Judith Miller
LeftyElvis
(136 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-05-05 09:17 AM
Original message |
|
Anyone know why she is still is jail. I mean, we know who her leaker was; KKKarl Rove. What's the deal? Were there more leaks in the bush sinking ship?
|
Captain Hilts
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-05-05 09:22 AM
Response to Original message |
1. No, we're not sure Rove was the leaker. |
|
He permitted Cooper to tell his name. Miller's source is different, or, perhaps, she is the source.
|
pk_du
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-05-05 09:26 AM
Original message |
I agree Millers source could be different OR |
|
- The communication from Rove to her is more damning that that between Rove/Cooper
BUT - "she" cannot be "the source"..... she was never entitled to have the info, som whoever told her was her source ( possibly Libby if not Rove)
|
warrens
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-05-05 09:26 AM
Response to Original message |
2. We know there was more than one |
|
And there is an interesting quirk to treason and other laws; there have to be TWO witnesses.
Fitzgerald appears to be looking at a conspiracy, and as such needs all the witnesses he can get.
And besides, she deserves it for her Chalabi and DoD stenography pre-war. And after war too. That one where she reported a farmer was pointing to the ground and how that confirmed that there were WMD in Iraq was a real howler.
|
thebigidea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-05-05 09:27 AM
Response to Original message |
3. because she's protecting criminals |
|
its just a coincidence that she's a warmongering, lying piece of shit that should rot in jail for decades.
kinda like getting Capone for tax fraud, really.
|
newyawker99
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-05-05 09:35 AM
Response to Original message |
gratuitous
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-05-05 09:39 AM
Response to Original message |
5. She's still in jail because she's still contemptible |
|
I mean, she's still in contempt of court for not complying with the judge's order that she name her source.
|
bridgit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-05-05 09:43 AM
Response to Original message |
6. welcomne to du, LeftyElvis... |
|
:hi: but then it's all = poor Judith, who knew 'journalists' were so principled :shrug:
|
TreasonousBastard
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-05-05 10:01 AM
Response to Original message |
|
eventually. I hope, anyway. Right now it's all guesswork.
This investigation is the tightest one in memory-- absolutely no leaks or hints at what's going on from the investigators. A lot different from Starr and his PR department.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:50 AM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.