Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Watching the Economy Crumble

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
whosinpower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 04:34 PM
Original message
Watching the Economy Crumble
http://www.counterpunch.org/roberts08092005.html

REALLY good read - timely since Bush is touting how great the economy is.

By PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS

snip - Of the new jobs, 26,000 (about 13%) are tax-supported government jobs. That leaves 181,000 private sector jobs. Of these private sector jobs, 177,000, or 98%, are in the domestic service sector.

Here is the breakdown of the major categories:

• 30,000 food servers and bar tenders;
• 28,000 health care and social assistance:
• 12,000 real estate;
• 6,000 credit intermediation;
• 8,000 transit and ground passenger transportation;
• 50,000 retail trade; and
• 8,000 wholesale trade.
(There were 7,000 construction jobs, most of which were filled by Mexicans immigrants.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's summer and tourist time. Jobs for kids during the summer. These
jobs disappear in September. The real estate jobs will disappear with the crash - if it ever comes. And the credit intermediation is because of the new bankruptcy bill. Why are construction jobs filled by Mexicans? I thought those were high paying jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. I think
the construction companies want to break the unions and the hire illegals instead for a fraction of what a union worker would make. In the skilled trades I don't think this is happening but in the unskilled construction trades I think it is happening a lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Yes, it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 07:12 AM
Response to Reply #12
33. It's pure economics in the right-to-work states
I'm seeing a lot of minority presence in the rough trades--framing, roofing and siding especially--in my area. And of this presence, many times it's two or three black guys running a crew of Mexicans. Why not? You can hire Mexicans to work in the broiling sun for $12 per hour; white guys don't come that cheap, but to Mexicans that's good money. Hell of a lot better money than you can make in Mexico, anyway.

It's easy to tell these kinds of companies without even seeing the workers: look at their trucks. You'll see two things--sometimes together, sometimes separately. One is a statement of cheapness: "call for lowest bid," "we beat any estimate," something like that. The other is a shrine to Jesus painted on the side of the truck. I've seen rows of Jesus fish painted along the sides of the truck. I've seen Jesus fish used as part of the company logo. I've seen "Miracle Builders" and "Everlasting Grace Construction." I've seen the entire side of the vehicle covered in Scripture.

What I've never seen is anything about the great quality of the work these companies do. There's a reason for that: no one around here gives a shit and they haven't for quite some time. Back around Christmastime I told you about my favorite contractor--the woman with the Ph.D. in construction engineering who brings us homemade cookies on her once-weekly shopping trips. Well, yesterday she was in. (No cookies, unfortunately; this was an unscheduled trip.) She was looking for some damn thing for a house she bought to renovate and sell. "Yeah, it's a really well-built house. It lasted 35 years and now it's falling down." I must have had this really weird look on my face when she said that; she asked what was wrong.

"You didn't say what you just said, did you?"
'About what?'
"About a house that's falling down after being up 35 years being well-built."

She got what I was saying immediately. Houses should not fall down after standing only 35 years!

I have made my decision. If we win the lottery, we're going to move to Seattle, start a company called "The Most Expensive Contractor in Seattle," hire a bunch of high-quality American-born craftsmen to work there, and build homes that will outlast the 50-year warranty on the siding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loge23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. crumble from the weight on top
The Chimp economy is a top heavy one with the most significant economic gains going to the top 2%. Of course Chimply is amused - he gets to pay back all of his benefactors with tax breaks and "energy incentives". The rest sweep up after them.
Turns out he didn't need them anyway - Uncle Dick figured out a neat way to rig the elections!
Trickle down! The rich eat hamburgers too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Al-CIAda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Welcome to DU, Loge23. nt
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Hi Loge23!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is the usual sour and barren reality behind all the claims
and promises. Even without the facts in front of you, you just know from intuition that employment is all headed to dead end slave wage jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. What will be left to drive the U.S. economy will be the ultra rich....
Edited on Tue Aug-09-05 04:51 PM by whistle
....representing 5% of the population, the bureaucrats, professionals, police protection and military who support the ultra rich and protect their wealth which is about 20% and the skilled and semi-skilled service workers who attend to and serve the needs of the ultra rich which could be about 50% of the population, while the remaining 25% will be the untrained, huddled, forgotten masses, much like the model of Charles Dickens Victorian England who will scrap by on whatever they can beg for, scrounge from the trash heaps or steal from one another and occasionally from the wealthier classes. It is not at all hard to visualize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. Paul Craig Roberts Continues to Amaze Me
Edited on Tue Aug-09-05 04:54 PM by ribofunk
having read him back in the days when he was a dyed-in-the-wool Reaganite supply-sider. His editorials in Business Week always annoyed the hell out of me:



Short Bio
Defense of Reagonomics in National Review, 1992


To see his scathingly anti-Bush articles today (for example, The Brownshirting of America) gives me enormous hope that more traditional conservatives (if you can call him that) will increasingly swing against the Bush administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. Every one of those "jobs" is a statistical myth. They DON'T exist.
Edited on Tue Aug-09-05 05:09 PM by TahitiNut
The figures cited are "seasonally adjusted." In fact, the number of people employed in the private sector in July was reported as 112,930,000, which is 88,000 fewer people employed than the reported 113,018,000 in June!

When total employment (including government) is considered, there were 1.2 million fewer people employed in July (133,531,000) than in June (134,732,000)!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. 50 plus year old engineers are virtually unemployable
Quite a few of us around. I couldn't even get hired at a newly opening grocery store. I'm getting a bit concerned...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Guess what's the #1 reason for job refusal I've been given?
"Over-qualified"!! :puke: (Lying, bigoted scum!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
21. That should be as illegal as saying "you're black, a woman...."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. I agree. I've been told to "play dumb" too many times to count.
I've tried explaining that "overqualified" is code for "old" but some people are dedicated asshats. I've "dumbed it down" almost to the point of letting the drool come out of the side of my mouth and soak my tie -- and still get called "overqualified" by some (Harvard-style) MBA still in short pants with deep-seated parent issues and a vacuously neat desk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. I remember being told that
this one time (by the way, many times for me too) by some snot who thought he was Mr. Supercool as he was snapping his suspenders. He kept running his hands up and down those suspenders to make sure I noticed he had them on. I should have brained him right there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Yes, I know
as the tech companies around here have been laying off like crazy the last few years. But 50 year olds in general are virtually unemployable. I often think those resumes go straight ot the garbage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
etherealtruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. That's delusional ...
make it 40+ year olds in science and engineering and I'll agree...

:grr: :grr: :grr: :grr: :grr: :grr: :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. Oh I will agree with that as I know a tech guy(MS in software eng)
who got nailed after being at the same place for about 15 yrs and it took him almost a yr. to find something. His job was outsourced to India along with his whole group as soon as they completed their latest project. He got VERY lucky as he is getting paid the same amount as his previous job. I have read 400,000 tech jobs have gone in the last few years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. I've been doing sales. First was mobile homes sales. Just got
fired last week. Now selling advertising in a monthly paper. Things get any worse I may start punching repubs that tell me how great things are going.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
12345 Donating Member (267 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #7
35. just curious...where do you get your figures, and what's up
with the figures that you hear all the time (200,000 new jobs this month)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #35
39. I get "my figures" from the BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics) ...
Edited on Wed Aug-10-05 10:50 AM by TahitiNut
... which is the same source as the "Seasonally Adjusted" figures. It's no secret that the figures touted in the press are statisically-derived. It's also no secret that the figures for employment are derived from a monthly household survey conducted by the Bureau of the Census. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
11. any comparisons of this to the Great Depression?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Not even close. Should we ever have another depression we would
be in very bad shape. In the Great Depression, 80% of the people worked on farms. They knew how to feed themselves. They could handle hard work. Had the large familes so they all could work. Most of use in this country don't product anything now. Or even know how to produce anything. From making clothing to growing food. What happens when the plastic shoes give out? What happens when you can't pay for cable? It will not be pretty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. I'm looking for numbers, actually
Unemployment, poverty, and so on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Unemployment reached 25% in 1933 and there was a lot of
underemployment back then too but just as today, the government really doesn't track that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. it's not a hopeful situation; getting real numbers now is impossible
Finding real numbers for 72 years ago is going to be a lot harder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. Since Bush has been in office I don't trust the unemployment
and many other numbers. Probably if you double whatever they say unemployment is, you'd be correct. So many people I know who made a lot of money ten yrs. ago are now unemployed and they have been unemployed a long time. Some are living off their money or took really crappy jobs. The very lucky ones got good pensions that they took early.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. they've been fake for a long time, but now they're utter fantasy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. Yes, plus they keep revising downward the actual employment
numbers and revise up the unemployment numbers. Revisions are done mostly for the Friday night/ Saturday papers when no one sees them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
12345 Donating Member (267 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #11
36. June 18 The Economist had a disturbing article about the housing bubble.
"Not only does this dwarfany previous house-price boom, it is larger than the global stockmarket bubble in the late 1990's (an increase over five years of 80% of GDP) or America's stockmarket bubble in the late 1920's (55% of GDP). In other words, it looks like the biggest bubble in history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
15. I can't see where the dubby gang digs up their information
In reality, things are looking rough. 6,000 more in credit mediation-there's your sign.
HIS deficit is going to be halved sooner. Why in the hell is their a deficit to begin with? And I won't blame it all on dubby missing his memo on vacation which caused 911.
5 years of these lies afte the initial lie that he inherited a recession. Clinton had this place rolling and dubby has stifled almost anything positive in America.

I'm no economics expert, but the ones who pass for experts in his administration make me feel like one.
:rant:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OxiLimbaugh Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
23. Once the Bush real estate bubble bursts
Once the Bush real estate bubble bursts, after the raising interest rates and ARMS kick in, we are looking at another great depression. Keep your cash in the bank.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. Welcome to DU Oxilimbaugh
I think so too.
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
entanglement Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
27. Is there any data on the average pay ($$ per hr) for these jobs?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cornjob Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
31. So few jobs that create additional wealth!
I am stunned at how few of the new jobs in the Bush Economy create added value. For example, building a tractor creates an item that continues to add value. The same can be said of music, film, chemicals, etc.

The Bush economy is based on service jobs, many of which are simply transactional - credit cadets, selling houses, renting movies, etc.

Even Bush's manufacturing economy - defense manufacturing, is a dead-end pursuit. Tanks and bombers create jobs, but do not add value.

What a messed-up state of affairs!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spike from MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
34. But the economy is growing faster than any other
major industrialised country and job growth is strong. Bush said so yesterday. Why do you hate 'Murika?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #34
37. Hey! I've Got A Bridge In New York To Sell You
Wanna buy it? That's how gullible we'd have to be to accept what he said yesterday.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spike from MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. Hey, sounds like a good deal to me.
Will you take a check? ;)

Yeah, it's amazing that people still believe ANYTHING the Chimp says. All most people have to do is take a look at their own financial situation to figure out that the economy isn't doing so hot. Less income + greater expenses != thriving economy.

A friend of mine owns a high-end audio shop and when I stopped by last week to drop off my turntable for repairs, the conversation turned to Dubya as it always does -- he hates Dubya as much as I do. He said he keeps hearing about how well the economy is doing but funny thing, he's just not seeing it in his business. Gee, isn't that odd? They wouldn't be lying to us about the economy now, would they? Keep in mind that even though his shop is high-end, most of his customers aren't rich. Most of them are just average Joes with average incomes. People are holding on to what little money they have and not spending like they used to and his shop is feeling the affects. Yeah, the whole media spin on the economy is a complete crock but apparently lots of people are oblivious to that fact. Ignorance is bliss I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC