Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who do freepers blame for high gas prices? n/t

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 12:38 PM
Original message
Who do freepers blame for high gas prices? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Clinton, of course n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 12:40 PM
Original message
I read on the DU yesterday that it was Gore's fault
I know everything defaults to Clinton, and by proxy Gore would then be Clinton's responsibility, so Ding, Ding Ding, correct answer!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. beat me to it!!! Every malady of the planet, the species and the
civilization; past, present and future will be laid on Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. if not Clinton then they will use the Freedom isn't Free crap
I have heard that one mentioned a few times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
24. clinton's penis
drilled where it shouldn't have
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. The Clenis
All bad = Clenis' fault

All goo = Dear Leader's doing.

Get it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. Godless, evil liberals.
Edited on Tue Aug-16-05 12:40 PM by BlueEyedSon
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. A Republican friend pointed out that gas prices are not high in context
If you consider the effects of inflation we still haven't reached the levels we were paying during the 1974 energy crisis.

I asked how high they'd have to go before he gave up his Lincoln Town Car. He said he'd start thinking about it when gasoline hits $5.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. 12 months
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. I heard on Nationalism Propoganda Radio (NPR) today
that we have finally broken the absolute inflation threshold and have crossed into unchartered territory - the highest real gas prices ever.

But, of course, your friend aching to pay 5$ per gallon wouldn't accept that type of accounting since it comes from the liberal controlled NPR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. Here's right in a sense...
At it's worst, in 2005 dollars, oil was at $86/barrel in the 1970s gas crisis.
Of course, that doesn't consider several facts. First, a lot more people commute these days, and their trip is generally longer than it was then.
Also, wages have been almost completely stagnant over the past 30 years, while inflation has continued at the usual rate. So even though it was $86/barrel in the 1970s in 2005 dollars, that still doesn't accurately reflect the consumer's ability to pay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rogue_bandit Donating Member (105 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
20. When will they peak:?
I got an opportunity to ask Senator Wyden (D-Oregon) if he had any idea when the prices would peak. Essentially he said he didn't have a clue. Made me wonder just how much anyone in Washington knows about anything. You'd think a Senator would have a clue.

He also pointed out that gas prices are not high in context. My problem is that people are living further away from work, and that prices are climbing quickly. Poor people are hit most hard. $5.00 a month to a poor person is a totally different amount than it is to someone making $50,000 a year (let alone $1,000 a day).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. In Context To What? A Senators Salary?
If this is one of the good guys, you really have to wonder if there is any hope.

While I am all for higher prices finally forcing a transition to renewables, we have to find a way to buffer the impact of the economic Darwinism that will take place as demand destruction accelerates.

Rationing seems to be the only way to accomplish this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #27
35. rationing might be the only way
People won't get out of their Hummer by themselves it appears. Maybe the mere mention of rationing by mainstream people will settle this down a bit. I hope fall will settle gas prices down anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
21. Your friend needs to remember that gas prices inflate everything.
Filling the tank is maybe the least of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
25. This is the standard reply. "It's still low"
rw idiots are getting kicked in the balls everyday by bush, and they love it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #25
37. It's the standard lessaiz-faire economic line
Prices are relative to everything else in the economy. At least in theory, when the price of a commodity gets too high, eventually enough people will change their behavior en masse and do something about it.

The problem IMO with that line of thought is that the economics of petroleum are far from a free and open market. The deck is stacked solidly in favor of Big Oil, who manage to profit from every fluctuation up or down regardless of what it really costs us (including human lives) to get the goo out of the ground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. "and do something about it" - They do, they raise the prices of everything
Edited on Tue Aug-16-05 01:31 PM by The_Casual_Observer
else to compensate. I'll bet we are in for a bout of hyperinflation in consumer goods similar to what we have already seen with the housing bubble. While at the same time the housing bubble will burst because of rising interest rates required to "cool inflation".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. I'm thinking more like "THEY will do something about it"
As opposed to I or WE will do something about it.

Other people will start riding bicycles.

Other people will turn down their thermostats.

Other people will get by on lower quality food.

...I'll bet we are in for a bout of hyperinflation in consumer goods similar to what we have already seen with the housing bubble. While at the same time the housing bubble will burst because of rising interest rates required to "cool inflation".

It's a given that no matter how things pan out the banks and financiers will profit from it. That's what distinguishes an ugly Capitalist from a true free market advocate, and it's why we have to regulate some types of business activity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noahmijo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. environmentalists
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. Environmentalists and Muslims, of course
And the Clintons. Anything deeply evil or even slightly annoying can always be attributed to the Clintons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
9. Liberals!
Most likely, Cindy Sheehan.

Refinery problems, Iran, and unrest in Venezuela seem to be their prime suspects.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
10. Clinton, liberals, environmentalists, Satan, the boogieman, Michael Moore
They are not going to take any responsibility for their actions - you can count on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
13. Communists, probably.
It cracks me up how older Freepers continue to blame everything on Communists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Yeah, that's funny stuff...
They also refer to all Democrats as "socialists." Truly bizarre.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ediacara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
14. Clinton, maybe Chavez too, and maybe the Sunnis in Iraq
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
16. Clenis, Hillary and Albright.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
17. It's a by-product of the Clinton years, naturally,
Edited on Tue Aug-16-05 12:47 PM by elperromagico
just like the 90s boom was a by-product of Reagan's economic policies.

Let me key you in to the Republican Truth: Clinton didn't produce economic growth. He just happened to get elected right before economic growth occurred.

By the same token, Bush has produced economic growth. That growth just won't evidence itself until a Democrat has taken office.

It's God's way of keeping Bush humble.

This "black is white, up is down" moment brought to you by elperromagico. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Ohioan Donating Member (53 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
19. Different Gasoline Derivatives
What I have heard is that there is a lack of refining capacity. Different regions and states have different requirements for their grades of gasoline. If everyone used a collective few of the better grades (California's gasoline grades come to mind), then the overall cost to produce gasoline would drop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #19
29. I think a refinery blows up every week.
Yes, that's part of it. It's easy to tell who has the most gas requirements(california) just by price. Maybe we should try to get more uniformity in that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #19
32. That is part of it.
First, they state what Liberal Ohioan (welcome to DU!) wrote, then blame all of that on tree huggers, enviromentalists, liberals and NIMBYs.

They refuse to acknowledge the record profits of oil companies by either refuting the reports (Liberal Media) or, often when presented with links to the articles on profits they run away or change the subject.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Touchdown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #19
34. Ask them this.
How does a lack of refineries affect the price of a barrel of crude? We don't have $60 a barrel because of lack of refining capacity. It's a red herring, and always was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
22. HERE:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #22
30. I completely agree
There are serious fundamental problems, I don't doubt that for a second, but speculators are blowing this all out of proportion. I hope those assholes are enjoying our hard earned money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
23. One yesterday told me Exxon executives and other CEOs
were making huge profits and he was pissed about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack The Tab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
26. The stretches of imagination and leaps of logic are more pathetic...
in the last 6 months. I visit there at least once a week to see how the hard right looks at the news. In the past 6 months I have seen such outright delusion and paranoia, WAY more than you can usually find there.

It has been truly mind-boggling this past few weeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
28. Democrats for blocking the Engergy Bill, even though they're the minority
It's all our fault; accept it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. Thank God it finally passed
and gas prices are tumbling! maybe it takes 8 years to kick in like the bush tax cuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
31. Clinton has no energy plan!
In '97(?), it was all the rage for the hip, young brownshirt to scream "Clinton has no energy plan! Clinton has no energy plan. This was during the rolling blackouts in CA and all fingers pointed towards the whitehouse...

I actually tried this on a frepper pal of mine app. a month ago at a BBQ. "Whaddya think about the gas prices?" asked the freeper pal who delighted in parroting Rush. "Bush has no energy plan! Bush has no energy plan!" I replied. The vein around his left temple did a jig akin to Hitler's in Paris.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
36. Clinton or Carter?? (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
38. Clinton and the devil, who else
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC