Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did the Vietnam War help the cause of Communism...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
kiki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:05 PM
Original message
Did the Vietnam War help the cause of Communism...
...as much as the "war on terror" is helping the cause of international terrorism?

Discuss(ted).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Independent_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah, I kinda agree...
I can see a lot of parralels between this Iraq war and Vietnam. They were fighting against communism in Vietnam. We're supposed to be fighting against terrorism in Iraq. Vietnam was an unpopular war, but I think Iraq may be even more unpopular. There were also a bunch of lies surrounding Vietnam that were sold to the public by the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. No
Not really. If it had helped the Communist cause it might have then been taken as proof of the legitimacy of the "Domino Theory". Of course it was not the stepping stone to the ultimate in regional domination - which would be the occupation and subjugation of Australia and maybe New Zealand. Obviously neither happened and Communism has regressed as a major economic system in the world. With only Cuba, North Korea, and nominally China, now practicing Communism it is hard to say that our loss in Viet Nam was any sort of win for the other side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. But
did the Vietnam War galvanize support for the idea of Communism in other countries; did it act as a "recruiting officer" for communism in the same way the war on terror is doing for terrorism? Obviously it didn't work out to well for communism in the end, but did it get a boost at the time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moddemny Donating Member (400 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. "did the Vietnam War galvanize support for the idea of Communism....
.....in other countries"

Nope..... except maybe for a few che guevarra supporting flakes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Yeah, those crazy "Che Guevara supporting flakes"...
Edited on Sat Aug-20-05 08:13 AM by kiki
...if only Cuba had been allowed to continue living under the benevolent democratic rule of this guy: http://progressivewritersbloc.com/DC/FriendlyDictators.htm#Batista
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moddemny Donating Member (400 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #15
22. Two extreme wrongs.......
Edited on Sat Aug-20-05 08:40 AM by moddemny
don't make a right.

I'm sure cuba's poor a much better off with Castro that's why there are so many in Florida.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Well...
Edited on Sat Aug-20-05 11:58 PM by kiki
A lot of those who ran from Cuba were people who felt they "weren't free to make money". And Operation Northwoods spells out the US government's plans to blow up a couple'a boatloads of those patriotic souls for the sake of a "new Pearl Harbour".

The Cuban revolution wasn't about communism or capitalism, it was about Cuban nationalism: Cuba ruled by Cubans, for better or worse. Fidel's regime hasn't worked out too well - I'd like to see you run a country with the entire world striving to see you fail - but when the revolution was actually happening, those "Geuvara supporting flakes" made up the majority of the country.

Or perhaps you think a "tiny handful of extremists" somehow managed to seize control of the entire country, just like a "tiny handful of extremists" are resisting the occupation of Iraq right now...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moddemny Donating Member (400 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 06:52 AM
Response to Reply #23
27. When I mentioned flakes.........
...... I wasn't specifically talking about cubans, the comment was aimed at the "chic radical" che supporters and others who are so quick to point out the ills of the United States yet at the same time make excuses for marxist mass murder and thuggery. I realize sadly for the cubans that they were not totally in it for the marxist cause. Communists are good at funneling resentment and duping people into their cause. Cuba went from bad to worse. Castro coming to power for so long was a tragedy for Cuba similiar to fall of the Iron Curtain over Europe.



Fidel had plenty of support up until 1989 and the collapse of the Soviet Unions, enough to send troops on overseas expeditions in Africa to help the spread the fatal "revolution". Funny how quickly Communist utopias fall without outside support. The U.S. may not trade with Cuba but plenty of other countries do. It's not the first Communist regime to fall flat on it's face. If their systems were so great the countries of the Communist Bloc should have been able to survive independently of the west but once the Soviet Union fell it was the domino theory in reverse.


Operation Northwoods may have been planned by a few bad apples in the U.S. Government but it is something that never manifested while the ills of a totalitarian system created by Castro did. Your free to post about it here in America I wonder what would happen to someone like me who criticized Castro in Cuba? a trip to the "gaveta"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tocqueville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #6
25. and it galvanized an alternative society in Europe
it helped create a vast movement in Europe and the US. The difference in Europe was that it turned rapidly into a very leftist, maoist, trotskiist, anarchist movement (the hippies were in minority). That collapsed round 1975. But the impact was enormous

this was called the "May of 68" movement and the leaders and other followers became vey influent actors in society !

specially in the media (plenty of new media were created)
and in politics, some became VERY influent

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_May
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes, since Red China is now eating our lunch with Republican help LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Not Really
The China that is eating our ass alive is the new capitalist China. The war in Viet Nam was fought against the old, and still remaining part of China that was and is Communist. This is one of those rare times in history where an old economic (communism) system is gradually being replaced by a new (capitalism) without the aid of a change in the method of Governance at the same time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
etherealtruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Exactly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Red China is still 'red' last I looked. Most 'capitalist' enterprises
there are majority state owned. Just look at who owns CNOOC for that matter. What's that line from Lenin, capitalist will sell you the rope that you'll hang them with later ...

