Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senators Kennedy & Kerry push * to meet with Cindy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 12:16 PM
Original message
Senators Kennedy & Kerry push * to meet with Cindy
http://news.bostonherald.com/national/view.bg?articleid=97671

Bush pressed to meet protester mom
By Dave Wedge
Friday, August 12, 2005

Pressure continued to mount for President Bush to meet with the distraught mom of a soldier killed in Iraq as both Bay State senators backed the woman and scores of families joined her outside Bush's Texas home, including two from Massachusetts. Sen. Edward M. Kennedy and Sen. John F. Kerry yesterday each threw their support behind Cindy Sheehan, who has been camped outside Bush's Crawford, Texas, home since Saturday, vowing not to leave until the president meets with her about the war. Sheehan's 24-year-old Marine son, Casey, was killed five days after he arrived in Iraq. ``The president has not leveled with our troops and the American people,'' Kennedy said. ``I admire Cindy Sheehan for her courage and determination to make the president answer to her.'' Kerry spokeswoman April Boyd said: ``Senator Kerry understands the demands on Bush's schedule but hopes he will take time to meet with Mrs. Sheehan.''

Speaking with reporters at his ranch yesterday, Bush expressed sympathy but made no concessions. White House aides met with Sheehan, which she described as ``pointless.'' ``She feels strongly about her position. And she has every right in the world to say what she believes,'' Bush said. But, he said, pulling out of Iraq now would be a ``mistake.'' ``One way to honor the fallen is to lay the foundation for peace,'' he said.

Sheehan was joined by soldiers' families who oppose the war, including a Hyannis mom whose son is being deployed next week and the wife and daughters of a Massachusetts National Guard sergeant from Billerica who is in Iraq. Rose Gonzalez, whose mother is serving north of Baghdad with the National Guard, called Sheehan ``inspiring.'' ``It's not too much to ask a president sending all these people into harm's way, to ask for time to speak with him,'' said Gonzalez, who will speak at a vigil on Boston Common tomorrow night to honor Sheehan. ``She lost a 24-year-old son. He was just a baby.''

Boston Mobilization organized the vigil to raise awareness and help military families who want to join Sheehan. Spokeswoman Eve Lyman said Bush should give her the courtesy of a meeting. "I can't believe Bush has been so stupid to not come out and talk to her yet and diffuse the whole thing,'' Lyman said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Waya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nice of them....
...but it be even nicer if maybe they could get themselves down to Crawford and exchange a few words with the woman and the supporters. Just to further rile the Bush Worshippers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Waya
welcome to DU

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Excellent suggestion!
Welcome to DU! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. THANKS, Guys.....
:dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. No, I don't want them to "Frist" the event
This is good. This is better, actually. I don't want what Cindy is doing to be muddied into a political circus.

I'm glad they spoke up though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. my thoughts exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. That'd take away from Cindy's message - the media would spin it into
something completely unrecognizable.

Frist and Santorum were spun into sincere saints by the corporate media.

Kerry and Kennedy would be desperate Democrats trying to get a jump on Hillary Clinton for 2008.

Sad that we know exactly what we can expect from the whores.

Cindy's doing great right now...let's stay on track with her cause.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. This time they really do need to stay low key- but I'm glad they spoke up.
I'm glad they have an opinion- we at least need to hear that.

Cindy is getting plenty of attention w/o "Star DEMs"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pat_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Cool!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. The herald also had a terrible piece about Cindy as well. At least
Edited on Fri Aug-12-05 12:27 PM by GreenPartyVoter
they bothered to cover this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
20. Reporters are less biased than the editorial page which is decidely RW.
Edited on Fri Aug-12-05 08:00 PM by blm
However, in the Herald's case, just slightly less biased than Moonie Times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. Actually, it's agood thing......
To see them lend their names in support of Ms. Sheehan. But, I don't want the Idiot in Chief swayed by anyone into meeting with her.

I want to see how big this movement gets when she follows the Idiot in Chief back to DC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Independent_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. Good!
I knew Kennedy and Kerry would jump on this eventually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
9. Link to same story in LBN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobo4u Donating Member (93 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yeah, and maybe she can ask Kerry why he voted for the war.
Kerry's almost as culpable as Bush. The hypocrisy never ceases to amaze me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Just Kerry? Not the rest of the folks who voted for it? Reid?
Our Minority Leader? Oh, that's right. People like him. So he doesn't count.

No, Kerry didn't lie to Congress. Kerry's not profiteering off this venture. Making such a claim diminishes what Bush and his gang have done. Those who voted based on crap information given to them by liars are not in the same boat as Bush.

Bush gets to sit in that boat with the rest of his neocon pals. Not with Kerry, or Edwards, or Reid, or any of the rest. Let him look at Rummy's ugly mug as he rows himself to hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Really? You mean the IWR was to blame and not Bush's failure to implement
the IWR honestly?

And here I thought Bush lied his way around the IWR guidelines for weapons inspections and that he alone would make the determination AFTER the inspections that war was NECESSARY for national security in a letter presented to Congress.


Gee...in that case, Bush is honest and hasn't done anything to be impeached, either. It was all the fault of the IWR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. I disagree with Kerry's vote- but I dont see it that way.
Kerry did not lie to the Congress, UN and American people.

Kerry did not forge documents.

Kerry did not out CIA agents.

Kerry did not manipulate the media into "selling" this war.

Kerry should have voted "no"- I agree with that-

But "almost as cupable as Bush?" Not by a long shot.

Hypocrisy? How? When has Kerry refused to speak to vets or their relatives? When has Kerry put down dissenters?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. Photo of Kerry & Ted's "Hypocrisy"
Edited on Fri Aug-12-05 06:06 PM by Dr Fate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Your post makes clear - Kerry and Kennedy understand accountability
and show it in ways that Bush will NEVER emulate....... unless he can wring some political gain out of it from the media who worships his every move.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
18. I'm glad these DEMs agree with the base on this. Thanks John & Ted!
!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC