Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Leaving Iraq now would send the wrong message." To whom?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
bribri16 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 06:51 PM
Original message
"Leaving Iraq now would send the wrong message." To whom?
Iraqi people who already hate our guts, Al-qaeda who is at war with the "infidels?" Or does he mean to his RW-neocon-puppeteers who put him office to take over Iraq?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
reBel_gyrl Donating Member (133 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah.. that second one..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagAss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Big OIL n/m
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. Martians
The Gods of War. The Chimperor is in communication with them - sending and receiving messages while in a semi-comatose state. Fortunately, Smirkus Disgustus is able to maintain a semi-comatose state for prolonged periods. (Except when he's asleep, actually. Or out cold.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gizmo1979 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. At least change what you're
doing over their do something different instead of sending our men and women out to be targets.There has to be some strategy other then send troops out to draw fire and then chase.Didn't work in nam why would it work now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. Oh, fer cryin' out loud!
Everyone from OBL to the Iraqi people have said It's time to go now.

Get rid of military bases on their land in the ME, stop stealing their resources, stop supporting despotic regimes.

Why the *F* would they bother us after they got what they wanted, which is to be left the *F* alone.

Is it that simple? Yes, I think it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teach1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. What's the right message?
We will make up lies to invade you so watch it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. Ah, it's just warmed over cold war shit, it's the only thing they know
Edited on Thu Aug-11-05 07:04 PM by The_Casual_Observer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. To Halliburton?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
9. freepers
and his adoring bushbots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
10. Certainly not to Osama bin Laden. With all our attentions in Iraq
he's free to recruit more people who COULD actually harm the US. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
11. Corporate investors
Such as the folks Powell is now working with, regarding investing in the NWO and its amazing new opportunities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
12. The American people WE ARE the enemy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cheezus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. exactly, it would tell us that they were wrong
and they're NEVER wrong... that's their thing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagAss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
13. Will I live to see another helicopter leaving from the roof of
another building in ten years? I hope not.

I pray we have learned from the past....!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
14. Halliburton Chevron Texaco Carlyle Group
In April of 2004 the first two oil tankers that went out of Iraq went to Texaco & Chevron.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
15. No one
He lives in his own little world. He has no clue what the average American thinks thus he has no real clue as the message the war is sending.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
16. This is a ludicrous discussion,
Edited on Thu Aug-11-05 07:34 PM by Perky
Loook I am not defending the invasion it was incredbily shortsighted and stupid to think that it would be a cake walk and it certainly was nsive to think we would be treated as liberators... Worst of all it is both arrogant and extreemly naive to think that imposing a republican form of government in the middle east even with modest democratic gains would ever I mean ever be viable.

Having said that. WE HAVE TO STAY. I wish there was another course but I do not see it. It has nothing to do with saving face or oil

but this country teeters on the brink of civl war because there is no strongman government and that is ur fault. To pick up and depart would mean Iraq would turn into an old afghanistan and Baghdad into a much larger Beirut. THis is why Bush I decided not to invade.

Its not about sending the wrong message.... It it about the inevitability of this beecoming an improverished state with the Kurds creating an autonomous government in the north, el-Histani taking his cues from Teheran and Hezbollah finding fertile ground to exploit for terror training camps in the western desert with Syria's blessing. Its about Alqueda becoming entrenched in the Baghdad slums as a political forst with private armies.

This Fiasco is the worst stratgic move in US Government history. This is Bush's folly. This is nothing short of a Debabcle and a quagmire.

Oh if only idiocy was an impeachable offense.


I just do not see how we can leave because it gives the country over to warloads and thugs, Sealots and nationalists.

FOr GOd's sake did they not realize when dreaming up this lunacy that when it came to writing a constituton that the Wahabiists and the conservatives would demand that the rights of women be curtailed to conform to Islamic law?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. I disagree....
the only reason we are any where near Iraq is because of the oil in the middle-east. Money rules. Nobody in power gives a rats ass about any peoples of any country, including our own. You want to die for the haves to have more...go for it, but human lives other than your own you shouldn't be bargaining with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. You miss the point
pretty much entirely

Regradless of the reasons we went inot Iraq. It would be far worse if left. THast is not offered as a defense of the invasion. I am simply sayoing that to leavenow...because of what we have done would be even worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Missed the point?....
I do not believe that there could be more death and destruction there than exists today. And, that our presence does nothing at all to remedy that, it only exacerbates it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. If Bagdhad becomes another Beirut...
You will hear of 500 deaths aday rather then 20.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. a link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC