Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sen. Biden: Send MORE troops to Iraq!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 05:40 PM
Original message
Sen. Biden: Send MORE troops to Iraq!
Two top U.S. lawmakers on Sunday called for more American troops to be sent to Iraq, but the head of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee said that was "very unlikely."

Sens. Joseph Biden and John McCain said there were not enough U.S. forces to fend off insurgent attacks and not enough Iraqi forces are trained to take over from the 138,000 U.S. soldiers there.

Biden, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee ranking Democrat, said fewer than 3,000 Iraqis are fully trained to take over from their American counterparts.

"We have another probably 20 to 30 battalions out there that, with embedded U.S. military, are able to do a serious, positive job. After that, it falls off the cliff," the Delaware senator said on NBC'S "Meet the Press."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20050814/ts_nm/iraq_usa_forces_dc&printer=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why can't he go enlist himself?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. He's kinda old (though I remember that pic of that one old man in combat)
but his son is the perfect age. IIRC, he's in his thirties. Perfect age for this.

Instead his son works at MBNA I believe...Yeah, the bastards that basically wrote that bill that passed several months ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good old Joe! At least he's consistent in his lap-doggedness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagAss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. He on course to get about 6% of the New Hamphire Primary vote..
:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. Can't ya just feel the new round of Joementum?!
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. In a way, he's right
We went in unprepared.

The real sound-bite from Biden is that we're stuck there, and Iraq has fewer than 3000 of its own able to take over from the Coalition of the Willing. That's even more pitiful than the under-manned and under-trained ARVN during Nixon's "Vietnamization" of that war.

We sent 150-odd-thousand troops into a charnal house bare-ass naked, and thought we'd have the Iraqis throwing flowers at us instead of blowing as many of those troops' limbs and heads off as they can.

The next stop is Iran, which will require upwards of a million troops to occupy.

In the military, I believe they call this a "clusterfuck".

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nosmokes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. no, he's not right.
bushole/rummy definitely went in without enough troops and that is a large part of why iraq is such a fucked up place today, but that doesn't mean that sending more troops NOW is gonna be able to fix it. the resistance is growing and it will continue to grow as long as iraq is occupied by foreign, especially american, troops. we need to get the hell outta there if america withdrew i say the terrorism against civilians would cease within a matter of weeks. one thing i know for sure. as long as we're there, or a puppet govenment we installed is in power, there will be no peace in iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Panda1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. It's true we were unprepared...
..but that's not the solution. I think he's wrong.
It's the Vietnam trap all over again...send more troops. I vote no.
I'm sick of his Hawkish statements.
He's had his moments of spouting reasonable sound bites but mostly he disappoints me.
I don't want him as our nominee in 2008, but he does.
It's just politics to him.

I do agree that the number of Iraqis prepared to take over is WAY too low.
Not only were we unprepared, we appear to be incompetent.

No more troops to Iraq, Mr. Biden.

1,853
http://icasualties.org/oif
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. When Nixon wrenched our troops out of Viet Nam,
we left many, many Vietnamese behind. They were placed in prison camps for re-education, abused. Who knows how many died? We do know that many were so desperate that they boarded flimsy boats, risking their lives to get away from the fates that awaited them after we left. We have no idea how many Vietnamese drowned or otherwise lost their lives trying to escape.

We can't do that now. We can't leave the Iraqis who have cooperated with us in good faith in the lurch. When we leave, we have to do it in an orderly manner, and we have to ensure that those who have supported us do not face the wrath of the insurgents and their disgusted countrymen alone. Most of them are just ordinary, law-abiding Iraqis who want a better life. They do not deserve to be abandoned to the fanatics who will take over if we just walk away. They are innocent. What do those of you who propose just leaving tomorrow plan to do about good people (not talking about crooked Iraqis on the take, of which I presume there are a few if not many) who innocently bought into Bush's promises of a better life?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. I'm not sure I was clear enough
I didn't mean to imply that Biden (and McCain) was right, without equivocation. I meant that he was right in a way. And that "way" is simple -- we (Bush) not only did a Bad Thing, but did it badly.

If we don't leave Iraq, we guarantee more death, from the meat-grinder violence. If we DO leave Iraq, we guarantee more death, from the backlash against Iraqis perceived to have been in the employ of the USA.

Bush never learned the first Rule Of War: There is no way to win. You simply get several choices about how to lose. You pick the least-bad choice and you try to pretend it's going to be okay. Which also means that you don't do it on a whim or for emotional satisfaction.

I wasn't praising Biden's alleged wisdom (I don't think he has any). I just think Biden knows how badly Bush has screwed over Iraq, America, and every third party to this clusterfuck.

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glaucon Donating Member (116 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. Someone tell Biden and McCain

THE WAR IS OVER!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Amerika is NOT at War.
There are no Wars. There are two Occupations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. where the f are you going to get them joe?
i dont like you joe...i really dont.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. AAAARRRRRGGGGHHHHH!!!!!
@#!>&%@! :grr: DAMNIT!!!! :argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
12. Fewer than 3,000 trained Iraqi troops?
I swore I heard Condi Rice talking numbers around 120,000 a few months back. Boy, I'm really confused. Someone is lying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocracyInaction Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
13. We could have sent 10 million troops in from the get go and
we still would be getting the living shit blown out of us. It makes no difference if we leave a half hour from now or 40 years from now. Once we board the bus, every ugly, greedy, power hungry bastard this side of hell is going to start a civil war. In the end, it will become as it was in the beginning: someone who makes Sadaam look like Jesus but with the backing of the US government. We will pay him to slit the Iraqi's throats and pump his oil our way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC