For those who still believe in Sherman Sholnick

[Domitan]

Read this article by him and tell me that you still think he has credibility!

http://www.rense.com/general44/middle.htm

The pictures and accompanying spy agency notes (not to be attributed to anyone in particular), are quite explicit. They show a trio of apparent homosexuals getting off.

Ostensibly unhandcuffed, the newsies began poking their mental fingers, if not their actual pens, into once-forbidden portals and orifices.

"Hey, do you see what we have here?" comes a rhetorical throwaway question, from a voice with no name. Plainly, it was a trio of untouchables, top-level male sex-mates, sucking and screwing each other. Prince Charles, Britiish Prime Minister Tony Blair, and White House occupant and resident George W. Bush.
(To divert attention from the real situation, the British and others in the European press are running stories that Prince Charles had a minor functionary as a homosexual sex-mate, rather than the ones mentioned in this story.)

For the love of God, Sherman may make for fun bathroom reading, but people who cite him as a serious source for consideration only serves to discredit themselves and their cause! While it's all good to be skeptical of your own government and news, be also prudent in how you choose your sources to use in your quest for truth against the den of liars.

[Walt Starr]

1. My Rense policy:

If it's on Rense, there is no way in hell it's true.

[laststeamtrain]

2. Favorite Skolnik moment: When he was talking on Rense about...

..."ultra secret CIA technique known as SM."

[billbuckhead]

3. He's more believable since the Gannon story broke

:hide:This article is from 11-8-03 and nothing that has happened since makes it less believable.