Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Administration - Attack Subs called off of Afghanistan patrol.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 12:16 PM
Original message
Bush Administration - Attack Subs called off of Afghanistan patrol.
Edited on Tue Aug-16-05 12:47 PM by redqueen
I've seen two Washington Post articles cited for this claim, but both only seem to refer to Clinton's order to have those two subs sit there waiting for a chance to take Osama out.

Anyone have a link referring to to the order from Bush?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. since when does
Afghanistan have a coast?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Afghanistan is landlocked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yeah ok nitpickers...
Off the closest coast to Afghanistan.

Can I get some relevant replies, maybe? Or would anyone else like to nitpick and not offer anything worthwhile?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Don't get your panties in a bunch.
Nitpick?

If you want some "relevant replies", you might want to start with a geographically correct OP. Kinda destroys any credibility you might think you have on the subject.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Don't get insulting.
If I was asserting that I had any "credibility" (eyeroll here), would I be asking the question here?

The fact is (obviously) that I don't know of the original cite for the claim, and am having trouble finding it. I'd like to know if it's bogus or not... so whatever you're trying to say about my "credibility" kinda fades into meaninglessness there, doesn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC