Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cindy gets her answer...not with a meeting, but with a whimper.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Career Prole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 11:06 PM
Original message
Cindy gets her answer...not with a meeting, but with a whimper.
U.S. Lowers Sights On What Can Be Achieved in Iraq

Administration Is Shedding 'Unreality' That Dominated Invasion, Official Says

By Robin Wright and Ellen Knickmeyer
Washington Post Staff Writers
Sunday, August 14, 2005; A01


The Bush administration is significantly lowering expectations of what can be achieved in Iraq, recognizing that the United States will have to settle for far less progress than originally envisioned during the transition due to end in four months, according to U.S. officials in Washington and Baghdad.

The United States no longer expects to see a model new democracy, a self-supporting oil industry or a society where the majority of people are free from serious security or economic challenges, U.S. officials say.

"What we expected to achieve was never realistic given the timetable or what unfolded on the ground," said a senior official involved in policy since the 2003 invasion. "We are in a process of absorbing the factors of the situation we're in and shedding the unreality that dominated at the beginning."

<snip>

U.S. officials say no turning point forced a reassessment. "It happened rather gradually," said the senior official, triggered by everything from the insurgency to shifting budgets to U.S. personnel changes in Baghdad.


"Administration Is Shedding 'Unreality' That Dominated Invasion"

No one here needs to be reminded who created that "unreality".

This "democracy" was supposed to be it, right? The "noble cause"?

It was WMD's and al Qaeda connections...then it wasn't.

It was WMD programs...then it wasn't.

It was to depose Saddam Hussein's regime...then it wasn't.

Finally, it was winnowed down to bringing democracy to Iraq...now, with no fanfare, it isn't.

Tell me, please...what was it all for? Nah, screw it.

Don't tell me.

Tell Cindy Sheehan. All she wanted to know is what "noble cause" bush was referring to last week...the one her son died for.

Tell all those thousands upon thousands of grieving people on both sides of the world what the "noble cause" was.

Tell our soldiers. Tell the Iraqis.

They are quite literally dying to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. They died for Halliburton and greed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. "shedding the unreality" = "waking up and smelling the coffee"
It's too little, too late. We told you so. You wouldn't listen. Now go talk to Ms. Sheehan and tell her how dreadfully sorry you are.

Yeah, right, like that's going to happen. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. actually, it = "methadone"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. The goal now
"is to ensure a constitution that can be easily amended later."


What a fucking waste of life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
4. Bush should hand out barf bags at his next press conference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KitchenWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
5. And they called Kerry a flip-flopper
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
6. The UN-Reality!!!!!!!!!!?????
WTF does THAT mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Career Prole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. UN-realities? It's like our UN-treaties and the UN-Geneva Conventions
and our UN-freedoms. Someone in the White House sticks an "UN" in front to make something go away. Ask any repuke...it's all the UN's fault! ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
7. And, of course, Bush has to "go on with is life" instead of meet her
Bush: Can't meet Cindy because he must "go on with my life"
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2007296
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
9. Did I read this correctly?
Is this Mission Abandoned? Are we manning the lifeboats?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Career Prole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Certainly sounds like it...any women and children still alive may enter
the boats first. Immediately after all WH appointees and Halliburton employees, that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ahem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
12. Not a lie, not a mistake, heck, not even a misunderstanding, it was an
unreality. Can't possibly use a term that makes it sound like they were wrong in any way. Well, it's certainly unreal, I'll give them that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
13. Unbelievable!!
So we can expect apologies to one hundred thousand or more Iraqi families, US troops, tortured prisoners.

How about all those who were fired or smeared for trying to reason with these idiots? Larry Lindsey, Paul O'Neill, Richard Clark, General Zinni, General Shinseki, General Byrne? The dead reporters, the ones who resigned, were let go ~

The families of the troops ~ the list is long ~

And when do the impeachment proceedings begin?

There should be OUTRAGE over this.

But it isn't Bush or Cheney, or Rumsfeld saying all of this. It seems lately that people are just speaking out on their own. Something is going on that we don't know about, I think.

Eg, Abramoff was indicted this week, which will no doubt affect Tom Delay, their hitman in Congress. At the same time, Hastert has been accused of ethics violations, the Senate leader and third in line for the presidency.

If indictments were handed down by the grand jury in the Plame case, and among them were Bush and Cheney, and Hastert was no longer available, who would replace Bush?

All this is either a huge coincidence or it was planned ~ and then there was that suspicious story about General Byrne. I don't want to get my hopes up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Career Prole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. There may indeed be outrage...this article is brand-spankin' new.
I hope it gets some air on the Sunday talk circuit this morning.
The 30-something percent who still thought invading Iraq was worth it thought so because of the democracy "sub-rationale", one must think.

They are also the ones who believed most deeply in bush.

I don't think they'll be quiet in their disappointment. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC