Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cindy 'Changed Story on *?'; Tracking A Lie Through the Conservative Media

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
truthpusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 08:46 AM
Original message
Cindy 'Changed Story on *?'; Tracking A Lie Through the Conservative Media
Media Matters just released this to the press...

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/usnw/20050811/pl_usnw/media_matters_for_america__cindy_sheehan__changed_her_story_on_bush____tracking_a_lie_through_the_conservative_media109_xml

Media Matters for America: Cindy Sheehan 'Changed Her Story on Bush?'; Tracking A Lie Through the Conservative Media
-------------------
23 minutes ago
-------------------
WASHINGTON, Aug. 11 /U.S. Newswire/ -- Cindy Sheehan, mother of a soldier killed in Iraq, has drawn significant media attention for staging an anti-war protest outside President Bush's ranch in Crawford, Texas, where she is demanding to meet with the president. On Aug. 8, Internet gossip Matt Drudge posted an item on his website, the Drudge Report, in which he falsely claimed that Sheehan "dramatically changed her account" of a meeting she had with Bush in June 2004; Drudge attempted to back up his false assertion by reproducing Sheehan quotes from a 2004 newspaper article without providing their context. After the story appeared on the Drudge Report, it gained momentum among conservative Weblogs and eventually reached Fox News, where it was presented as hard news and in commentaries. Media Matters for America will examine how one false story on an Internet gossip site ended up the focus of prime-time cable news coverage.

Drudge's Aug. 8 item claiming that Sheehan had changed her story used quotes from a June 24, 2004, article in The Reporter of Vacaville, California, where Sheehan lives. The Reporter article described a meeting that Sheehan and 16 other families of soldiers killed in Iraq had with Bush in Fort Lewis, Washington, earlier that month. Sheehan's son, Army Spc. Casey Sheehan, was killed in Iraq in April 2004.

Drudge quoted Sheehan seemingly speaking glowingly of Bush: "'I now know (Bush is) sincere about wanting freedom for the Iraqis,' Cindy said after their meeting. 'I know he's sorry and feels some pain for our loss. And I know he's a man of faith,' " and, "For the first time in 11 weeks, they felt whole again. 'That was the gift the president gave us, the gift of happiness, of being together,' Cindy said." Drudge contrasted these quotes to Sheehan's statements on the August 7 edition of CNN's Late Edition with Wolf Blitzer, in which she said, of the 2004 meeting with Bush: "We wanted to use the time for him to know that he killed an indispensable part of our family and humanity."

Drudge, however, took Sheehan's quotes from The Reporter out of context in falsely claiming a shift in her position. The June 24, 2004, Reporter article also quoted Sheehan expressing her misgivings about Bush and the Iraq war:


(snip)

Throughout the day on Aug. 8, Drudge's false story needed little time to spread to conservative Weblogs:


-- Drudge posted the Sheehan item on August 8 at 10:11 am ET.


-- Right-wing pundit Michelle Malkin posted the item on her Weblog one hour later, at 11:22 a.m. ET.


-- At 12:40 p.m. ET, the Drudge story appeared on C-Log, the Weblog of the conservative news and commentary Web site Townhall.com.


-- At 2:33 p.m. ET, MooreWatch.com posted the story.


-- At 3:23 p.m. ET, William Quick of DailyPundit.com posted the story.

(snip)



link to complete statement: http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/usnw/20050811/pl_usnw/media_matters_for_america__cindy_sheehan__changed_her_story_on_bush____tracking_a_lie_through_the_conservative_media109_xml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ecoalex Donating Member (718 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hate to burst your bubble , but she did gush over the shrub
This is a repost

I don't see that Drudge did misquote Ms Sheehan from the publication that carried her quote.Let's be honest, credibility is important, emotions are not rational.Factually Cindy did say what was quoted by Drudge, as much as you may not like it, Sheehan had a change of heart, all Drudge was saying, a fact..

http://www.thereporter.com/search/ci_2923921 Article Launched: 06/24/2004 06:00:00 AM

in the meeting. Shortly after Casey died, Bush sent the family a form letter expressing his condolences, and Cindy said she felt it was an impersonal gesture.

"I now know he's sincere about wanting freedom for the Iraqis," Cindy said after their meeting. "I know he's sorry and feels some pain for our loss. And I know he's a man of faith."

The meeting didn't last long, but in their time with Bush, Cindy spoke about Casey and asked the president to make her son's sacrifice count for something. They also spoke of their faith.

While meeting with Bush, as well as Sen. John McCain, R-Arizona, was an honor, it was almost a tangent benefit of the trip. The Sheehans said they enjoyed meeting the other families of fallen soldiers, sharing stories, contact information, grief and support.

For some, grief was still visceral and raw, while for others it had melted into the background of their lives, the pain as common as breathing. Cindy said she saw her reflection in the troubled eyes of each.

"It's hard to lose a son," she said. "But we (all) lost a son in the Iraqi war."

The trip had one benefit that none of the Sheehans expected.

For a moment, life returned to the way it was before Casey died. They laughed, joked and bickered playfully as they briefly toured Seattle.

For the first time in 11 weeks, they felt whole again.

"That was the gift the president gave us, the gift of happiness, of being together," Cindy said.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Which proves what exactly?
So at one point she had some respect and trust in her government then she learned how despicable they really are. Good for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PunkPop Donating Member (847 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. What part of "out of context" don't you understand?
"Gush"???? She did nothing of the kind. Her words were those of a grieving mother trying to show respect to the President of the United States.

Why are you defending that scumbag Drudge? He twisted and manipulated that story for his own purposes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. Cindy? Like any woman, she has the right to change her mind!
so, suck-up and listen to what she has to say today and tomorrow and thru the Bush Vacation!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. Perhaps if Bush would change his opinion
in light of new information we wouldn't be headed to WWIII.

Only a fool clings to a belief when facts prove him to be wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. "in bed with the 'radical left'?"
:wtf:

Why the hell is this 'moran' allowed to get away with saying stuff like this?

Oh yeah, I forgot: IOKIYAR. :grr:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Where can I join up with the 'radical left'? Where are they?
I've looked and looked and looked and I can't find any 'radical left' group or organization at all! Did they storm the Supreme Court in December 2000? I don't recall hearing anything. Where are the masses of 'radical leftists' with torches and pitchforks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomKoolzip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
6. I thought that it was the 2004 meeting ITSELF which changed Sheehan's
mind. I seem to remember a thread or two about it back then, and reading that finally seeing B*sh's eyes after telling her story made her realize that he didn't give a shit about her son.

Somebody PLEASE tell me why, even if this wasn't the case, why WHY WHY it would even MATTER at all if she felt one way in 2004 and a different way now? The DSM and the deepening quagmire in Iraq are enough for a lot of people to change their minds....it's not as if Bush, who was once a coke addict and alcoholic, is gonna stay a coke addict and an alcoholic just for the sake of consistency, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
headache Donating Member (6 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. one statement I've heard is...
...that she's being used as a pawn of anti-B*sh groups who want to parade a grieving mother in front of Crawford ranch solely to humiliate the Preznident.

Because the mainstream media hasn't followed Sheehan's plight all these years, they aren't aware how deeply she holds these feelings and the extent of her commitment.

Where would the wing nuts get the idea that she was being used by left leaning groups? Maybe 'cuz that's what the fundies appear to have done with the Schindlers, Terri Schiavo's folks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC