who wrote
The Population Bomb? Well, I didn't realize he took his PhD at Kansas University (where I teach English, BTW).
He has a letter to the editor in today's
Lawrence Journal-World, mocking the recent Kansas Board of Education's decision on teaching Intelligent Design in Kansas schools:
http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2005/aug/14/malign_design/?letters_to_editorMalign Design
Sunday, August 14, 2005
To the editor:
I have a message for members of the Kansas School Board. As a biologist with a Ph.D. from Kansas University (1953), I wish to support the teaching of the theory that the world was created by the Flying Spaghetti Monster — about which you have already heard from Bobby Henderson (www.venganza.org). It seems to me that the very existence of the evolution-creation controversy and that many of you support teaching “intelligent design” as science, is in itself a powerful argument against intelligent design. Rather, it supports my more scientific theory of malign design (proven by thousands of years of theologians generating theodicies and the creation of George W. Bush).
But a scientist must keep an open mind, and it would bother me if children in Kansas were not exposed to the critical issue raised by the existence of the Flying Spaghetti Monster (FSM), but not emphasized by Henderson. If we need a malign designer like FSM to explain Dubya, don’t we need a super malign designer to create the FSM (MDFSM)? And then a superduper malign designer to design that malign designer (SDMDFSM)? And so on, the way back.
We owe it to our children to make them learn about each malign designer in turn, so they can grasp the true magnificence of the Flying Spaghetti Monster those designers created and which then created us all.
I trust you will add these issues to what promises to be a great scientific curriculum in a state long poisoned by having among its scientists some of the great figures of evolutionary biology.
Paul R. Ehrlich,
Bing Professor of Population Studies
Stanford University,
Stanford, Calif.
BTW, you might also be interested in the essay I wrote for my
Teacher, Teacher website after the first time the Kansas BOE pulled a stunt like this back in 1999:
"Scopes Revisited?: The Kansas Board of Education's 1999 Decision on Evolution"http://teacherblue.homestead.com/scopes.htmlThere was a lot of confusion back then about exactly what the BOE decision entailed, and this piece clarifies that.
I also point out that most Americans neglect to vote in local and state elections, although those elections are
very important:
The Republicans who won their primaries against the BOE incumbents campaigned specifically on that issue, promising to undo what last year's BOE decision had done. That is evidence that the revised standards were pushed through by a committed activist minority, while an apathetic majority simply was not paying attention.
Too many Americans discount the significance of local--or even state--elections, and vote only in prominent national races. But local and state elections are the training ground for those who will move into positions of power at the national level. And although national elections are important, those who hold political office at the local and state levels have a more direct and noticeable impact on a citizen's day-to day life.
At the end of the essay I also make this prediciton, which, unfortunately, has proved to be true:
The Kansas Board of Education's decision was a wake-up call to Kansans of diverse political persuasions, and it got them to the polls to vote for BOE candidates who would restore macroevolution to the state's testing standards. But people are busy--and perhaps a little lazy, too. The public will probably doze off again, until some other widely publicized political decision reminds them that it is dangerous to neglect our responsiblity to participate in the political process.