|
Edited on Thu Aug-11-05 08:35 PM by Ready2Snap
By insulting them right off the bat, you're gonna increase your chances of getting rejected before they get to the second sentence. Oh, and don't threaten them with cancelling your subscription, for the same reason. Start by telling them how, in the past, you trusted the Times editorials and columnists to inform and enlighten you. Then express your concerns over the recent changes to the editorial section. One or two examples is all you need. You need to cite at least one example of the "horrible writing" It shouldn't be hard to find. Max Boot is my choice as a prime source of poor writing.
Michael Ramirez has been called every name in the book in LTTEs for years, but he's still there. Save him for your last complaint and use it to skewer him with a good zinger like -
"And as for Michael Ramirez, his scribblings can only appeal to what Oscar Wilde called the 'intellectually unemployed.'" Wilde, Mark Twain and Ambrose Bierce are great sources for quotes and zingers.
Try to use short, declarative sentences, in which every word does work. Or as E.B. White said, "Avoid unnecessary words." Use just enough to say what you want. Also, run-on sentences tend to confuse readers, and, if they don't understand you, they'll lose interest and move on to something else. So, keep 'em short.
Also, nothing will get your letter tossed out faster than misspellings. Use Word's Spelling and Grammar utility, and if you're not sure, go look it up or Google it. Beware of the common mistakes like using "your" when you mean "you're" or there for their. Have someone else read it. A fresh pair of eyes can discover things you may miss.
Personally, I find it easier to edit something if I print it out on paper, work out the changes, and then correct the text on screen. Don't to forget to SAVE after your changes, or you can do a SAVE AS before you do any editing and save it as: letter2.doc, that way your original draft is safe to go back to if you want. You should do at least three re-writes. The process will really help you define what it is you're trying to say.
As for the new layout, I agree it's awful. All the fat lines, negative (empty) space and the reduction of text reminds me of someone who can't stand it when his peas get in his mashed potatoes. All in all, kinda what you'd expect to find in a community college newspaper.
They have a 250 word limit, but try and keep it to 150 tops. You'll have a better chance of having it published.
If you have any questions, my e-mail is in my profile.
Have fun, good luck.
|