Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

N.J. Eatery Writes 'Jew Couple' on Check

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 06:56 PM
Original message
N.J. Eatery Writes 'Jew Couple' on Check
There was an incident like this last year in South Carolina where the server wrote "Nasty Nigger" on a man's receipt.

http://www.breitbart.com/news/2005/08/17/D8C1R9882.html

The bill was a shocker, and not because of the amount. After eating at a Jersey shore restaurant, Elliott Stein and his girlfriend were handed a bill that said "Jew Couple" near the bottom, as a table identifier used by the waitstaff. The slur also turned up on Stein's credit card statement weeks later.

"My grandfather went through all that in old-school Europe," Stein, a New Yorker and a regular at the restaurant, told the New York Post. "But that happened more than 50 years ago. You don't expect it to happen in 2005."

The New Jersey Attorney General's Office said Wednesday it is investigating the July incident at Parkhill's Waterfront Grill through its Division on Civil Rights.

cut

The server, identified on the check only as Karina, is no longer working at the restaurant, general manager Malia Wells said Wednesday. Wells wouldn't say if it was because of the incident.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
despairing optimist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is Hal Turner waiting tables on the Jersey shore nowadays?
He must have fallen on hard times. See www.halturnershow.com if you can stand it. He's a New Jerseyan, and I'm quite sure in a very tiny minority among his fellow residents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theshadow Donating Member (618 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
29. My God, he is one nasty man.
How proud the local GOP must be to have him so active in their organization.

I checked the message boards..... pure Nazi stuff. Even the crash of the airliner in Greece was (to them) a sign of the mongrelization of the races, yada yada yada.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
despairing optimist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. I haven't checked out Hal's board recently
Edited on Wed Aug-17-05 09:18 PM by despairing optimist
I get angry enough reading the news articles here without the help of Hal's, um, unique slant on the news. But he's still out there, diminished but present. Maybe my guess about the waitperson isn't too far off the mark.

Hal has a young son too. Poor kid. Screwing up a kid's mind is the worst way to abuse him, I think. He'll carry those scars for life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mairead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. What exactly is being objected to?
The phrasing? Something else? If she'd written 'Jewish couple' would that have been okay? I don't get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Are you serious?

How about if it was two gay people, and they wrote "Queers" on it? Hey, they're only being descriptive, right?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mairead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
21. Yes, I'm serious. Are you claiming that the problem is in the wording?
Would it have been okay if it had been "Jewish couple"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. You mean like saying "fag couple" or "chink couple"
Your either being disingenuous or your ignorant of history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #27
64. I don't get it, either and my fiance is half Jewish and half Swedish
dear.

Really. It was impolite as hell, but it wasn't a slur.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mairead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:17 AM
Response to Reply #27
74. Have you really thought about this?
Because you seem to be saying that "Jew" is a slur.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #74
78. You just don't get it.
This Jewish couple was offended by the use of "jew couple". That should be good enough for you. "Nigger" comes from the word negro,that should tell you something. You wouldn't be asking this question if that was one a black couples bill,or would you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mairead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #78
86. I don't think that it is I who doesn't get it
If I were the only White woman seated in a restaurant, it would not surprise or annoy me to see 'White woman' or some abbreviation therefor. Why should it? I might feel a little needled if it read 'old White woman' since at 65 I consider myself merely middle-aged, but what on earth would the payoff be for me to assume ageist malice? What could I get out of it? Answer me that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #86
91. THEY were offended by it.
Isn't that reason enough? Do you understand that? When someone offends women on DU and the offender doesn't think he is being offensive,does that stop it from being so? You know bitch is a female dog,why can't the waiter put that on your bill?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mairead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #91
104. People can 'be offended' by mistake. By misinterpreting.
Or they can 'be offended' by always thinking the worst. Or when they're the ones who are offensive. Someone who feels offended is not ipso facto a respectable victim of offence.

I've explained my position as well as I can. Sorry that it hasn't been good enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thtwudbeme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #74
108. "Jew Couple" is about as nasty as "Jew Boy"
This isn't that difficult is it?

Also that sort of labelling probably isn't need as "Table 24" would suffice. Ie. without the cultural labels.


But then again what do I know as I'm a mutt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #21
41. We used to do something like this all the time at the restaurant
When I was at the front door we'd write descriptions next to the names on the waiting list. We'd write "2♀" then we'd add "blue coat" or something descriptive. We never wrote "slut whore", though, for some reason. Oh yeah, because it would be WRONG.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ernstbass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #41
80. I wrote little reminders when I was a waitress
I usually used initials to describe the table - never any racial or religios slurs but I remember writing F.P. for fat people once.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #80
83. I waited tables for 10 years and always used the table number. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #21
66. Probably not as bad, in my opinion
but anyone in any kind of service related job, dealing with the public, really ought to know better. It sounds like a slur to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #21
67. I still cannot believe that you're serious. What don't you get about
how offensive this is. Jewish couple, black couple, fag couple...identifying customers on a bill by perceived racial/ethnic identity is heinous. Personally it sounds to me like it was deliberately meant to be offensive. Think about it.

BTW... I will never ever forget the time, I was about 15 years old and someone came up to me and called me a kike. It was shattering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fudge stripe cookays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #21
93. How about the old standbys....
Edited on Thu Aug-18-05 02:54 PM by fudge stripe cookays
like assigning NUMBERS to tables, or even saying "table by the window."

Calling you an idiot would be rude, so... :eyes:

FSC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #21
96. Of course it wouldn't be okay! Jeebus...
The problem is that some dimwit focused on the couple's ethnic background to identify them.

That's bigoted and extremely fucked up!:thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boomer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. Help me out on this one
I'm not being facetious when I wonder if this was meant to be descriptive rather than insulting.

Is it the use of the word "Jew"? Would "Jewish" have made it okay? Or was it the fact that they were tagged by their religion as opposed to something like hair color or clothing? Would "yuppie couple" or "mousy couple" have been better?

Putting myself in the same position, if I'd noticed that my bill had "gay couple" scrawled somewhere, I wouldn't see it as an insult. When I'm out with my partner, we're pretty obviously gay. If the bill had said "lesbian couple," same reaction. If it had said "queers", then I'd be pretty steamed.

So is the word "Jew" in and of itself a slur? It certainly can be used as an insult, but usually that interpretation is defined by context and by who uses it, with what intention. When I lived in New York, many people used "Jew" in a matter-of-fact way: I'm a Jew.

There is no context with a scrawled note from a waitress that's quickly ID'ing her tables. Maybe she did mean it as a slur, or maybe it just was a description. How much of this insult is real and how much is assumed?

Damned if I know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. "Jew", in and of itself, is not an insult.
However, in context, it certainly can be.

I think the phrasing- to describe them as "Jew Couple", is insulting and offensive. "Jewish Couple" might have been better, but really, isn't this why most restaurants have table NUMBERS for their waitstaff?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
49. Probably is why they
they numbers for their tables so hurried wait staff don't take all these short cuts in describing who gets what bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jzodda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. It depends on the context..In this case its a slur
and you should be insulted if somebody puts "gay couple" on your receipt also.

Whats the purpose of trying to identify or classify people? Whats the difference between a "jew couple" and any other couple in the restaurant? and how do they know they are Jews without asking?

When I read that it was not how they worded the check that bothered me, but the fact that they worded it at all

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boomer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Point taken
Edited on Wed Aug-17-05 07:32 PM by Boomer
My partner definitely found the term insulting, so I'm probably giving the waitress too much credit on this one.

This kind of judgment call seems to be a constant balancing act in my life -- how much offense do I take at offending statments? At what point does "no offense meant" cease to have any legitimacy because the offense was very much felt?

It gets old after awhile, so perhaps my tendency is to try to rationalize it away so I won't have to fire up my adrenal gland yet again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mairead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
23. " how do they know they are Jews without asking?"
he was wearing a kipeleh maybe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #23
48. That's what I'd like to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #23
57. I"ve frequently been mistaken for Jewish, even by Jews.
So, using that as a descriptor would be wrong, as well as inaccurate.

Or, a couple might even be semitic in appearance, but be muslim. If THEY recieved such a bill, would the descriptor of "Jew couple" be acceptable?

why even use such a descriptor? to keep the tables straight? sheesh.

I suppose if I came to the table, it would be "fat guy with beard". Should I be ok with that descriptor?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #23
100. Kipeleh?(sp) An affectionate term for head. Do you mean yarmulke?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patcox2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
97. Russian immigrant waittress with poor english?
Thats what it was, you know. Don't be so sure of her intent that it be a slur.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patcox2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #97
98. Russian immigrant waitress with poor english skills.
And different social background and mores. We have an enormous number of russian and eastern european seasonal workers in New Jersey who come just for the summer and work service jobs. Most have just enough english (but their russian accents are actually very cool) to get by. Her name was Karina, and I bet you thats her situation.

Their culture, it seems from talking to them, is a bit "Archie-Bunkerish," they can seem insensitive about a lot of things, very very straightforward, they do not use euphemisms for anything.

So this non-native english speaker from a completely different culture committed a faux pas.

Lets all just condemn the employer and assume everyone in the room was an anti-semite, thats the smart thing to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yankeedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. The problem here is
Why did they assume that they were Jews? Maybe? I'm not sure either. I think it might be something that wasn't intended to be a slur, but came out that way. Someone needs some sensitivity training at the Shore I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ismnotwasm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Possibly it was not meant to be a slur
But their are far better ways to ID tables. Like "table 4" for instance. Why ethnicity or sexual orientation or the like needs to be brought up on a bill is suspicious for insult. My experience with restaurant work is that tables and sections already have identifiers. So while intent can't be accurately judged by the infomation given, that type of identifier on the bill is in poor judgement to say the least, not to mention poor taste.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. You have got to be fucking kidding me
There is no fucking way in any reality that writing "Jew Couple" on a resturant check is not a slur. How about Nigger couple, or Disgusting Fat couple, or even worse Anti-American Liberal couple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ismnotwasm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #16
24. Just giving the benefit of the doubt in answer to a question
'Cause I know some extremely ignorant folks who honestly don't understand. Thick as bricks. I agree it was a smear, but the poster asked a question and I was just trying to answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #24
61. Oh... sorry... this issue just bugs me
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donailin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #16
46. Or Italian Couple, Or Hungarian couple, or Asian couple
why is there always such a quick leap to anti-semitism when the word Jew is used by someone who is not Jewish? Do Jews not call themselves Jews? Is there some rule that says no one can use the term Jew to describe a Jew?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TimeChaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #46
51. Because the word Jew is not an adj
If they had said "Jewish couple" it wouldn't have been so bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #51
79. Funny - many of my pseudo in laws call themselves Jews
I don't know what happened in this instance but I do know the word Jew is not necessarily as charged as you may think it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hexola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #79
88. ...which is a plural noun...hence ok...
Words mean things...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #88
89. Yes but people use improper language all the time.
In this cae it may have been a slur. Or it may have been nothing more than poor language skills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susanna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #46
52. This is not an anti-Semitic thing...
What I maintain is that ethnicity, race, gender, etc., have no place in giving good service to restaurant customers. Period. I wouldn't write Asian or Hungarian on a ticket, either.

This is just very, very poor judgment as regards the server in question. Seriously; she really wasn't thinking. Many, many customers check their tickets carefully for errors; they follow up in checking their credit card statements. The obvious offense in this story that I can tell is that the "descriptive phrase" appeared on BOTH: the ticket and the credit card statement. Now that's not right, no way, no how...I don't care how you spin it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeBlueInRhody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #16
69. While I do think it was inappropriate.....
....to use the word Jew it is not always a slur. To single one out as a "nigger" or "disgusting and fat" always is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susanna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #10
38. Former waitress here, too...
I can recall barking out or writing "Table 6" hundreds of times. I never once said, or wrote, "Table 6, the Jew/Black/White/Gay/Straight couple." Hopefully that illustrates the case better for those who might think this behavior is okay. It isn't.

Table 1, Table 2, etc., assist servers in making their service neutral. That is really the idea in service; you serve the poorest customer, as well as the richest, with the same care. That was always my motto.

I actually got canned from one service gig because I refused to let some VIP grab my ass. Repeatedly. Yes, this happened, and not in the 50s. It was in the late 80s. I told my manager if he liked the people at the table so much, he should wait on them and let them grab his ass. I was asked to leave for not being a team player. I was happy to go. :-)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donailin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
28. "Jew" is not always meant as a religion identifier, but an ethnic/national
one. I had two Jewish teen girls here last week, both from Israel. Both also self proclaimed "not religious"

I think there is way too much paranoia. What if the waiter added the "ish". . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susanna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #28
40. ...and as a server,
I would never have written "Caucasian couple" or "African-American couple" on my tickets, either.

This person was just plain wrong. Customer descriptions are NOT a standard method for good service.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donailin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #40
45. I waitressed for years and years too
I come from a restaurant family. I see no real evidence of prejudice, all the fact are not in. And as i said downthread, assuming there are no table identifiers, and the waiter is in the weeds, and if there were multi ethnic customers such as the couple from Italy, or the couple from GB and they were labeled "Brit Couple, Italian Couple" then no one would even comment.

So this person cannot be judged right or wrong until the facts are in. And describing a customer on the ticket has nothing to do with how one serves if it simply is a mental note for the waiter himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susanna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. Even understanding being in the weeds...
Edited on Wed Aug-17-05 10:52 PM by susanna
I would have NEVER thought to use a descriptive term. I have been in weeds taller than I'd like to recount; having an entire diner I was serving sat AT ONE TIME (15 tables). I still used table numbers to identify my clientele, no matter what. I guess we can agree to disagree w/ what's right or wrong here.

On edit: re-reading your earlier post, I find it amazing that there would be a restaurant today without table numbers. If you have been in those types of restaurants, I maintain I would certainly have figured out my own method of identifying the table, and not based on the customer's ethnicity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpaceCatMeetsMars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #40
82. When I waited tables, I was taught that it was rude to
even call the customers a man or a woman. Say the busboy brought over their drinks for you, you would say, "The gentleman ordered the martini and the lady is having the gin and tonic."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psyop Samurai Donating Member (873 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
33. "Jew" is not an adjective...
...at least not in the United States, where I've lived for 47 years. The usage is and always has been utterly standard.

"Jew couple" is right up there with "jewess" in my book. I'm not Jewish, but this requires no special knowledge or sensitivity. If what I'm saying is not self-evident, then something's wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hexola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Ahh...good point...bad grammar...now that IS offensive!
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=Jew

Ha - shit! I never knew it was bad to use the word that way...!

I won't do it ever again...

Why have none of my Jewish buddies every said anything about it...?

I guess it's one of those things like "nigger" - its ok to say if you are part of the group that is being slured...

Now if feel dumb...glad I saw this thread...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psyop Samurai Donating Member (873 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #34
39. LOL... perhaps not grammer so much as, um..., "usage"
Hey, thanks for the link...

Usage Note: It is widely recognized that the attributive use of the noun Jew, in phrases such as Jew lawyer or Jew ethics, is both vulgar and highly offensive. In such contexts Jewish is the only acceptable possibility. ...


Perhaps I was a little harsh - I can see how this could have escaped someone - but I've never been aware of this as a "grey zone", nor ever discussed it in any way. It's just something I've always "known", and assumed everyone else did as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raksha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #33
71. "Jewess" is not anti-Semitic per se. , just kind of an archaic usage.
As somebody pointed out, "Jew" is a noun; "Jewish" is an adjective. If someone uses the word "Jew" as an adjective, as in "Jew boy" or "Jew couple," it's not only incorrect grammatically but ALWAYS has insulting connotations. That's just the way it's used. It's like when the freepers call us "Democrat Underground," but even more negative than that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mairead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:45 AM
Response to Reply #71
76. There sure is a lot of prescriptivism being waved around here
Criticising someone as a bigot because they used a particular noun as an adjective is pretty ripe. Like using double negatives or knowing which fork to use for salad, things like that are markers of subculture or class, not politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. Better not see that on one of my Bills
or this "pussy, anti-war, un-American, pacifist, Jew is going to have some serious issues. I'm telling you I'm ready to snap!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. Hey there, wow.
Edited on Wed Aug-17-05 07:33 PM by omega minimo
:wow:

And the TV shows the grief in Gaza.

Hey folks: HOW ABOUT "TABLE #4"!?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
11. The slur also turned up on Stein's credit card statement weeks later? wha
What??? I think this whole story is bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Yeah, that makes sense.
Clearly there would be some glaringly obvious motivation to make a story like that up...

but perhaps you would like to elaborate on your theory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. You know them people make stuff up.
They whine all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #22
58. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #58
60. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #22
68. Actually, I figured it was so they could sue
You know how greedy and money-grubbing they are.

(And yeah, half my family is Jewish. So, yes, I'm being sarcastic)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H5N1 Donating Member (777 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #11
84. now that you mention it, that part sounds damn fishy
I would like to see that statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vektor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
13. Not acceptable to single them out by their ethnicity/religion.
It's just inappropriate. Table number would have sufficed, and if they don't have a numeric system, "red shirt, gray jacket" or something like that would have been ok...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boomer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. I grew up in a working class family...
that always had this pressing need to "tag" people. It wasn't perceived as insulting (which I'm not offering as an excuse), but this cataloging of "the other" seemed to be just second nature for them. The differences were seen, mildly remarked upon, then that was it. Nothing followed the observation that someone was black (or colored), or Jewish, or a Yankee, or fat, or old, or crippled. For some reason it just had to be said.

I've traveled far enough away from my roots that I don't do the same thing myself, but I'm so inured to it that unless I hear the tone that marks "insult definitely intended" the remarks just don't register that strongly. If I got angry every time one of my red-neck Baptist fundamentalist kin said something PI, I would have had a stroke by now.

Not sure if that's a good thing or a bad thing. Sigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mixedview Donating Member (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #25
54. I too grew up in a very diverse, working class area
It is neccessary and normal to acknowledge the differences among us -- but it still has to be done in a context of basic respect, even when the terms used are politically incorrect.

This is not the case here, IMO.

The relationship between a business/employee and it's customers is a professional, formal one which demands a higher level of respect. The server is not this couple's "friend" who can speak to them/refer to them in any way she pleases.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vektor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #25
56. Tee-hee!
I know how you feel - my dear old dad has a tendency to use some pretty antiquated terms to describe people, and though he means no harm, it can get pretty embarrassing at times. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #25
62. "Working class " people often were very "class conscious"
Edited on Thu Aug-18-05 12:01 AM by SoCalDem
and always tried to rank themselves against/with other groups..In order to make themselves a bit better by comparison, the "other" groups were referred to by the vilest stereotypes...and the groups changed as their own status changed..

There used to be signs that said "No Irish need apply"...but the Irish, being Caucasian, could just concentrate on the accent, and drop the O' from their names, and assimilate to a point where they were heading UP the ladder..People THEY passed just picked a different group to look down upon..

Sadly it's in our past, present and probably...future..

