Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Another huge blast in Baghdad - 43 killed - 70 wounded

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
leftylady Donating Member (281 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 09:12 AM
Original message
Another huge blast in Baghdad - 43 killed - 70 wounded
Three bombs at a bus station.

The big problem is: if we left it would probably get worse

If we stay it will probably get worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. Any word on how many casualties of what kind?
Innoncent civilians vs. bona fide military targets?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Thanks, I think
"The majority of victims appeared to be civilians..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. I think you're right - it's going to get worse
Does anyone have any idea of any good option we have in this mess?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftylady Donating Member (281 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. We could make Iraq a state of the union
Kind of like Peurto Rico
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheepyMcSheepster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
5. who would have imagined this invasion/occupation would ended up like this?
i mean who would have thought that this would have turned into the clusterf*ck that it has? it's not like anyone thought this was originally a bad idea...........i guess you live and learn........
:sarcasm:

my opinion from the get go has been:

a. the people running this thing are completely incompetent

OR

b. the people running this thing do not desire peace in Iraq
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. a and b are NOT mutually exclusive, btw.
I think its both:

the completely incompetent people running this thing do not desire peace in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burried News Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. I agree - completely.
The last thing they want is peace and security in Iraq. They want to titrate it to lower levels to be sure - unfortunately the other side isn't cooperating. These casualties are enormous - I really feel for the average Iraqi. Their oil is a curse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jzodda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
6. no easy answers
leave and it degenerates to utter chaos

stay and we keep bleeding

there is only so much we can do though. In the end those people have to want to live with each other. We can not make them get along and frankly it might not be possible. Shia vs Sunni has been going on for more time then the US has existed as a nation. Since the creation of Iraq in the 1920s the monarchy and then the baathists have exploited the divisions to the max-thats how politics is done arab style.

I say let them get their constitution, help them with their Dec elections then withdraw all the troops except the ones needed to train the Iraqi's and help rebuild the country. Maybe once they realize they have to fight for themselves the gov there will become much improved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Doesn't seem to matter either way
Presence or no presence there is chaos and death.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
7. mike_c's corollary to the pottery barn rule....
We broke it, but it can't be fixed, so no matter what we do to try to make amends, it will simply remain shattered.

The best thing we can do is get out now. Immediate, complete withdrawal, followed by war crimes prosecutions for those responsible for all those deaths and the subsequent upheaval as Iraq comes apart. Saddam and the ba'athists were the glue that held Iraq together. We have destoyed a nation, and it's people are going to suffer because of it. The only way to prevent it is to be worse than Saddam ever was, which is what we're doing now.

The U.S. military has killed more Iraqis than Saddam did. The "rape rooms" and torture chambers are simply under new management. The occupation of Iraq is destroying everything that America stands for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kansasblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
10. Is the Tet?
Edited on Wed Aug-17-05 09:31 AM by kansasblue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
13. Someone on The News Hour last night was saying they were expecting
something really big, like a lot of huge bombs, especially in Baghdad, sometime soon. They said things typically settle down for a short while, then they have massive attacks. He was only a day ahead of schedule in his prediction. The Administration needs to be talking to him for his insight to help save our troops lives and Iraqi lives, but I can't remember who he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burried News Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
14. The last refuge of the scoundrels needs to be refuted.
Edited on Wed Aug-17-05 10:52 AM by Burried News
Is the world better off without Saddam? No. Even I could never believe I could come to that conclusion. I have. This war is over, kaput, fini.


If you don't think so today you will tomorrow. How many years of this horrible bloodshed have to pass befor it will be self evident to the majority of Americans? One more - 2006.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC