|
It untaxes those with enough money to purchase a house at the expense of those who don't have that much money.
It's especially regressive b/c it allows TWO house & interest payments on up to $1 MILLION on debt.
It'd be much less regressive if it were limited to ONE house, and payments on up to $500,000.
However, there are a number of other tax loopholes that, coupled with artificially low interest rates, inflate the real estate market. Inflated home values displace more secure savings, leaving all income spent.
All these people with their own little slice of the pie virtually guarantee that no one will upset this particular apple cart. Unfortunately, most people's slice is actually very very small.
When the bubble comes, and it will, they'll be out on their ears, and the uber-rich will buy up their real estate at fire sale prices. Nine years later, when markets have recovered, and real estate heats up again, the uber-rich will then sell real estate back to the middle class.
The correct alternative imo, is to deflate the real estate speculation bubble with careful reductions in 'loopholes' while reducing future speculation by taxing land values (and concurrently reducing taxes on building values). (Real estate values are composed of unimproved land values + improved (building) values) Note that 70% of homeowners pay less under such a plan (because they have well-kept homes on modest lots - highest value land is generally commercial, and commercial tenants already pay for that value to their landlords, who keeps the money. Such a tax inherently comes from the landlord, not the tenant)
|