The "shorthand" identifiers are rarely favorable..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hexola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #13
32. "Not acceptable" is the best description...We're they Jewish?
Can someone make a case for the word "jew" being a derogative?

Was the couple offended because they were called Jews and arent Jewish?

or

Did they find being singled out based on their faith objectionable in this situation?

It would seem they could complain either way...

The story doesnt really say they are Jewish...I don't want make an assumption based on their last name...wouldn't that be bigoted?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TimeChaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #32
42. The word "Jew" is offensive when used as an adj
And I say that as one who's grown up Jewish. If it had said "Jewish Couple" they probably wouldn't have been insulted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vektor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #32
55. I think it's just that
using their ethnicity to single them out was taken as offensive, versus just using a more neutral factor like what they were wearing, or their table number.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
14. Reminds me of the time I went to a restaurant with my wife
and another couple, friends of ours.

The restaurant was just starting to fill up, and we were the first group to be seated in another section of the restaurant. I'm a big white guy, wife is Asian, other guy was Jewish, wife converted to Judaism when they married.

Anyway, this was a Spanish restaurant. Someone commented that we are all alone in the room. Jewish friend said "Yeah, it's (my wife's) fault, they don't want Asians in the main dining room." I replied with, "How do we know it's not your fault, Jew boy?"

Ah, good times, good times.

BTW, all these comments are in fun, and between friends, so no offense was taken by anyone involved, so no one else should be offended either. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
15. It would be funny if it weren't so outragously bigoted
The waiter must have been a Repuke bigot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
18. I grew up in this general area
And, it definitely could happen. I visit there decently often, and it hasn't changed any. Actually, I'd say there are more Confederate flags around then there were 15-20 years ago...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HadItUpToHere Donating Member (204 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
19. the Chicago Tribune had an article with something similar today-
a woman who had some problems with customer service at Comcast got her bill, the name on the bill said "Bitch Dog" instead of her name...and another guy got his gas bill, and the name on the account had been changed to "scrotum bag"...

http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-0508170154aug17,1,5769158.story?coll=chi-news-hed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #19
50. I know I shouldn't be laughing but I was reading that in the
Trib today and laughing then too. Also the one about the guy who went to the condo basement and cut everyone's cable lines because they tapped into his and then he got satellite. I was crying I was laughing so hard
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheWhoMustBeObeyed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #19
53. Thanks for posting the "Bitch Dog" story
My jaw dropped when I read it earlier today, but I was not surprised to learn the company is Comcast. Comcast took over the old Chicago Cable TV franchise which provided the worst customer service I have ever experienced, and many of those employees were retained after the buy. But still - the temerity of those people who thought they could get away with putting those vulgar terms on customers' statements....unfrickinbelievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
20. Insensitive, tasteless and rude. EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donailin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
26. wait a minute. what if the waiter wrote italian couple as an identifier
or the british couple?

Why is there such a quick assumption of anti-semitism?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #26
37. Jew couple vs. Jewish couple
Setting aside the problematic field ID (did they "look Jewish," or "act Jewish?) there is a difference in "Jew couple" and "Jewish couple." Think "Democrat Party" vs. "Democratic Party" and why some in the right wing have adopted the former. "Jew couple" is only a slightly kinder way of saying Jew as a derogatory term based on my admittedly limited experience in the NY/NJ area.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
30. I am not part of the PC Police...but context is everything...and a little
Common Sense would have worked here as well. "Table #4' as someone described earlier would have been fine, but time and ignorance know no barriers. If this person was wanting for time, had to go to the B/R or just plain frustrated at the whole day seems to have some input here.

once again, Common Sense should have prevailed, but it didn't. it is not so much the offender, but how the offendee takes it that counts. Some things are more descriptive than others; some epithets are hard to defend. I would have erred on the side of caution however, and gone w/"table #4"....:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hexola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
35. Usage note in Dictionary.com
I have to admit - I did not know this...

Usage Note: It is widely recognized that the attributive use of the noun Jew, in phrases such as Jew lawyer or Jew ethics, is both vulgar and highly offensive. In such contexts Jewish is the only acceptable possibility. Some people, however, have become so wary of this construction that they have extended the stigma to any use of Jew as a noun, a practice that carries risks of its own. In a sentence such as There are now several Jews on the council, which is unobjectionable, the substitution of a circumlocution like Jewish people or persons of Jewish background may in itself cause offense for seeming to imply that Jew has a negative connotation when used as a noun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kbm8795 Donating Member (337 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
36. Well look, the whole thing is stupid to begin with. . .
What kind of restaurant doesn't have their wait staff learn a diagramed map of the floor with the tables numbers? When they learn that map, they are able to write the NUMBER on the ticket for the order to remember it. .. not some stupid identification label. Moreover, unless the couple was wearing buttons that said "jew couple" that waitress is sure making insinuations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ernstbass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #36
81. You would be surprised how many restaurants
don't number their tables. I don't understand it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
43. I'm surprised it wasn't "Jew Cuppel"
Ignorant, bigoted sleaze!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mixedview Donating Member (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
44. this is cut and dry - it's hateful whether or not the server meant it
Employees, especially those dealing with the public, have to be sensitive, especially to a historicaly persecuted group.

I hate to say this - but I think there are some even on the left who like to downplay anti-Semitism because they have issues with people like Wolfowitz/neocons and pro-Israel policy.

And for those saying "well, I talk like that around my friends": good for you. Context is everything. Friends joke around with friends and say all types of things - doesn't mean anyone else could.

Political correctness only goes overboard when people are offended for narrow, personal reasons - cases where there was intent to show respect, but there was a misunderstanding or some mistake made.

This is not the case here.

ps. I'm not Jewish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Must_B_Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
59. "Kike couple" would have been offensive
"Jew couple" is just mildly stupid and someone can take offense, but only because they need to feel like they were offended.

On my scale of the offensive, this is nowhere near Jesse Jackson's "Himeytown".

But I mean seriously, do Jews get offended when someone mentions that something gave them the "Heebie Jeebies", I think they should.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
63. Question: how is it a slur to be referred to as a "Jew couple?"
Was it impolite? Yes.

But it wasn't a slur. A slur would be if they called 'em the Heb couple or something.

Look, my husband-to-be is Jewish. I think he's the hottest thing since the sun and the sweetest thing since sugar, but I don't get the slur. I would have just gotten up and asked the people why it was so important that we were the "Jew couple" instead of just, you know, writing down a table number.

Just wondering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hexola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #63
65. see post 35 (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #65
72. OK - but my fiance isn't riled when he's called a Jew
I guess it depends on how one choose to deflect things.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:48 AM
Response to Reply #72
77. He Isn't Riled Because It's Accurate
If your Jewish finance is called a Jew, there's no reason to be offended. If someone says your fiance is a Jewish person, that person is probably uncomfortable with Jews. If someone says your fiance is a Jew lawyer/butcher/baker/candlestick maker, they're being offensive. Jew is a noun. Jewish is an adjective. Jewish baker; my fiance is a Jew.

A couple of Jews; a Jewish couple = correct. Jew couple = inproper use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #77
101. What if a Jew is neither religious nor an adherent to Jewish culture?
Can you call an atheist couple who don't observe Jewish religious rituals, traditions or holidays a Jewish couple? And can they call themselves Jews in their case? Would the word Jews be allright but Jewish inappropriate in the case of atheists? The dictionary definition would indicate that the word "Jewish" applies to someone of the Jewish culture or religion. Can the terms "Semitic" or "of the Hebrew people" be used with respect or do they signify an attempt to classify someone on the basis of stereotypical physical traits, when someone is not a religious Jew?

I'm just asking as now I'm getting a bit confused and would regret insulting someone without realizing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sleipnir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
70. How did the waiter know they were Jewish?
That's what I want to know. Did she just assume or were they openly displaying items that would identify them as Jews?

I think that is the crux of the story. Did she assume the couple was Jewish by the way they looked, acted, etc or did they actually profess openly to be Jews or otherwise display their religion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracyindanger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
73. I hope everyone who doesn't think this is a big deal is Jewish. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:39 AM
Response to Reply #73
75. I'm not Jewish, and even I find it offensive...
Look the word Jew isn't neccessarily offensive in and of itself, when used as an adjective, like "Jew boy/girl", its offensive, or as a verb, like this, "That bastard tried to Jew me!". In this case, Jew=cheat, and is highly offensive. I chewed someone out at work about that, when they accused me of "Jewing them", my cousin married a Jew assholes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracyindanger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #75
94. Exactly. Google 'jew'
They make a good, concise statement about the difference between 'jew' and 'jewish.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
85. Unfortunately bigotry still exists... against anyone or thing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calico1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
87. I think what makes something offensive is
whether or not the person or people in question are offended. Since this couple was offended then to me it doesn't matter if other people think they shouldn't be offended or what should or shouldn't offend them. They were offended and that's what matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mairead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #87
90. I don't think your criterion works as well as you think :-)
I've known plenty bigots who are highly offended at being recognised as bigots. Should I feel bad for them? I don't think so. Why should I have to tolerate the intolerant, or care when the offensive are offended? What's the payoff?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newportdadde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
92. It appeared on his Credit Card statement?
I find that really surprising, it should have just been labled as the place of business then the charge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wideopen Donating Member (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
95. There is some stupid shit being posted here today
Assuming this whole story isn't bullshit, the waitress wrote a note to remind herself what table the check went to. Big. Fucking. Deal. Would it have been offensive if it said "christian couple"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patcox2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
99. A Russian immigrant waittress with poor english,
And different social background and mores. We have an enormous number of russian and eastern european seasonal workers in New Jersey who come just for the summer and work service jobs. Most have just enough english (but their russian accents are actually very cool) to get by. Her name was Karina, and I bet you thats her situation.

Their culture, it seems from talking to them, is a bit "Archie-Bunkerish," they can seem insensitive about a lot of things, very very straightforward, they do not use euphemisms for anything.

So this non-native english speaker from a completely different culture committed a faux pas.

Lets all just condemn the employer and assume everyone in the room was an anti-semite, thats the smart thing to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #99
102. Excuses
Now you are making things up. There was NOTHING in the article about the origins of the waitress. You have spun this into some thing it isn't!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patcox2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #102
107. Enjoy your righteous anger.
Its so liberating to be appalled all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #107
109. Enjoy your rose colored glasses.
Must be liberating not having to deal with the real world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
103. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
jlseagull Donating Member (24 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
105. This is absolutely inane.
I can't believe this is even an issue.

I worked as a waiter once in a steakhouse in a primarily black community. I'm white. For the first three weeks of working there, the faces of all of my customers ran together, and it was quite difficult to get everything to the right person, especially at a table of 8. But when a white guy came in and sat down, bang. New York strip rare with extra coleslaw goes to the white guy. No problem, no hassle. Would I have written it on a reciept? Prolly not, but that's not the point.

Additionally, comparison to Kristallnacht, the Holocaust, and oppression of Jews in general is not only specious and begging the question, but it diminishes the personal hell that time in history represents for my great-uncle, who still has a six digit number on his left arm.

Lastly, no one has a right not to be offended, especially by an overworked waitress who might not speak the language very well. Get a grip. This isn't "The Man" oppressing the little guy, this is the (slight) misapplication of a descriptor that happens to be sensitive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justjones Donating Member (596 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
106. But, but.....I thought we were a colorblind society......
where things like race, religion, national origin, and things of that nature don't matter. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
110. Locking
This thread has run its course, veering at times twixt and dangerously near the whirlpools of Scylla and Charybdis... Time to take this one to safe harbor.

DU Moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC