|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Cyrano (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-12-05 03:54 PM Original message |
Would Bush use nuclear weapons? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcane1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-12-05 03:55 PM Response to Original message |
1. fuck yes he would, and his cultish admirers would love him even more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
etherealtruth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-12-05 03:57 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Agreed ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Midlodemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-12-05 04:05 PM Response to Reply #1 |
17. Agreed. He is a complete sociopath without conscience. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-12-05 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
2. I think he's jonesing to nuke someone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-12-05 05:05 PM Response to Reply #2 |
28. And as much as he would like to, he doesn't dare nuke ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
driver8 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-12-05 09:04 PM Response to Reply #2 |
30. I agree...if he nukes someone, that will prove to everyone what a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeanQuinn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-12-05 03:57 PM Response to Original message |
4. Maybe. And I only say maybe for political reasons. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcane1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-12-05 04:31 PM Response to Reply #4 |
26. "If there are some fundies who think it out..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ironman202 (608 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-12-05 03:57 PM Response to Original message |
5. these are the same people who proposed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemonFighterLives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-12-05 03:58 PM Response to Original message |
6. Yes, He's itching to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H5N1 (777 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-12-05 03:59 PM Response to Original message |
7. Not only would he - he wants to! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lockdown (576 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-12-05 04:00 PM Response to Original message |
8. Too right he (they) would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-12-05 04:00 PM Response to Original message |
9. Bush is a rotten murdering lying bastard, but come on now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cyrano (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-12-05 04:06 PM Response to Reply #9 |
18. Oh? I would have thought that attacking a country that did nothing to us |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-12-05 04:00 PM Response to Original message |
10. Well, I'd hope ANY President "would" use nuclear weapons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Booster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-12-05 04:01 PM Response to Original message |
11. I think Cheney will do without even telling Bush. Cheney will do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wli (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-12-05 04:02 PM Response to Original message |
12. yes, he doesn't care about civilian casualties |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Straight Story (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-12-05 04:02 PM Response to Original message |
13. Maybe on us..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emdee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-12-05 04:03 PM Response to Original message |
14. My first thought to your question was, "In a heartbeat".... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-12-05 04:04 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Ditto |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CityZen-X (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-12-05 04:04 PM Response to Original message |
15. Kissinger & Nixon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
punpirate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-12-05 04:06 PM Response to Original message |
19. My best guess is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yorkiemommie1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-12-05 04:07 PM Response to Original message |
20. Well, we know Cheney wants to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1956 (314 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-12-05 04:21 PM Response to Reply #20 |
25. in fact |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MisterP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-12-05 04:07 PM Response to Original message |
21. Mister President, we cannot allow a mine shaft gap!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MN ChimpH8R (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-12-05 04:10 PM Response to Original message |
22. Absolutely, he would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughBeaumont (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-12-05 04:13 PM Response to Original message |
23. Emphasis on anyplace else they considered a "threat?". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftylady (281 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-12-05 04:15 PM Response to Original message |
24. In a New York Minute |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-12-05 05:04 PM Response to Original message |
27. It was long ago noted that the U.S. has repeatedly used nukes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kerrytravelers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-12-05 05:05 PM Response to Original message |
29. Thinking nothng of it... boom. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Jan 13th 2025, 12:29 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC