Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What's up with the whole Curt Weldon thing, I missed that news tidbit.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
JohnnyBoots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 10:29 AM
Original message
What's up with the whole Curt Weldon thing, I missed that news tidbit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TomPainesBones Donating Member (260 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. I wouldn't mind knowing myself
Edited on Sun Aug-14-05 11:03 AM by TomPainesBones
The silence here is disconcerting


Any updates?

Anyone?

Bueller?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyBoots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Easy there Ben Stein
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goose3five Donating Member (125 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. The bottom line is...
Weldon is using the Able Danger story to try and pin the 9/11 attacks - or more accurately their lack of prevention - on the Clinton administration.

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/09/politics/09intel.html?pagewanted=all

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/11/politics/11intel.html?pagewanted=all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Also you must put what he says in the context of Weldon's actual position
Edited on Sun Aug-14-05 11:14 AM by blm
as a longtime propaganda carrier who is a close ally of RevMoon's. He and Bill Gertz (Moon's #1 'True Son') have always put out diversionary stories blaming Clinton some time before the facts come out against Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomPainesBones Donating Member (260 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I don't disagree with that
Edited on Sun Aug-14-05 11:19 AM by TomPainesBones
But this attack the messenger crap is for rightwing pussies. I want some facts to counter with - so I can bash them over the head with them like it was a 30 pound mahogany table leg. This 'wait and see' attitude is so unlike DU, and quite frankly has me concerned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. if there are no real facts to back up Weldon, because it's untrue, why
would you expect countering facts to something that didn't happen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomPainesBones Donating Member (260 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Weldon is charging
that the Pentagon kept info from the FBI.
The 9/11 Commission calls Weldon's source unreliable because he got some travel dates wrong.
And that's where things seem to stand. That's just not good enough when you're fighting Cromags. Are the travel dates truly wrong? Did the Pentagon keep info from the FBI?
That's what I want to know.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. But we can only research what are KNOWN facts.
We shouldn't be expected to post what is not known at this time, unless we preface it as speculation or personal opinion.

Be concerned that noone in the media has a handle on the facts, and encourage THEM to publish what is known.

We cannot attempt that without SOMETHING more concrete that is available to us.

I base MY opinion on Weldon's longtime record as a propagandist who carries water for Moon, and his alliance with another PROLIFIC PROPAGANDIST working for RevMoon, Bill Gertz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomPainesBones Donating Member (260 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Great,
so as it stands our defense is "He said/They said" "Liar liar, pants on fire" and "Lets wait for the MEDIA to fill in the blanks for us". I do appreciate your input blm, but this is not the best of positions. I'm still concerned about this. It's getting out of hand everywhere on the Internet except here, and our talking points suddenly sound like theirs. But I'll just let it go for now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. We HAVE no talking points...that should be obvious to you by now.
And I'd be ashamed if all we did here was use tallking points ...in fact, I wouldn't be here at all, I'd be a freeper who repeats whatever spin Rove directs Drudge and the Moonies to spread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomPainesBones Donating Member (260 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Well, I guess it's just the definition
I consider these to be just a few of some damn good FACTUAL talking points. And I use them often...


February 26th, 2001, Paul Bremer (Co-chairman of the National Commission on Terrorism, Head of the Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq) while speaking at the McCormick Tribune Foundation Conference on Terrorism stated: "The new administration seems to be paying no attention to the problem of terrorism. What they will do is stagger along until there's a major incident and then suddenly say, 'Oh, my God, shouldn't we be organized to deal with this?' (1)

May 5th, 2001, Bush rejected the Hart-Rudman report, a two and a half year study on the threat of terrorism, considered to be the most in-depth security analysis since the National Security Act of 1947, which created the National Security Council and the CIA. The fourteen member panel of intelligence and military experts, coming to the conclusion that "Americans will likely die on American soil, possibly in large numbers," recommended many improvements in our defenses (enacted since 9/11), including the creation of a National Homeland Security Agency. (2)

In the Summer of 2001, warnings of an al Qaeda attack in the United States using multiple aircraft as weapons began pouring in from international intelligence agencies all over the world, including: Germany, Russia (3) Jordan, Morocco (4) Israel (5) and Britain. (6) From 1994 through 2001 U.S. intelligence agencies were aware of numerous threats that al Qaeda could use airplanes as weapons against the United States. (7)

August 6th, 2001, Bush received a briefing from the CIA titled "Bin Laden Determined To Strike In The U.S.," which emphasized that al Qaeda hoped to "bring the fight to America." Hijackings were mentioned specifically. When White House press secretary Ari Fleischer stated the title of the document to reporters in May 2002, he left out the word "In." (8)

In the middle of unprecedented warnings of a major terrorist attack in the United States coming from numerous international intelligence sources, what does Bush do? He takes a one month vacation. A one month vacation after being in office for roughly six months. A one month vacation after the most contested election in history. This is the longest presidential vacation in thirty two years - just shy of the record held by Richard Nixon who beats Bush by one day. (9)

FBI Director and counter-terrorism chief John O'Neill resigned in protest of the Bush administration because he believed they were obstructing the prosecution of terrorism. (10)

September 10th, 2001, John Ashcroft refused a $58 million request from the FBI for counter-terrorism funding and proposed cutting $64 million in state and local counter-terrorism grants. (11)

Despite the fact that Condoleezza Rice said on May 16, 2002 "I don't think anybody could have predicted that they would try to use an airplane as a missile, a hijacked airplane as a missile" there was a mountain of evidence to the contrary. In October 2000, the Pentagon conducted a mock terrorist attack using a simulated plane crash into a model of the Pentagon. The exercise was called "The Pentagon Mass Casualty Exercise." (12) In September 1999, a federal report titled the "Sociology and Psychology of Terrorism" stated that al Qaeda suicide bombers might hijack an airliner and dive bomb it into the Pentagon, CIA headquarters, or the White House. (13)

Richard Clarke, Bush's former top anti-terrorism adviser, has condemned the administration's stance on the war on terror. Clarke, who served as deputy assistant and assistant Secretary of State in both the Reagan and Bush Sr. administrations, and was held over by both the Clinton and Bush administrations as their terrorism czars, holds the record as the longest continuously serving senior White House staff member. (14) He has a 30 year history in government service. In March 2004 Clarke said: "Frankly, I find it outrageous that the president is running for re-election on the grounds that he's done such great things about terrorism. He ignored it. He ignored terrorism for months, when maybe we could have done something to stop 9/11. (15)

(1) http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4871819/
(2) http://www.guardian.co.uk/wtccrash/story/0,1300,561758,00.html
(3) http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,53065,00.html
(4) http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/0523/p11s01-coop.html
(5) http://portal.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2001/09/16/wcia16.xml
(6) http://www.sundayherald.com/24822
(7) http://www.wanttoknow.info/020919wsj.orig
(8) http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A35744-2002May17¬Found=true
(9) http://billstclair.com/911timeline/2001/wpost080701.html
(10) http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0201/08/ltm.05.html
(11) http://www.americanprogress.org/site/pp.asp?c=biJRJ8OVF&b=33582
(12) http://www.mdw.army.mil/news/Contingency_Planning.html
(13) http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/05/17/attack/main509471.shtml
(14) http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A17694-2003Mar12
(15) http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/03/19/60minutes/main607356.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I was speaking specifically to Weldon claim. BTW...you missed Jan30, 2001
Bush is handed the Hart-Rudman Report on Global Terror - he refuses to read it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomPainesBones Donating Member (260 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Okay then
But I did get the Hart/Rudman report in there.
It just wasn't until May 5th, 2001 that it was officially rejected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyBoots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. The guy went to my high school, he is a douche.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
12. I heard some lady reporter on FOX this morning say he was...
not credible to a lot of people because he had passed info to the FBI and to the Canadian government in the past that turned out not to be true. I had not heard that before but if it came from FOX, it must be true, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
16. another neocon liar n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC