Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Okay. if you disagree with the Pres, you're a threat to National Security?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 09:55 PM
Original message
Okay. if you disagree with the Pres, you're a threat to National Security?
And Americans are buying this shit?

This blows big time.

Hey, Bush! I say you suck donkey dicks! Come arrest me, too!

This fucker has no couth or dignity about him. He's been giving america a "fuck you" since he's been in office.

I'd rather spend the rest of my days in Gitmo than be subservient to the shit this used rubber likes to spew.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Tell us what you REALLY think, TYJ
Enough of this pussyfooting around... Spit it Out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. LOL.... I'm sorry, but this asshole has broken every last straw I can come
up with.

His "Bring it on" attitude is going to eventually piss off the rest of the American populace to the point where they do "bring it on."

I hope.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. "Send lawyers, guns and money"... the shit has hit the fan!
Stole this from one of my favorite tunes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. "Sugar, Sugar" -- right?
--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Warren Zevon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Of course Warren Zevon
Do you remember the song "Sugar, Sugar" at all? By The Archies?

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. hhhmmm seems like I might...what's more of the lyrics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #12
26. You asked for it ...
In all its glory.

--p!


Sugar, Sugar
(Ron Dante)

Sugar, ah honey honey
you are my candy girl
and you've got me wanting you.
Ah honey, ah sugar sugar
you are my candy girl
and you've got me wanting you.

I just can't believe
the loveliness of loving you
(I just can't believe it's true)
I just can't believe
the one to love this feeling to.
(I just can't believe it's true)

Ah sugar, ah honey honey
you are my candy girl
and you've got me wanting you.
Ah honey, ah sugar sugar
you are my candy girl
and you've got me wanting you.

When I kissed you, girl,
I knew how sweet a kiss could be
(I know how sweet a kiss can be)
Like the summer sunshine pour your sweetness over me
(Pour your sweetness over me)
Sugar, pour a little sugar on it honey,
Pour a little sugar on it baby

I'm gonna make your life so sweet,
yeah yeah yeah
Pour a little sugar on it
Pour a little sugar on it honey,
Pour a little sugar on it

Sugar, ah honey honey
you are my candy girl
and you've got me wanting you.
Ah honey, ah sugar sugar
you are my candy girl
and you've got me wanting you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. LOL. It all comes rushing back. Yes this is the song that I though I
remembered. Thanks for the memory rush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Dad, get me out of this! Still say that should be Bush's theme song.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. You haven't forgotten, have you?
"You're either with us or against us in the fight against terror."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SouthernDem2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. That was a rumor I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Now that YOU have pointed that out, I will certainly withdraw my
objections.

This administration is as certainly as upfront and legitimate as the Nixon administration in its views of differing opinions. When will we have another Kent State?

Sorry, I consider a slight from you as a badge that I'm on the right track.

Have a nice day.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SouthernDem2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Hmmm
I reread my post numerous times and fail to see a "slight."

Lets see I stated, "That was rumor I think." Nope, still do not see it. Let me try again.... Nope, nothing.

Oh well, once again I can not make sense of your post. Guess it is just beyond me.

Read this: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x4291613
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. From Ms. Sheehan, an arrest has been threatened Thursday
if they stayed.

It is apparently beyond you.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SouthernDem2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. But she stated on the radio that neither the Police or bush's people
told her that. It was some local offical.

I have to admit I enjoy reading your posts more then most. They are always interesting. It is always a challenge to figure out what you are trying to say and what post you are actually replying to.

Still never stated how my first post was a slight. I was never able to figure that one out myself. Little help?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. my my aren't we just blessed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. Medieval English ideas of treason. The king is the country
opposition to the king is therefore treason.

That changed when Charles II was beheaded for treason. The idea that the country was something larger than its leaders was new, and apparently still too complex for W to grasp. Then again, if it's more complex than a longneck, a pretzel, a babe, or a coke pipe, Bush won't bother trying to grasp it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gemini Cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. It was Charles the first that was beheaded.
After which time they received several years of dreary puritanical Cromwellian rule. Sort of like what we have now.
CharlesI was an ass, but Cromwell was much worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Well, yeah, it was Charles I, but if you use the metric system
Okay, sorry, yes it was Charles I. Whether Cromwell was better or worse is often debated, but the point was that the state was seen as above the king. The king was no longer the law.

Cromwell tried to rule a country whose government from the bottom up had been built on monarcy, and he had no real structure to replace it with. Kind of like us in Iraq. Governments, even monarchies, are organic, and can't be replaced by simply replacing the head. That's why democracies that evolve work better than democracies which are imposed--which rarely if ever work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
24. That's why it's called "the loyal opposition"
Without the "loyal" it's merely the opposition, which was illegal (punishable by death, of course).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
13. Well, not until Thursday
You're not a threat to national security until then. At least, that's how I read this latest insanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
15. Sure, if you're paranoid...
... and see yourself as the embodiment of the state. The history books are full of such men, and history does not view them kindly.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
18. Yup! If you're FOR democracy and AGAINST tyranny,...you're caged,...
,...in the BushCo/neoCON trap of manipulation and exploitation. They TRAP both advocates for humanity and abusers of humanity in their ambition to exploit everyone. Hence, they nurture human cruelty and destroy human hope and possibility,...without ANY respect for life.

Get it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
19. You're wrong. You become a national security risk if you become
a nuisance when Bush is planning a big old bbq for his friends. If you're not a security risk on Wednesday, but are on the day of his party then it all makes perfect sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libertypirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
20. I think it has to do more with if you present the man the truth...
If she does so he cannot deny it any longer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lannes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
21. Thats why they keep the protestors miles away in pens
From where he is speaking.I love it when he spreads freedom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kickin_Donkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
27. Maybe we'll find out Wednesday ...
when Cindy Sheehan is supposed to take a flight up to Chicago. If she's on the no-fly list, we'll know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elidor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
28. Haven't you heard? America is a National Security(tm) Zone now
Edited on Tue Aug-09-05 12:50 AM by Hardhead
The First Amendment Zone is in Gitmo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC