Freepers on SCOTUS nominee gay rights work

[medeak]

(I had to peek)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1456868/posts

[Atman]

1. Do you have to force the rest of us to click on that cesspool?

It gums up my mouse when I surf there. Got any good excerpts?

[medeak]

2. don't make me return..

just took a shower and washed mah hair....

[Ian David]

3. Oooh. It looks like fun and games over there

The sad thing is, despite their closed-minded bigotry, wrong-headedness and mean-heartedness, there is actually some intelligent debate going on over there.

What a waste that they're so hateful and ignorant.

[napi21]

4. There's divided opinions there. Some totally trust the WH vetting

process, and some are very skeptical.

Here's a snip from one post that I thought pretty funny.

"And Souter was "good enough" for Bush senior; Kennedy was "good enough" for Reagan.
I'm inclined to agree with Coulter that "good enough" doesn't cut it, not when we control the Senate and have a VP tie-vote breaker.

We ought to be going for "demonstrably and clearly proven" not merely "good enough, even if that means a one-vote squeaker win. The last thing we need is an apparent conservative who is ready to jettison his conservatism to advance emotion-based judical legislating on behalf his favorite oppressed ersatz victim group."

[Canuckistanian]

5. Wow, that's a mouthful

"ready to jettison his conservatism to advance emotion-based judical legislating on behalf his favorite oppressed ersatz victim group."

Watch out! They've learned how to use a thesaurus!