Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is it true that relieving a 4-Star General from command requires POTUS...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 09:44 PM
Original message
Is it true that relieving a 4-Star General from command requires POTUS...
Edited on Sat Aug-13-05 09:54 PM by DeepModem Mom
personal approval? We were told this by persons connected with military personnel. Can anyone confirm this?

(Please see this NYT story about General Byrne, "NYT: General Disobeyed Orders to End Affair, Officials Say"

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x1698129

and other threads in GD, and listed on the Greatest Page, if you need background on this strange and puzzling story.)


On edit: The people who were speaking, who are not at a high level, but have direct knowledge of the General on-the-job, are upset. They have great respect and admiration for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. " Army Training and Doctrine Command "
Just a crazythought, but could the reason behind all this have something to do with the yet unreleased photos?

I'm not sure what Army Training and Doctrine Command entails.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. These people said the General was in charge of Army training. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yes, but what's "Doctrine Command"???
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. it develiops things such as proper formations when facing
an enemy.. heck TRADOC manuals can be fascinating all on their own
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Oh, alright....
That shows how much I know about the military. :blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. You've seen the FM (field manual) on survival at Barnes
and Noble? That is a TRADOC publication.

Some are classified, but you can get old editions at any surplus store
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. I have it....
Edited on Sat Aug-13-05 10:13 PM by madeline_con
I found out I have tropical plants in my yard that are edible. But I'm not going to tear them up unless food gets scarce. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Same here -- anybody else know?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burried News Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ike removed Patton - twice I believe.
This 4 star was not a theater commander - not sure if that is a factor or not.
My guess is Schoonmaker or Rummy wanted him gone and possibly wanted to use him to make a point about sexual harassment and fraternization issues. Consider recent Air Force Academy scandals for example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darkhawk32 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I thought Patton was only a 3-star when he was relieved those times... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Patton was not a four star when he was removed, he was a two
star during the NA campaigh and a three star after Sicily
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burried News Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #7
20. I think you and the previous poster are correct. Besides Ike was
a five star then and there is no equivalent today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. You mean allowing the rape of children in Iraq prisons is not
a type of sexual harassment that justifies removal of a leader from the military?

Just wondering!

If it is a "sex" thing, Rummey approved of what happened at the prisons, so he should be gone!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. I thought all of that
went up to the top? Didn't a Clinton advisor say that everything with Gitmo and Abu Grhaib go to the top?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Exactly my point. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burried News Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. Well we don't want to admit that any abuse was ordered from
above - it was just the actions of some deviant troops.:sarcasm:

You are right the contradictions are mind numbing - what an infernal shameful miserable mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. Not sure
My guess would be that he could probably be temporarily removed from his assignment by the Chief of the Army, but confirmation would have to come from SECDEF or POTUS.

Remember, any general 3 stars or above is appointed by presidential nomination and congressional confirmation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. this means they relieved a popular officer
hmmm... this is getting curiouser and curioser
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peregrine Donating Member (712 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
13. The Army Chief of Staff can remove anybody in the Army
TRADOC is a major command that oversees all of the Army schools. The Army has sever major commands: INSCOM (intelligence units), FORCOM (combat units). All of the commanders of the major commands fall of the Army Chief of Staff.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. There are several kinds of major commands
You have Theatre and Area Commands, like US Army Europe, 8th US Army, and Forces Command. This is where your combat power resides. All these commands are led by Generals. These commands run everything in that area, but they've got no influence outside that area. For instance, 8th Imperial Army is responsible for everything in Korea. (And they will remind you of that. Repeatedly.) Unfortunately for the General that runs it, his sphere of influence ends at the water's edge.

Next, you have Functional Area Commands, like Intelligence and Security Command, Medical Command and Criminal Investigative Command. These are usually led by Major Generals. A Functional Area Command does one particular thing like spy on the enemy or provide healthcare, but it's spread out worldwide.

Then you have your Systems and Logistics Commands, like Tank and Automotive Command and Materiel Command. They specialize in systems. Tank and Automotive Command is responsible for anything that moves over the ground. They buy car parts. Truck parts. Tires. They develop specifications for new vehicles. They test the candidate vehicles when they come back from the designer. It is a very important command--BUT! They've got no troops to speak of. They fight no wars. They are as purely administrative as something in the Army can be, and most of the people who work there aren't in the Army.

Now let's talk Training and Doctrine Command. This is the weirdest command in the whole army. It's a functional area command in that it's responsible for all the schools. But it envelops the army. From the day you raise your hand to the day you turn in your short-time calendar, TRADOC will affect your life in some way. They write the Physical Training test standards. They write the Common Task Training manual. They set the standards for your job. This is why the TRADOC commander is a General and not a Major General.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Interesting, jmowreader. This command "envelops the army." nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burried News Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #16
22. There has been some conversation of how the Field Manual
Edited on Sun Aug-14-05 08:05 AM by Burried News
for the handling of prisoners (which as I understand it is in agreement with the Geneva Convention) forbids what is going on in Abu Ghraib, Bagram and other prisons under Army control. This manual is now an embarassment to the leadership that allowed the abuse of prisoners and theoretically could be evidence for those worried about the Hague.

Also in the past year a Major General was demoted to Colonel for sexual harassment but there were rumors at the time that he was a voice objecting to prisoner abuse and the charges were payback for his failure to tow the line on the abuse issue.

I don't know what to make of the story yet but it is worth pursuing.

PS Nice Post. Appreciate it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC