Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

helping out placebo: should Native American mascots be banned?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 05:07 PM
Original message
Poll question: helping out placebo: should Native American mascots be banned?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Compromise: Encourage increasing Native American Studies programs...
Edited on Wed Aug-10-05 05:12 PM by Dr Fate
...at schools that use Native American imagery/mascots.

Could this be the way to make lemonade out of this?

That's the best I can come up with at this point. Heard it on the Big Eddy Show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. no.
There is no way to make lemonade here. Our students should know more about indigenous cultures anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. This could be a way to goad schools into increasing those programs...
Perhaps they could be convinced to increase those programs before they change all their marketing & traditions?

...and the more folks learn, the more likely the students/future alumni are to be sensitive to other cultures.

You know as well as I do- nothing inflames hard-headed white people more than telling them they cant do or have somthing involving "heritage" or "tradition."

Hell, I openly opposed the Confederate Flag in GA, so I guess I'm flip-flopping here to a degree...I guess the difference with that is there was more of a split on opinion- but that split did not happen over night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NaturalHigh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. My high school team was the Warriors.
I've known of one person who was offended. Exactly how PC do we have to go?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. mind if I ask what you ethnic background is?
I'm beyond white, in the interest of full disclosure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NaturalHigh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Not at all.
White as can be. My great-grandfather was half-Cherokee and half-Irish, but you could never tell it by looking at my pasty skin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. then "warriors" has no particular attachment
to your background or anyone else's. Rest easy.

Of course, I'm only assuming your h.s. team mascot wasn't some cariacature of a Native American.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. I live on Long Island
Do you know how many of our towns are named after Indian Tribes? ChaNge the name of the TOWN? What are they going to call the teams from say, Massapequa HS? The Massapequa GLADIATORS? Dumb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. They should be replaced with White American stereotypes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. but, as we know,
that's not the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NaturalHigh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. I liked the "Fighting Whities" at UNC
At least I think it was UNC - an intramural team if I remember correctly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. there was a thread about that a while back.
Much as I love the idea of the "Fighting Whities", it still isn't the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Placebo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. i didn't realize i needed help!
well...that kind of help anyway :-p
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. your poll did.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mark11727 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
11. Idea --- replace ALL mascots with ANIMALS...
Lions

Hawks

Pandas

Squids

etc...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. makes sense to me. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. I agree
The problem with using native American tribes as mascots is not that the names are insensitive, it's that you're placing them in the same context as other things that are being used as mascots (Most notably, animals.) Their culture is too valuable and important to be lessened in such a manner.

I can see how a member of the Seminole tribe might get a bit cranky about having their cultural heritage placed on the same level as a Husky, Lion, Bear or Frog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
15. Even the liberal St. Pete Times is against NCAA on this
http://www.sptimes.com/2005/08/10/Opinion/NCAA_vs_Seminoles.shtml

NCAA vs. Seminoles

Social tolerance is a worthy objective, but the NCAA should have taken more care before issuing its ruling on American Indian mascots.

A Times Editorial
Published August 10, 2005

Universities are no place for symbols of social intolerance, but the NCAA won't advance that important educational cause with an assault on mascot names that is seen as more political correctness. That's why the decision to treat the Seminoles of Florida State University the same as the Savages of Southeastern Oklahoma State University, for example, is jarring and misguided. Not all mascots share the same history or meaning.

At FSU, the university has built a relationship with the Seminole Tribe of Florida that includes scholarships, consultation on Seminole symbols used at sporting events, and plans for an authentic chickee to be built in Tallahassee. The tribe itself has formally supported the university, an endorsement that should have meant something to the NCAA.

Here is how Tribe Council member Max Osceola Jr. reacted to the decision to include FSU on a list of 18 schools that are banned from using their mascot names in any NCAA post-season event: "Here's another example of non-Indians telling Indians what's good for them. No one from the NCAA came to our tribe to ask us directly.

..more at link...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ismnotwasm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
18. I voted yes
Because of the spirit of ignorance from which most of these mascots started. There still is some college out there (Illinois?) that has some white kid dressed up in feathers and war paint before games. It the mascot can be done with a spirit of respect, then it's a little different picture. We had this debate here with a local middle school, and several Native American kids came out and said that they were NOT offended, and didn't wish the mascot to be changed. It was a dignified looking "chief" with full head eagle feather regalia.(it was changed anyway)The red-faced big nosed "injun" needs to go away, and I believe it mostly has. But some of the things we connect with American natives are sacred to many of the bands--really. It would be kind of like having Jesus doing the boogie-woogie swinging a cross over his head. So I don't know that it's so much a matter of being politically correct (a term I absolutely despise) as respectful of culture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
19. Yes, but...
how far does this go? Should Notre Dame stop being the Fighting Irish because it's a derogatory depiction of Irish men? It certainly perpetuates an unflattering stereotype of Irish people. Contrast that with a team called the Braves, a stereotype of Native Americans, to be sure, but one that also acknowledges bravery, which is surely a desirable trait.

In the end, I know that it comes down to who has the right to name peoples, or use a name assigned them by others. The Irish who approve of "The Fighting Irish" have taken that derogatory term and claimed it as their own badge of honor among themselves, perhaps in the same way some African Americans have reclaimed the "N" word and use it among themselves.

What I'm saying, I guess, is that I fully support Native Americans seeking to ban N.A. mascots. But if it's good for them, I's like to see all racial stereotypes removed from sports mascots, and I just don't see that happening.

I know this is a confusing post. I guess I'm just acknowledging that there are cultural subtleties and inconsistencies in US society that are, well, confusing. Don't hit me! :hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Names of tribes - fine. But Redskins? Come on...
I haven't heard those of Irish descent complain of the 'fighting Irish' tag and let's face it, we didn't place any Irish on reservations. We also didn't enslave them and we don't hold up huge sums of money from them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
20. NCAA White Honkies? Yeah, sure, whites would love that.
Names and streotypical icons encourage disrespect and they are not fun for everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nemo137 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 02:29 AM
Response to Original message
23. As an incoming Illini,
I have mixed feelings. On the one hand, it's a proud name, and apparently comes from a speech about the whole man given my a long-ago Illinois coach, who cited the supposed Illini concept of manhood (fwiw, Illini translates out literally as "man"). I'm an Illinoisan, and proud to be going to U of I, and for me U of I has always been the Fighting Illini. On the other hand, if the First Nations people left in Illinois feel offended by us jacking their name for our team, then we should change. I'd recommend the Fightin' Flatlanders, with our proud mascot, Fred the Soybean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 02:36 AM
Response to Original message
24. Here's a simple question for those who don't see the problem here..
Would you tolerate a sports team called the "Oakland Niggers" or the "New York Kikes"??

Apologies for using the offensive racist words. But the word "Redskin" is no better than either of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC