WTF? Saddam deceived about his own WMD...

[Flubadubya]

Just heard about this "new theory" on CNN that even Saddam was lied to by his own scientists and advisers that he had great stockpiles of WMD when, in fact, he did not.

Now doesn't that just take the prize?! Didn't say who came up with this theory yet, but isn't it certainly convenient? Well, if even Saddam didn't know he didn't have WMD, how could anyone possibly fault the Bushies for not knowing, right?

Oh, the Ministry of Truth is in full swing on this one. GAG me with ten tons of anthrax!! :puke:

[Spentastic]

1. ha ha haHA HA - sob sob sob

Fucking hell. What's next. WMD were desert mirages?

I suppose all that satellite imagery supplied by Powell were just scientists building mock WMD factories to fool their glorious leader?

You can't have it all ways I'm afraid.

There are no WMD. There is no evidence of WMD.

Sp what were the U.S saving the world from?

[emad]

2. WMD = weapons of masturbation

Bush = Shrub = Stump

[FlaGranny]

3. Didn't the administration

say something that amounted to - Hussein was at fault because his denials of WPM led the administration to believe he was lying, so therefore he had to have the weapons?

Such round-about reasoning!

[bowens43]

4. Unbelievable.

What are these idiots in DC going to come up with next to try to justify their illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq.?

I heard a clip from a weekend interview with Powell where he basically said that to think saddam didn't possess WMD because there is little or faulty evidence indicating that he did , is a logical fallacy.

So the lack of evidence of WMD is not an indication hat there were no WMD.

We don't need proof, we don't need convincing evidence. At least they haven't yet said that the lack of evidence is proof that he possessed WMD.

[caledesi]

6. Unbelievable is right. There's more to this crazy logic -

So the lack of evidence of WMD is not an indication hat there were no WMD

now, get this, freepers use the analogy that "we can't find Saddam Hussein, but we knew he was there." :wtf:

These must be the "talking points" bec when I troll freeperville, I see these same crazy lines.

Wasn't it ol' * himself, who chided reporters about "proving a negative?" Wish I had a link bec I know he said this before he was elected.

[Aidoneus]

5. deeper and deeper, with an endless supply of shovels..

I'd be amused by all of this if I thought that the propagandists & their superiors would ever see punishment for any of it.