BTW, they call it socialism and even most other countries provide national support for their budding industries or agricultural products to some degree.

In the US we have so much concentration of wealth in the 'top' 1% that we are outsourcing and offshoring our way into being a 3rd world country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. The term then actually should be State Capitalism
which also was what the USSR largely was tending to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. No, you're confusing National Socialism with Fascism
in general. We do have a fascist system that gives lip service to individual rights but worships corporations and their money, which is why we're offshoring jobs and capital like crazy but ignoring the national effects of what the multinational corporations are doing to the country.

No 'state' benefits to this mess that I can see. BTW, my job was Bangalored awhile back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I meant China. I think.
I know we have no slightest socialist propensity here. The problem is that the fighting elements of the Left were eliminated here long ago with the connivance of the liberals like Hubert Humphrey which leaves the "Left" with only a polite and ineffectual bourgeois stratum. The system here must fall of its own weight as did Tsarist Russia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. You're right on the money. Sorry for the pun. Check the book
Wealth and Democracy by Kevin Phillips, hardly a 'fighting element of the left' btw, and you'll see that the concentration of wealth in the US is inexorably destroying democracy here.

Since the end of the Vietnam War, 1973 on, incomes have stagnated in this country and the wealthiest few have rigged the game against everyone else. As Phillip's book shows us, all economic empires fall when the concentration of wealth becomes too 'top heavy' (to steal a phrase from Edw. Wolff).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #11
21. Which we're witnessing right now
the economic collapse, the corruption of the whole GOP machine, the voter fraud, the alienation of all of our allies all point to a major non-peaceful overhaul in the near future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Intersting phrase. I've never heard that used to describe China before.
Things that make ya go hmmmmm... :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. No
but terrorism is a reaction or symptom of events and influences whereby communism was/is a system of governing. Apples and oranges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. You don't think Communism
was "a reaction or symptom of events"?

You think the Communist countries said "Hey, capitalism's an awesome cool system that's really doing a great job, but how about we try this instead, just for laughs"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goddess40 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
17. Please stop calling it communism - it never fit the definition
Why do we allow people to clean up their bad acts calling them something they aren't? Vietnam was a dictatorship as is current day China but we stick our head in the sand and let them call it Communism, the closest this world has seen to real Communism are Israel kibbutz's.

Communism doesn't have a ruling class, everyone benefits and everyone is equal.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
18. Ask yourself this question
If we had won that war would it have "defeated Communism"? I don't think so. So losing it didn't help communism either. If it had "helped Communism", as you put it, then China, Viet Nam, andn the USSR would be one big alliance by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
19. I think the religious overtones of Operation Flight Suit are
what have caused terrorism to grow so much. That and the fact that Iraq was basically defenseless, and that we've killed so many civilians. Operation I'm a War President has been a total disaster on every level except for Halliburton's bottom line - the world hates us, we are viewed as criminals, we're broke, Al Queda is healthy, emboldened and angry, we're as divided as we've ever been as a nation, we're LESS secure than we were before the war, and we LOST both wars - Iraq and Afghanistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
20. Are you asking if our Propaganda has gotten better?
It is all about Propaganda. If you believed what they said in the sixties how can you fit that belief into the 21st Century? Everything that was told this nation at that time has been proved false and I am sure the same is true now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tocqueville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
24. no but the Vietnam war showed that the US could be beaten
in a guerilla war where the sacrifice of millions doesn't matter

and the "war on terror" is initiating the same phenomenon again, different countries, same pattern


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bigmack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
26. Exact parallel....
I once told a freep-type that the Viet war gave aid and comfort to our "real" enemy... the Soviets and Chinese. They didn't lose anything of value, and they watched us bleed ourselves out and turn our country into warring camps... and laughed their asses off. The freeper's head exploded.

We're bleeding ourselves dry in Iraq, and the real enemy is laughing their asses of at us.

Both of them... wrong war, wrong time, wrong place, wrong enemy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
28. do some people still believe the VN war was about 'fighting communism'?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC