Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Because of Citizens' Loss, All Property Owners Facing Increase

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
steve2470 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 01:29 PM
Original message
Because of Citizens' Loss, All Property Owners Facing Increase
http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGBQ3QUVHCE.html

Watch out my fellow Floridians !

ORLANDO, Fla. (AP) - Florida homeowners will pay an average 7 percent surcharge on their property insurance as the state's insurer of last resort moved Wednesday to recover its losses from last year's hurricanes by charging private insurers $516 million.

Citizens Property Insurance, created by the state in 2002 for homeowners who couldn't find insurers to underwrite high-risk properties, is imposing the one-time charge through its legal authority to spread out its losses across all companies. Private insurers, in turn, are allowed to directly pass that charge on to consumers, meaning someone with a $5,000 insurance bill will have to pay an extra $340.

Citizens board chairman Bruce Douglas said that insurer had no choice because under state law it must impose the surcharge to recoup its losses.

Citizens, with 740,000 customers, is the state's second-largest insurer behind State Farm, but legally must charge the highest rates so it doesn't with private companies. Besides spreading out losses by billing insurance companies, the quasi-government entity is able to issue bonds to raise money.

<snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
short bus president Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. wha?
"created by the state in 2002 for homeowners who couldn't find insurers to underwrite high-risk properties" - what business does the state have making it possible for people to construct EXPECTED hurricane fodder? How is something like that even possible? What is the state's interest in having repeat disaster areas be repeat REALLY COSTLY disaster areas?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HadItUpToHere Donating Member (204 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. is that "angry arnie" in your avatar?
wallace shawn rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Southpaw Bookworm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. One answer
To your first question: Earning political contributions from their rich cronies who build in shore areas?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. I agree with you, it doesn't make any sense.
Isn't this what federal flood insurance does?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. of course, you realize what generally constitutes 'high risk' property in
Florida, no?


Coastal Properties, a.k.a. those multi million dollar mansions you will see but probably never have a shot at owning.

That's who this covered for the most part, I'll bet. :grr:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. John Stossel did an episode one time
about flood insurance. He had owned a beachfront house (a big one, needless to say). A storm wiped it out and the insurance reimbursed him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HadItUpToHere Donating Member (204 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. It couldn't happen to a nicer state, IMHO.
florida gets what florida deserves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlaGranny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. With everyone's anger toward
the rich folks building mansions on the ocean, you all seem to be forgetting us retired folks who can only afford to live in mobile homes. We are the ones facing this crisis - not those rich folks on the ocean. Their homes didn't sustain much damage last year. I have my home insured for $25,000 at a yearly rate of $1200 through the state's insurance. It was either $1200 a year or take the chance of losing everything. There are hundreds of thousands of others in the same boat. Many are now uninsured. I have no idea how long I'll be able to keep paying that much money for so little coverage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC