Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is there a thread on today's USA Today * story?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
AverageJoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 09:24 AM
Original message
Is there a thread on today's USA Today * story?
I saw the paper inside a rack this morning and read the story down to the fold. Apparently Bush spoke to the media yesterday and talked about Cindy. I think the story said he spoke in "unusually personal tones," or some such thing, about her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. don't know about any other threads, but USA Today must have meant
that he actually said her name. However he continued his generic crap calling Casey Sheehan 'loved one' as well as all the other dead US troops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AverageJoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thank you
Was it a press conference or did he just slither outside, garble a mini-speech and slither back under his rock?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. He specifically said her name, "Mrs. Sheehan". or at least the
quote in the paper said it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. I saw video and he actually pronounced "SheeHAN" correctly
which is why they probably didn't change much else of his shallow spiel that he's been giving over the years.

The handlers can only do so much with his limitations. They had him say "Mrs. Sheehan" correctly and even tried to list all the iterations of "loved ones" by saying, "sons and daughters ... brothers and sisters ..." (might have said 'moms and dads') he had some hesitation coughing those up.

In the end, he was still with 'loved ones' which Cindy has stated is so offensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. The text of his comments was definitely written by someone with
more skills than * possesses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildwww2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
3. You can`t get much more personal than sending folks to die for a lie!
Bu$h is not a very personal person. He is a beast. And will continue to beastly things until "We the People" become personal enough about his war crime to stop him. I did send money and a support letter to Cindy Sheehan by the way. And I will continue to do more.
Peace
Wildman
Al Gore is My President
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. If one examines his comments about the war, it is apparent
he never speaks in personal tones about it. He always uses phrases that sound oblique, not personal, as if we don't have anything invested in the war and casualties.

"I understand the anguish that some feel about the death that takes place," Bush said "I have heard the voices of those saying: Pull out now! and i've thought about their cry and their sincere desire to reduce the loss of life by pulling our troops out. I just strongly disagree."

"...the death that takes place" is an example of his indirect phrasing that attempts to depersonalize it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. I read the article this morning.
The interesting thing was that there were two full articles, one on the left, showing and quoting Cindy and one on the right with Bush. They were the same size, appeared to have equal prominence. The paper was obviously depicting this as a dialog between the two, not unlike some of the exchanges in the media between U.S. officials and Saddam Hussein. As far as I could tell, the piece was not biased. It was the most visible presentation in the print media I've seen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AverageJoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Oh, cool
I didn't even notice the story about Cindy. Now it looks like I'll have to pony up fifty cents and buy a copy.

Thanks for letting me know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC