Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fitzgerald news on AAR

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 07:52 PM
Original message
Fitzgerald news on AAR
The rumor of S&B guy replacing his boss isn't too big of a deal. According to someone who's speaking on "Majority Report" the public pressure and news paper editorals really have an impact and keep them on their toes. They're not as independent on public opinion. Fitzgerald is on a modle of his own and he's very independent. Tune in now if you want to hear more. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. I Wonder if This Was Done Intentionally
by his boss.

Could it have been a move to diffuse any potential bad PR of Fitz and his boss being close and personal?

Or could this be a Fly Trap for Administration?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbeach Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. only a messenger
FA
been following this CS guy..seems logical but me not attorney..
so far bushco has more moves than a drunken dance ensemble..

CS: Fitzie cannot be fired...
according to CS an attorney..who is all over the bush indictments

"have no fear under dog is here.."

keeping my fingers crossed and my rosary beads shined..


http://www.citizenspook.blogspot.com /


"Monday, August 08, 2005
TREASONGATE: The US Attorney General's Office AND President Bush Have NO LEGAL AUTHORITY To Remove Patrick Fitzgerald As Special Counsel
The Attorney General, Acting Attorney General or any other officer of the Department of Justice has NO LEGAL AUTHORITY to remove Special Counsel Fitzgerald from the Treasongate investigation or prosecution-- AND -- President Bush does NOT have the legal authority to fire Patrick Fitzgerald in his capacity as "Special Counsel".

Analysis of federal law (involved with both the appointment of -- and authority granted to -- Special Counsel Fitzgerald), Comey's press conference of December 30th, 2003, and Decision B-302582 (September 30, 2004) issued by the Government Accounting Office, leads to the following legal conclusions:

1. James Comey, in his capacity as Acting Attorney General, with respect to the Justice Department's investigation into "the alleged unauthorized disclosure of a CIA employee's identity" (hereinafter "Treasongate"), delegated his plenary authority to Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 508, 509, 510, and 515, conferring upon him "all of the authority of the Attorney General" thereby transferring his status as Acting Attorney General, in this matter, to Fitzgerald."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I hope they can't get rid of him
Do you think they would've gotten rid of him sooner if they could?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Right.
Getting rid of Fitzgerald wouldn't change things now. It's way too late for that.

Things are good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbeach Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. or y did'nt they get rid of Fitzie sooner?
I am trying to decipher the CS stuff which is a study unto itself but macullum cannot fire him .. so can't bushfraud..

CS says the law of the special counsel or whatever his exact title is states Fitzie has to stay and even bush is not above the law.
.My spin is poppy o gets the S&B mccollum in there to do damage control and impede it as much as legally and of course otherwise possible..


DUNNO??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC