Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Murray Waas reports more on Rove/Plame....Ashcroft involvement

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
AnnInLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 08:00 PM
Original message
Murray Waas reports more on Rove/Plame....Ashcroft involvement
This article came out yesterday, so it may have been reported here...if this is a dupe, please excuse!

http://villagevoice.com/news/0533,waasweb1,66861,2.html

What Now, Karl?
Rove and Ashcroft face new allegations in the Valerie Plame affair
by Murray Waas
August 13th, 2005 2:39 PM






Rove consulted on three of Ashcroft’s political campaigns, earning $746,000.

Murray Waas will be writing more about the latest in the Plame affair at www.whateveralready.blogspot.com.
Justice Department officials made the crucial decision in late 2003 to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate the leak of the identity of undercover CIA officer Valerie Plame in large part because investigators had begun to specifically question the veracity of accounts provided to them by White House deputy chief of staff Karl Rove, according to senior law enforcement officials.

Several of the federal investigators were also deeply concerned that then attorney general John Ashcroft was personally briefed regarding the details of at least one FBI interview with Rove, despite Ashcroft's own longstanding personal and political ties to Rove, the Voice has also learned. The same sources said Ashcroft was also told that investigators firmly believed that Rove had withheld important information from them during that FBI interview.

Those concerns by senior career law enforcement officials regarding the propriety of such briefings continuing, as Rove became more central to the investigation, also was instrumental in the naming of special prosecutor Patrick J. Fitzgerald.

Up until that point, the investigation had been conducted by a team of career prosecutors and FBI agents, some of whom believed Ashcroft should recuse himself. Democrats on Capitol Hill were calling for him to step down, but he did not. Then on December 30, 2003, Ashcroft unexpectedly recused himself from further overseeing the matter, and James B. Comey, then deputy attorney general, named Patrick J. Fitzgerald as the special prosecutor who would take over the case.

The Justice Department declined to publicly offer any explanation at the time for either the recusal or the naming of a special prosecutor—an appointment that would ultimately place in potential legal jeopardy senior advisers to the president of the United States, and lead to the jailing of a New York Times reporter.

much more at above link...a must read
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Rove was paid $746,000 by Ashcroft!
Wow - and never a hint as why Ashcroft recused himself.

These people make Watergate seem like child's play.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. Interesting
But it looks like Waas doesn't know Comey picked a career DOJ person named Margolis to supervise Fitzgerald to create a firewall between Fitz snd the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnInLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Thank goodness it was Margolis that Comey appointed
I thought the article implied that Ashcroft was pressured to recuse, and the rest of his staff was "recused by the Justice Dept"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. possibly why Ashcroft later resigned?
facinating story, I can't wait to see what happens next.

thanks for posting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. Kicked and bookmarked.
Looks like a good read!

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Independent_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. Kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. I will be glad when we finally hear from the Grand Jury on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
8. I believe Tenet had something very big on Ashcroft
which made him recuse himself and run scared and lets not forget his physical pancreatitis episode!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. That's one hell of an interesting notion.
Can you supply any details or hints?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. have to do with a certain plane crash? just wondering... Tenet would know
where lots of skelatons are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Aha. You speak of Carnahan of course.
When Ashcroft lost a Senate race against a dead man.

They got the timing down a little better in 2002, when Wellstone crashed with just enough time to be taken off the ballot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
9. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
10. This is a good one!!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
11. I thought he recused himself due to a pancreaitis difficulties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Halliburton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. yeah i guess the justice dept. coup
caused those pancreatic difficulties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. It was "pantsarereallytightinmyass", that is, another way of saying
his knickers were in a knot.

LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Al-CIAda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
16. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
18. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Al-CIAda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
19. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Al-CIAda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
20. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC