Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John Roberts labeled as “moderate.” How accurate is that? -->

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-05 02:52 PM
Original message
John Roberts labeled as “moderate.” How accurate is that? -->
Ha!, moderate! Right. And Howard Dean is a commie and Judith Miller a martyr. Roberts is certainly not a moderate, he’s a right-wing activist with an agenda. He despises the rule of law, and has noted that he’d like to see the executive branch of government enjoy more power.

So much for checks and balances. Repeatedly over his career he has gone after minorities. He’s had an iron-fist approach to justice. He recommended against expanding the 1965 Voting Rights Act, because, as he wrote, the extension would “not simply extend the existing and effective Voting Rights Act, but would dramatically change it ... It’s not broken so there’s no need to fix it,” he claimed.

After his stint as Solicitor General’s he took a gig with the National Mining Association and hence his ruling against environmentalists when they challenged development practices that were impeding on an endangered species. The list goes on. Moderate Justice? My ass. Too bad the Democrats are going to rubber stamp this creep.
http://www.pressaction.com/news/weblog/full_article/mic... /


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-05 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Compared to whom???????
Edited on Sat Aug-06-05 02:54 PM by BrklynLiberal
What is that saying.."A man with one eye is considered wise in a society of all blind men."

Let's keep things in context.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-05 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Accurate. Roberts is a moderate right-wing crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-05 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. Just keep in mind that Bushco was reassuring his nutty base
for a year that Roberts would deliver the goods.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firefox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-05 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. It is like this
Edited on Sat Aug-06-05 03:02 PM by firefox
If the fascists that run the government nominated a non fascist in their efforts to control the courts, that would be news nobody could keep quiet. He is the fascists' fascist.

Calling Roberts moderate is disinformation. They will not even release real information on his history of legal writings. Hold the truth and spread the lies.

I call bullshit on the article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-05 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. He only moderatly sat in Jeb's office in Nov of 2000 to
make sure there was no recount.

All spin and disinformation.

I have ?s about his "support" for
gay rights in the past ..... might he not be supporting himself?
Not that their is something wrong with being gay but to
be gay and a bush repug is like being a jew for Hitler.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-05 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. Without access to his full record, who can say?
And, just like in the Bolton nomination, the White House refuses to release Roberts' full record, handicapping the Senate's ability to do its constitutionally mandated job of advise and consent. The Executive is seeking to set itself up as primary over the Legislative branch, which is unconstitutional.

Why is George W. Bush violating the oath he took to preserve, protect and defend the constitution?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mairead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-05 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
7. He's as "moderate" as most of the "moderates" at DU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mr mister Donating Member (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-05 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. Who cares?
Bush nominated him, so he should not be confirmed. Period. The key is damaging Bush, making him vulnerable so his stolen reign can be ended. Roberts should be opposed no matter what.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BillZBubb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-05 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Can't agree.
The issue is whether Roberts is fit for a lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court. Since Bush named him, we have every reason to be skeptical. But we need to attack Roberts based on Roberts' record and philosophy as warranted. If Roberts' record is bad enough, calling attention to that will hurt Bush.

One way or another Bush got a second term. We can't change that. I do agree that the Democrats should use every tactic available to slow down Roberts' confirmation in retaliation for the Bolton appointment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mr mister Donating Member (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-05 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. We need to delay it until 2008
Bush cannot be allowed to name a justice. The only way to stop that is to find the skeletons in their closets and get them removed from consideration.

It sounds impossible, even ridiculous, I know, but look at the alternatives.

Quite honestly, the fact that he's "conservative" ought to be enough to disqualify him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-05 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Hi mr mister!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattSWin Donating Member (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-05 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
9. Does anybody really think George W. Bush..
Would nominate a moderate as a Supreme Court Justice?

You can almost bet two things: Bush knows exactly how Roberts will rule in key cases and that he will rule as a diehard conservative Republican especially on social issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-05 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
13. he's another goose-stepping Federalist Society Klansman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC