Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Election 2006 could be set for record levels of fraud

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:02 PM
Original message
Election 2006 could be set for record levels of fraud
Just thinking here, but people all across the spectrum are less and less happy with **. Fitz might go after a number of people surrounding ** due to the Plame investigations. If those investigations REALLY make ** and Cheney look bad, they are not going to want to risk losing the Hill to the Dems in the next election cycle and therefore risk impeachment. My guess is that we are going to see more shocking "upsets" of the Chambliss/Cleland sort.

So the question now, people, is: "What are we gonna do about it?"

Can we head off the election fruad at the pass? (Note: More states have gone over to the Diebold side in recent months. Do we just hope we have enough states where elections still go untampered that we can retake the Hill? Does anyone have an analysis on whether this could be done?) And if not can we prove it fast enough after the election and get enough people on the ground to recognize the vote results have been tampered with to finally hold the junta accountable for first playing with the elections, and then for everything else they have done?

Honestly, folks... what are we going to do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Overwhelming numbers of Democratic voters are what we need.
The election fraud, especially the Diebold sort, only seems to be useful when the election polls (both pre-election and exit polls) are very close. If we could get massive turnout of Democratic voters, independents, Greens and even cross-over Libertarians and unhappy Republicans, then we just might be able to actually win.

We HAVE to win and win big in 2006. It's our last chance and our only hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Diebold can fix the numbers regardless of the voter turnout. They can
say whatever they want to, and they can make it look like it was a close election and therefore voter turnout was almost equal. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I don't think they could overcome the polls if it was like 60%+ Democratic
vs. Republican. It could happen. We'll make it happen! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. it probably already has happened and Diebold erased it anyway n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Exactly. The feeling on the ground on election day was that Kerry
had it in the bag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
43. Of course
Go to pbs.org and watch the documentary "The Architect" and watch the first segment. It's very telling. But is it going to be so easy to do now? Look at all the polls and all the vigils that happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. Tom Feeney provided software to flip election 51%-49% -
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #14
46. And then after the whole debacle..
He said maybe we should go back to literacy tests..

On November 16, 2000 he was quoted in the Palm Beach Post:

"Voter confusion is not a reason for whining or crying or having a revote. It may be a reason to require literacy tests."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H5N1 Donating Member (777 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. That plan is going to fail
They are bold and they will cheat boldly.
We need to get every vote counted or we will lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Agreed. We need to bring back exit polling, too. There was a reason
wny they got rid of it. It showed them for the liars that they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H5N1 Donating Member (777 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. We better start working on this soon, time grows short
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
26. So why is their plan going to fail?? they did it once, second or third
time will be easier, I think most people actually believe; "oh they couldn't steal an election...yhat's the problem and our DEM senators don't do sh*t to change election reform!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. I think what was going to fail was the "get out the vote" answer to theft
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfan454 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
34. How ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melodybe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
27. Demand paper trails with all voting
Edited on Thu Aug-18-05 04:25 PM by Melodybe
sign the petition:
www.verifiedvoting.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. paper trails without audits do us no good. The vote on record is still on
vapor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #27
36. I think we need paper ballots.
I don't believe that a paper trail for a Diebold machine would be worth anything. If paper ballots work in the UK and Canada they'll work for us!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. We initiate a nationwide call-in/write into the DNC.
I really think that is the best organization with which to put the pressure and the focus. We can also do it on a state wide DNC level.

You are absolutely right. We are in trouble if this isn't addressed first and foremost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Has anyone talked to Dr. Dean about this? We really need to know if
he will help lead this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. see post 10 - Dean suggested this during his last visit to Utah
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
10. I'm starting a group that will be off the ground shortly for a
ballot initiative in my state. I suggest everyone does the same in their state. Of course, we'll be voting on this initiative ironically enough on Diebold DREs.

The organization is called U - VOTE which stands for Utah Voters for Open and Transparent Elections

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Excellent! We can't wait for it to come top down, although that
would be great too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
15. We can't leave it to the Dems to combat fraud. It's up to us folks!
We need to get people into County BOEs that are progressive (READ; wants fair and transparent elections). The Dems have shown us their interests lie with the corporations and financial markets. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. okay, what's it take to get into a county BOE?
How do I find out where my county BOE is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #18
28. Does your county have its own website? If not, I would call
your town office and see if they know who you should call.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
16. it doesn't look hopeful
I don't have any useful suggestions unless you have enough money to buy major television networks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. I wish. That's a thought though. What about doing a pod for Current?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. I had a thought about such a thing
Namely, go around asking people on the street about election fraud and record the results. I've had a tough time running into anyone who says the elections weren't rigged, so it may say something interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Well, Greg palast and Michael moore have both covered this
subject to a degree. What is cool about their stuff is they have images from voting boths and scrubbed voting lists and that sort of thing.

Man on the street stuff is great, but it would be cool if we could supplement with other things.

How about we interview Rep. Conyers about "what Went Wrong in Ohio"? (I just put up reprehensor's great post on my site: http://timeforachange.bluelemur.com/Ohio.htm )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
19. Thanks for bringing this up. It might help if we start spreading the
message to republicans that we can hack into the servers and steal elections because

1) There are no paper ballots to back up their votes, so they can't ever "prove" we cheated

2) They're not allowed to inspect the code on the machines, because the companies that own them made them "proprietary business secrets" through some "activist judge"

3) We can even tell them that HILLARY CLINTON has been sleeping with the wife of one of the vote-count-machine company presidents (they are all convinced she's an "evil LESBIAN" :scared: )!

4) Cathy Cox (Democrat) from Georgia has been going around the country meeting with Secretaries of State trying to convince them to buy the computerized voting machines (mostly Diebold) -- and she's running for GOVERNOR of Georgia

5) Cathy Cox's (see above) deputy has also been making hundreds of thousands of dollars pimping for these black box voting machines

6) A lot of the people that have been studying the voting machine security breeches are UNIVERSITY PROFESSORS .... and as the republicans say: "we all know University professors are 100% Democrats". These professors now all know how to hack into the central processors, that can change millions of votes with a few strokes of a keyboard

And, ya know what....FIVE of these 6 things are really true!

So, all we have to do is put out the word to the republicans that WE FULLY INTEND TO DO THIS IN 2006 SO WE CAN SEND ALL THE REPUBLICANS TO JAIL, and see if they don't jump on the "paper ballots and pen markers, hand counted" band wagon.

:applause: Ok. That's my two cents worth!

:kick::kick::kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. It;s about vote safety but also about preventing voter suppression
Voter rolls, and moving polls, and sending out notices to scare people away from voting.

We have to keep an eye out for that sort of thing as well. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. remember too that the Diebold and Sequoia machines are not HAVA compliant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
23. This is a given, because Cindy is changing a lot of minds - Iraq
War is getting worse on a weekly basis - Republicans will look to Diebold to pull off probably the election of our lifetime.

Any one doing minimal research on Ohio election fraud knows Bushco stole Ohio - look how badly Blackwell pulled illegal stunts right in front of our eyes.

Don't understand peoples belief that future elections will be any different, got hand to the repukes...thety got balls!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Plamegate, too, will sour a lot of folks on the Admin. At least the ones
who aren't the sort who adore a certain behavior from their side, but abhor the same behavior from the other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
31. Nothing. Our Leadership will DO NOTHING.
And the 2006 "election" is already over.

The Busheviks won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Are you saying short of taking the streets with picthforks and torches
we can't do a thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #31
37. I would expect Kerry at least be responsible for election reform but
when I heard him say in an iterview that in his opinion; "I believe the bin laden tapes revealed days before the election is what did me in" -

that's when it ocurred to me this guy isn't even going there on Ohio election fraud, it's as though cointless millions were hullucinating this thing, the BS that Blackwell managed to get away with.

These are tough people to beat because they don't have a rule book like Senator Kerry has! (had)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. That was really frustrating to me, too. I had hoped he would really work
Edited on Thu Aug-18-05 05:53 PM by GreenPartyVoter
hard on election reform if not actually call ** out on what happened in OH.

But at least we have John Conyers. Now there is a guy to rally behind on this subject! :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfan454 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
33. Could be ?
The pukes are already laughing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. They laugh all the time. It's what insane and evil people do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
39. Shaddow elections n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Parellel ones?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
41. What can 'we' do?
Define 'we'.

I know, I know .... this sounds like another hopeless post with no answers. It is honestly not intended to be so.

What we NEED is support for fair voting (define that as you see fit) by our elected leadership. Not much has been said other than the brave work of John Conyers and company.

Where's our feckless 04 candidate? The one who rolled on election day +1.

Where's our DNC chair on this?

Where are our unelected Dem leaders? You know .... the ones who participated in the primary debates.

Where are the left leaning organizations? You know .... like moveon dot org.

Even if everyone on DU and similar communities were to get involved every day, how many are we? Couple hundred thousand very annonymous nobodies?

This needs at a **minimum** the amount of media coverage given to Mrs Sheehan, Prosecutor Fitzgerald, Scott Peterson, Paul Hackett, DSM, and The War in Iraq™ combined. Anything less and it stays like it is now ..... largly misunderstood and just another story du jour.

I see media coverage as the real key to getting this solved. Protests might help, but we need people like Boxer and Kennedy and Feingold and Clark and Kucinich and Dean and Clinton and Lautenberg and Kerry and Sharpton and Waters and Conyers and Graham and Edwards and Gore, and .... yes .... Lieberman speaking out long and loud about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. Well, Conyers is already there for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. As pointed out in my second paragraph .....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
42. I think it depends
Edited on Thu Aug-18-05 10:54 PM by FreedomAngel82
on what states they want to get that means something in the 2008 elections. They'll probably do the same one's they always do. These people are desperate to hold their power and will do anything to keep it. They've been waiting thirty years for this and have much more to do before they can lose power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC