"
http://www.fathers.ca/fbi_cover-up.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NV Whino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. Stay out of small planes, Sibel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthboundmisfit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Hell, stay out of big ones, too!
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
41. Most importantly, please stay off of MY planes...!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. and the DOJ's immediate response was to STONEWALL...
...in the name of national security. Right, national security....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
23. BSUH - TEAR DOWN THAT STONE WALL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. Best. Response. Ever.
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jarnocan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #23
32. might make a cool sign
http://pogoblog.typepad.com/pogo/files/vanityfair_clean.pdf here is the article, but should still buy mag in support if you can and share it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
53. They dubbed it; "In keeping state secrets" off limits to public
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
4. Tom Flocco reported this though
Edited on Thu Aug-04-05 09:28 AM by KoKo01
and some DU'ers say he "makes things up." Someone posted that the "New Yorker" is going to have an interview with her in their new issue though. ON EDIT: It's "Vanity Fair" not "New Yorker." I plan to look for it this weekend.
Edited Again:
Lots of info in DU WB Forum which doesn't depend on Flocco, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. I don't know about The New Yorker,
but Vanity Fair does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yes....just saw the post and edited..
went over to the "WB Forum" and found out all the info there..plus article. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yodermon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. He keeps quesitonable company.
From his wikipedia entry, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Flocco :

Tom Flocco is an independent investigative journalist who has written for Scoop.co.nz, AmericanFreePress.net, WorldNetDaily.com, FromTheWilderness.com, NewsMax.com, NarcoNews.com, and JudicialWatch.org

Smells like a disinfo agent to me.

Although why he reported outright that Fitzgerald had indicted Bush & Cheney, an utterly self-debunking story, is very interesting in and of itself. If he's "poisoning the well" with disinformation, why use something so blatantly ridiculous?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. That's what I thought.
why would he say something like that and destroy any credibility he had
unless the motive was so overwhelming.

It is interesting that Edmonds points out Chicago is where much of the "bribery" was going on. Fitz/Chicago. And, he's gone after Daley's machine there. Flocco does an article on Edmonds linked here, calling attention to her. But, then puts out his bizarre article. Maybe he's just fantasizing that there's a tie or he's doing disinfo.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #4
20. Sibel Edmunds affair is no less relevant then Plame outing!
I wish 10% of what's been reading would hit the press.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. KOKO - check out current vanity Fair issue 11 page interview with Sibel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. Thanks....I went over and checked out the PDF
incredible!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
25. He wasn't the only one
Edited on Thu Aug-04-05 12:32 PM by Mabus
http://baltimorechronicle.com/050704SibelEdmonds.shtml

....JH: Let me read you a short quote from Dr. Griffin's book, quoting from War and Globalization: The Truth Behind September 11 by Michel Chossudovsky and ask you to comment on it. "...The transfer of money to Atta <$325,000>, in conjunction with the presence of the ISI chief in Washington during the week, the missing link behind 9/11....The evidence confirms that al-Qaeda is supported by Pakistan's ISI (and it is amply documented that) the ISI owes its existence to the CIA."

SE: I cannot comment on that. But I can tell that once, and if, and when this issue gets to be, under real terms, investigated, you will be seeing certain people that we know from this country standing trial; and they will be prosecuted criminally.


on edit: The rest of this post has been reformatted and posted in the WB forum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #25
42. What's The Date On That Interview ???
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. published on May 07, 2004.
according to the website.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mogster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
5. Post this in the WB group too?
Could you post this in the whistleblower group?

Here:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topics&forum=344

Thanks! :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
61. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistressedAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
6. Great News! Kick and Nomination. Keep This Story Hot People!
We are just getting out of the starting gates on this one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #6
19. Try googling Sibel Edmunds Vanity Fair - just hit news-stands
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheepyMcSheepster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
7. kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellerpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
10. Kick! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
11. Let's see...the article references the State Department
and intercepts...who do we know who was in the State Department about whom intercepts was a question---oh yeah, Bolton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
13. bush gave millions to taliban prior to war
what was it, 48 million. people ask why? have we ever gotten an answer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whatever4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
14. And these criminals need Patriot Act access to our lives?
That's what gets me about the national security talk.

WHO gets access to all our personal info, and WHAT do they do with it? Safeguard us? Or profits and cya?

I don't see how anyone falls for this. Criminals are in charge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
15. Edmunds:Stated that FBI confirmed 9-11 info was received in 4/01
June 21, 2005
Where Is Accountability?
by Sibel Edmonds

No action was taken by FBI and after 9/11 the agents and the translators were told to keep quiet regarding this issue.
http://www.antiwar.com/edmonds /

Also- http://www.fathers.ca/fbi_cover-up.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #15
40. I want to know "where is the accountability", too!!!
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
16. hmmmm
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
17. Edmonds - Rovegate - DSM - Fitzgerald!!
Flash! > Three weeks before President Bush selected Kean on December 16, 2002 to head the terrorist probe.(15 months after September 11, 2001)

Amerada-Hess--an oil company where Kean is still a director and shareholder severed its joint venture deal with Saudi Arabia’s Delta Oil, involving one of the largest undeveloped oil fields in the world in the Caspian Sea basin. (Fortune, 1-22-2003)

http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/april2004/010404chairmankean.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
21. I read an article that says she is under a gag order
that prevents her from testifying in court or naming the people involved.

Apart from conspiracy and cover-up - does anyone know what possible reason/excuse is given for this gag order?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Al-CIAda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
24. Sibel Edmonds and Karl Schwarz-
Audio interviews-
Sibel Edmonds is discussed and is an integral part of the Karl Schwarz story as well...

NATIONAL INTEL REPORT
Thu., January 13, 2005: Playlists: M3U | RAM (Individual MP3s: Hr1 Hr2 )
Guests: 1st Hour - Karl Schwarz (www.KarlSchwarz.com)
http://mp3.rbnlive.com/Stadt05.html

HOUR 1
http://mp3.rbnlive.com/Stadt/0501/20050113_Thu_Stadtmiller1.mp3

HOUR 2
http://mp3.rbnlive.com/Stadt/0501/20050113_Thu_Stadtmiller2.mp3

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #24
35. .
:7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevietheman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
26. Wikipedia article on Ms. Edmonds
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trekbiker Donating Member (724 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #26
34. kick!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
28. We should be talking about this more
In July, 2002, Ms. Edmonds filed suit against the FBI, alleging wrongful termination in retaliation for reporting criminal activities committed by government officials and employees. Eventually, in 2004, Edmonds was granted a trial, in which she anticipated her wrongful termination complaint would be heard. On May 6, 2005, in the hours before the hearing of her case, three Republican judges issued a ruling that barred all reporters and the public from the courtroom. During the proceedings, Sibel was not allowed into the courtroom for the hearing. Afterwards, when her case was dismissed, no reason was provided, and no opinion cited.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #28
52. Edmunds-Rovegate-The DSM and whatever Fitzgerald brings to the table
If this is all put together someone has to be behind bars, we know Cheney will be the first to resign citing health reasons, but Bush? he needs to be impeached.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
30. Amy Goodman had something on this story this morning
http://www.democracynow.org/

I just caught a bit of it, but it was about Hastert allegedly receiving bribes from Turkish parties, according to messages Edmonds was receiving as a translator. They said that Edmonds has filed a suit for wrongful termination but that the Bush Administration is trying to intervene and keep her lawsuit from going forward, alledging that information threatening our national security would come out. National security seems to be a regular fallback argument for the Bush Administration in court of late, including the Abu Ghraib pics/tapes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jarnocan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
31. Hastert took Turkins bribes? Vanity Fair areticle
<http://rawstory.com/news/2005/Vanity_Fair_floats_allegations_GOP_chief_Hastert_took_Turkish__0803.html> Her web site is great. Her new letter is very interesting <http://www.justacitizen.org/> Some of what she says in her letter reminds me of John O'Neill -the one that died at the WTC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murielkane Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
33. Please go kick Larisa Alexandrovna's blog entry on this
Larisa Alexandrovna (lala_rawraw) has a blog entry on the latest Sibel Edmonds stuff at The Huffington Post: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/theblog/archive/larisa-alexandrovna/of-boiled-frogs-namely_5119.html

With enough comments, it will show up on the front page there, giving this story some much-needed visibility. Please go read it and leave a comment. This is something that can actively make a difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. really....only fifteen responses at Huffington
they 'read' the posts first, so are any/many being kept off for whatever reason?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. Bush's Faustian Deal With The Taliban
Bush's Faustian Deal With The Taliban Prior To 9-11

Considering that just months prior to the 9-11 terrorist attacks our President,

George W. Bush, gave the Taliban $43 million of our taxpayer's money to help ...

home1.gte.net/deleyd/wtc/bushfaust.html

Memebers of the Taliban were actually at his pig farm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Al-CIAda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #33
44. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
38. Another swift
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Al-CIAda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
39. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #39
45. ''
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sintax Donating Member (891 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. in the poppies now n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tgnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
47. Looks like she'll be needing the federal witness protection
progr-- oh...wait a minute.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
48. 77% Of Americans Think Admin. Is Hiding Something Or Lying In Plame
Investigation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
49. The Inmates Truly Are Running The Asylum !!!
When will this damn dam break???

Thank you Sibel... be careful please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
50. Isn't this constant smearing BS. getting a wee-bit old as a tactic?
Sibel Edmunds? Ashcroft gags her to silence!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
51. High profile americans linked to the 9/11 attacks.
High profile americans linked to the 9/11 attacks...

High profile americans linked to the 9/11 attacks....


Plame is important. DSM is important. In both cases, though, everyone really suspects they know what happened, even though the specifics are not known. The administration twisted intelligence and protected itself by lies and deceipt and smearing. We know that. We also know our troops did things they shouldn't at Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo.

But if details of 9/11 come out that surprise 99% of the population (American involvement? Allied involvement?), this is something that moves the tectonic plates of politics and global power, reshaping our opinion of ourselves and our system of government.

Nothing has the potential of pulling the rug out from under our dysfunctional democracy quite like "high profile americans linked to the 9/11 attacks." this is so huge and shocking that it's frightening to think what might happen if true and exposed.

I have a feeling this information is going to come out in one of two ways, either 1) the Supreme Court hears the case and lifts the gag (SCOTUS the center of attention again), or 2) SCOTUS doesn't hear case or decides against Sibel, in which case Sibel and journalists find a way to get the information out there anyway.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Al-CIAda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
54. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raiden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
55. Damn! Sibel better get all the facts out
Edited on Fri Aug-05-05 07:30 AM by Raiden
She ain't gonna live much longer. Pretty soon she'll be found dead of 'natural causes'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meppie-meppie not Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #55
58. I was just about to post this very same thought!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raiden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-05 04:52 AM
Response to Reply #58
62. I really am surprised she's made it this long
I'm pretty sure she has the knowledge to bring the whole Bush cabal down
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meppie-meppie not Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-05 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #62
64. I think so too! Hope she has 24/7 body guards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
56. big money, big drugs, big crime, big politics all connected
and they make big things happen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Al-CIAda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
57. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
59. This Edmunds story should be kicked around to gain more traction!
During my work there I came across some very significant issues that I started reporting in December of 2001 to the mid-level management within the FBI.

They said to basically leave it alone, because if they were to get into those issues it would end up being a can of worms. And after I didn't see any response from this mid-level bureaucratic management I took it to higher levels all the way up to Dale Watson and Director Mueller.

And, again, I was asked not to take this any further and just let it be. And if I didn't do that they would retaliate against me.
http://baltimorechronicle.com/050704SibelEdmonds.shtml

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #59
60. kick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #60
65. kick, it's pissing me off Vanity Fair's article is falling towards archive
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Al-CIAda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-05 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
63. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC