Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anything but Wilson....Fox is talking about everything but....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-03 07:16 PM
Original message
Anything but Wilson....Fox is talking about everything but....
Fair and Balanced. It's so obvious that they have their fucking heads in the sand. What an American embarrassment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-03 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. I thought their motto was "Totally Without Merit"
as established in the Fox v. Franken case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-03 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. LOL. . .
. . .not only might they be covering for the White House, the could very well be avoiding the story as not to give CNN extra publicity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-03 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. question
I heard Novak this afternoon claim that the woman was a CIA analyst, the implication being she wasn't really undercover so exposing her wasn't a big deal. I don't care what her actual title is/was, I only want to know whether or not she was a covert employee. Anyone know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthseeker1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-03 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Novak even went so far
as to imply she could even be a secretary!! That guy is such a smug asshole. Now does anyone think for a minute that there would be this much hoopla over this story if she was anything BUT an undercover agent? If she was just an analyst or a secretary, that could be proven immediately and the case dismissed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-03 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Analysts are desk jockeys. She spent a lot of time overseas.
international business, you know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tableturner Donating Member (199 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-03 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Fineman said...
On Hardball, Howard Fineman said that his sources in the White House, who not only were in a position to know, but who also have been reliable, said that Plame is indeed an operative and not an analyst. He also said that from what he is hearing, there is open, internal warfare within the White House. Supporting that is the Washington Post article quoting a White House source confirming that someone from the White House did in fact call the reporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
number6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-03 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. Faux snooze...
idiots at work
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-03 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. Fox may be ignoring the story...
...but ABC, CBS, and NBC aren't. All of them featured it as their lead-off story on the evening news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-03 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. You gotta love it....The arrogance....there's your compassion
Squirm George, Squirm Rove Squirm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC