Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rush Limbaugh on Homosexuality

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 08:10 AM
Original message
Rush Limbaugh on Homosexuality
This is from yesterdays show - as I thought, he didn't print the transcript, but surprisingly he did make an audio file of the conversation available. So I transcribed out the relevent section - although I did a pretty poor job, probably.

Rush: Nobody's against homosexuality. Well I guess some people are against it, but what Roberts did in this case, he took it pro-bono and helped the Supreme Court overturn a duly passed initiative in Colorado, an initiative which many people think was discriminatory towards Gays in the Workplace and in other circumstances. And if anything you could say "Hey, the guy believes in civil rights."

The LA Times is trying to draw this wedge between Roberts and the Conservative Movement in this country on the basis that he's pro gay, and I, Most Conservatives that I know don't care about . What people do in private is not a concern. It's when there is an attempt to impose it or sanction it as normal, this is where some people begin to have a problem with it. When they feel it is being force on them and they have to accept it, when they have deeply held beliefs against it, and the courts start siding against tradition and all that then people start getting concerned.

Ergo, here comes Roberts, he's going to be on the court, and he's a conservative nominee and therefore original intent of the constitution is supposed to be something that he adheres too, and then the LA Times comes out with this story. All I said was that this story is going to drive a wedge between some people on the conservative side.

Lisa - It probably will, and for me, I don't expect him to answer the question, but for me I think it would just be interesting if it came out that he was morally against homosexuality. It would prove that he is able to rule on cases according to law and not on personal opinion.

Rush - the thing about being morally opposed to homosexuality, I think that's an incorrect standard to apply to anybody, because I don't know too many people who think it's a choice. In some cases, where women have admitted it later on where they've chosen it after a life time of what have you, but it's rare. You can't say something that isn't a choice, uh attach moral and immoral to it.


If you want to listen to it - http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/today.guest.html It's next to a bullet named If Homosexuality is Not a Choice, Then Morality Isn't At Issue

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well, Rush....no one is "forcing" homosexuality on others.
Excuse me...where is this movement to "force" homosexuality on America? Please, help me understand that.

Gay people, such as myself, merely want to live our lives, openly, without being discriminated against. Is that what Rush baby is referring to? That we pesky homosexuals are being pushy and expecting equality...that we work, and pay taxes, and live by the rules and obey the law...just like Rush and his followers? Although, I might be stretching it a bit to think that Rush obeys the law. My bad.

I have a big, big problem with that part of his screed. But by God...I actually agreed with this one: "Rush - the thing about being morally opposed to homosexuality, I think that's an incorrect standard to apply to anybody, because I don't know too many people who think it's a choice. In some cases, where women have admitted it later on where they've chosen it after a life time of what have you, but it's rare. You can't say something that isn't a choice, uh attach moral and immoral to it". God help me, I agree with that. He's actually got that one right...no, it is NOT a choice. One can't attach questions of immoralty to something that isn't a choice. It's like saying someone left handed is immoral.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. That's the thing
To me it's worth it to listen to the origional to listen to him try to contort his body around all the positions he wants to take.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genieroze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
16. It's like saying someone left handed is immoral.
They used to do that at one time. My dad was a southpaw and the teachers used to whack him if he used his left hand. More fundie values. They used to think the left hand was evil and therefor the work of the devil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ovidsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Blame it on the Romans
In Latin, sinister literally means on the left handed side. It also is used (in Latin) to refer to something considered evil or immoral.

"Thanks, Alex! I'll take etymology for 50, please..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonkronz2003 Donating Member (47 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. Two faced lying scum....
"It's when there is an attempt to impose it or sanction it as normal, this is where some people begin to have a problem with it."

So where's his argument against pushing creationism..........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thebigidea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. suddenly the little prick is a libertarian! Nice try, junkie.
Edited on Fri Aug-05-05 08:22 AM by thebigidea
as if he wouldn't rant to hell and back about a "trial lawyer" Democrat working for gay rights groups. Prick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
5. What the HELL?
His brain must weigh 400 grams by now. Geaux maggots!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
6. yes but, choice or not
it's my damn body and my life.

I don't care if choosing to have green contact lenses or being born with green eyes is "flaunting it" for some people who hate the color green.

I'm not "imposing" by living my own life. They are prying by thinking they have an opinion about how I should live my life.

The premise is that they are somehow in a position to make a judgement about me, but imagine the outcry and outrage if I started a movement to not recognize heterosexual marriages or make it illegal to have sex in the missionary position, or allow heterosexuals to adopt or visit each other in the hospital or to fire someone for being straight.

Claiming moral authority about my eye color, by choice or by birth is completely irrelevant, and the same thing goes for who I want to wake up next to in the morning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheepyMcSheepster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
7. he mentioned he wasn't sure if erosion was responsible for grand canyon
on yesterday's show he mentioned that he wasn't sure the grand canyon was formed due to erosion.

clearly he is a morong or pandering to the "god made everything 5000 years ago" crowd.

he is a weak man. no balls or brains.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Todd B Donating Member (809 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
8. Like.. oh, I dunno...
What people do in private is not a concern. It's when there is an attempt to impose it or sanction it as normal, this is where some people begin to have a problem with it. When they feel it is being force on them and they have to accept it, when they have deeply held beliefs against it, and the courts start siding against tradition and all that then people start getting concerned.

Like.. oh, I don't know, prayer in school, or believing in creationism, or other religious beliefs?

Oops, sorry - had a brief moment of sanity. I'm off to go get reindoctrinated by the Department of Homeland Security. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. One question I've had about Rush over the last little bit
Is how much is he being influenced by his fans and by the growth of fundamentalist power. I get the impression Rush would be most satisfied as a libertarian republican - certainly in favor of big corporations stomping on all the rest of us, but ok with smoking drinking and screwing around. But as his audience has skewed pious, he's forced to follow them, leading to the sort of mental gymnastics on display today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
9. *scratches head*
I give up, lol.

When Rush Limbaugh is beginning to repeat core messages of the gay rights movement, you know four horsemen will be galloping through the town square any second now.

I'm putting all my money into canned food and shotguns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. LOL
"you know four horsemen will be galloping through the town square any second now."

classic pretty good one from Prism the newbie LOL really good
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
12. gee why can't rush keep a wife? why do all his wimmen LEAVE him?
could he be in the closet? could he be unable to relate to real people on an emotional level? etc.

Msongs
www.msongs.com/political-shirts.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
13. Is this a 180 by Rush ?
Why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kweerwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #13
23. Are you saying Rush is flip-flopping on homosexuals?
Eeeeewwwwwww! That image is sooooooo wrong on so many levels!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalmonChantedEvening Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
14. So, according to the OxyMoran
Nobody's against homosexuality, as long as it's looked upon as abnormal and that homosexuals remain societal pariahs.
huhwhatwhofuckno?

I'm sorry, I was stoned from 1974 to 1990 and I never had a thought THIS fucked up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tsiyu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. Think about it
He could be one of those guys who likes illicit sex. If it's naughty and dirty, it must be good. If you have to do it in secret, all the better.

If all people are allowed to love whom they wish, openly and without any discrimination from others, the whole "secret, bad" rush is GONE. PLus the concept of "acceptable in private, derided and demonized in public" fits with their sociopathic, criminal, manipulative manner as human beings.

Lying and hiding things and not walking the talk are hallmarks of the very best Repukes...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalmonChantedEvening Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. We'll know for sure once the Daryn Kagan tell-all book comes out.
That being said, I agree completely. The taboo is the (pun unavoidable) rush they seek, and to legitimize the vice would kill their need for it, and in an odd way, what they see as their right to it.

A repeat of the Victorian idea that only the upper classes were able to view and appreciate pornography, and that the masses were unfit, unprepared and most importantly, undeserving to view such things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tsiyu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. Really wacko folks, no doubt
It's almost like a form of schizophrenia, but instead of the whole world conspiring against you, they are bowing down and granting you your every whim because you are SOOOO special: The Divine Right of Kings and all that rot.

And we thought the Constitution put that ol' King George and every other king in his place...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalmonChantedEvening Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. Terry Pratchett makes several mentions of the term 'privilege'
In his Discworld series, and how it's Latin root is 'private law.'

One set of laws for the commoners, and a set of private laws for those who believe themselves to be their betters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politick Donating Member (885 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. Lol
1974-1990: Those were very good years...

Have you heard that joke about the monestary where everyone had taken a vow of silence? Ends with "Some monk chanted 'evening'"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalmonChantedEvening Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #21
26. Based on what other folks tell me, they sure were!!
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
15. Rush is worried that his bust in the 70s for soliciting will come out
In Pittsburgh, under the name Jeff Christy. Paid a fine, got fired, left town. Unfortunately, that was before computers. Someone would have to spend days digging through old citations to find it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mithnanthy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #15
24. He's Jeff Christy...
.....and he marries "beards". What a fraud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
17. I am shocked!
Intelligent discourse on Rush's show? That's simply amazing.

Saw a thread on this yesterday and assumed that Rushboy just misread his script or something on the "choice or not" issue, but reading the transcript, it sounds like he actually believes this to be true. And I have to say, it sounds like some kind of wisdom acquired late in life, perhaps because he is facing up to something in himself.

I have no love or respect for this man whatsoever, but then again, people can and do change. If the biggest right-wing douchebag on the planet has a moral conversion at this late date, I *could* respect him for that. We'll see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flying Dream Blues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
27. Hmm...do you think he is afraid
someone will out him? So he's softening his stance so as not to look like such a hypocrite? This sure doesn't sound like Rush...keep us posted, I can't stomach listening to him myself. I'm afraid my head will explode, literally, I get so mad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. I can only take him in small doses -
just happened to catch this as I was driving back to work.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhunt70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
29. The absolutely most funny thing about Rush Limbaugh on the defensive is...
after years of him leading the talk radio market, branding a new style of talk radio and political "discourse", and basically molding the way many people even think about politics (personally and professionally), he now gets defensive about divisive tactics used against his base.

The whole world has caught up with you Rush and they are armed the same as you are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC