Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A word about "False Flag Attack" predictions...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 09:22 AM
Original message
A word about "False Flag Attack" predictions...
9/11 was a bolt from the blue. Aside from intelligence community insiders with "hair on fire" warnings of imminent attacks, the vast majority of Americans were completely non plussed by the attacks. One of the many benefits of such a surprise is that it makes premeditation by anyone look ridiculous - something a false flag attacker needs.

The next attack will not be a surprise. Indeed Cheney, Rumsfeld et. al. have already been promising us "not if, but when". We now have a strange phenomena: the shameless lies about Iraq and the questions surrounding 9/11 have a sizable number of us suspecting that the next attack will come either under the supervision or approval of this administration. Imagine that! That has to be unprecedented.

So...what can they do to discredit these suspicions? How about spread a bunch of false rumors and make sure that we've cried wolf so many times that any claim that "we predicted this attack" seems ridiculous.

So, yeah, an attack is probably coming. And, yeah, I’ll be suspicious as to who’s behind it when it comes. But predict a date? That’s a game for suckers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Merlot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. Every night on the local news
there's another story about a suspected terrorist attcak being discovered.

I hear the drum beat, I know it's getting louder.

"see, there were so many that we caught, but we couldln't catch them ALL."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. WorldNetDaily: "Aug 6: Nuke terror to strike U.S. by this weekend?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. time is getting close.... Iranian Oil market to opne March '06
my money says thaey don't let it happen since it trades in euro's

something will happen to make iran look bad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. I'd be surprised if we don't see something on the Iranian front...
by March '06.

And, yeah, if by March '06 nothing happens, you can remind me. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
4. Richard Clarke has been saying "not if, but when" as well.
Great article in the Atlantic Monthly earlier this year.

Is he part of the conspiracy as well?!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Richard Clarke also said that the Saudis that were flown out...
Edited on Wed Aug-17-05 11:03 AM by Junkdrawer
shortly after 9/11 were fully vetted.

Some think "Richard Clarke" and "limited hangout" are closely related terms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC