Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Santorum has lowest approval rating of U.S. Senators

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
flygal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 08:16 AM
Original message
Santorum has lowest approval rating of U.S. Senators
Edited on Fri Aug-19-05 08:19 AM by flygal
http://www.surveyusa.com/100USSenators0805SortedbyNetApprovalScore.htm

Lots of D's at the top. Lots of R's at the bottom.

And - MT's Burns up for reelection 06 is looking vulnerable - Woo Hoo!!
on edit - why the hell is Feinstein ahead of Boxer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
yodermon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. Barbara Boxer at 49% ??
:wtf: :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. 11 out of 14 with highest approval ratings are Dems...
Unfortunately, one of those is Lieberman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Lieberman has enjoyed much success in CT.
He has managed to get the tradition democratic vote, and has done well in the more conservative Fairfield county.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. there are a lot of "moderate" Democrats in Connecticut
The kind that are still reliably Democratic, but fairly moderate on many issues who don't mind a moderate Republican either - hence our RINO governor Jodi Rell has similar numbers to Lieberman, but is probably causing a lot of teeth nashing among RWers for her pro stem cell research, pro public financing of elections, and pro civil unions stands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. I found that most of the repub's in ct
were not the social conservatives that you find outside of the Northeast. They tend to be conservative only fiscally (ie tax cuts, etc.)

What is the general feeling about Rell. I left ct a year and a half ago after living there for 20 years. Has Blumenthal made any plans for running?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. Rell has the media in the palm of her hand still
I'm guessing Blumenthal will not run. If he ran, it would be a tough race for both him & Rell and Rell has been through some tough races with Rowland, while Blumenthal has always won comfortably as AG and may not be ready to for the meat grinder.

Rell has had a few problems, but she really has had an extended honeymoon. She came out in support of full public financing of all statewide elections, but it was 2 days before the legistlative session ended - so, she got great publicity for coming out in support of what is normally a Democratic issue, but she craftily left Democrats a very limited time to debate the issue. So, it died for this year & it made it look like it was the fault of Democrats.

The only thing she got a bit of negative publicity on was vetoing the bill to ban junk food from schools. She said the state shouldn't be in the nanny business, but the state already does a lot of similar things in schools, and the CT Republicans got a lot of money from Coke & Pepsi. However, I don't think you can run a campaign on banning junk food!

A few months back, she implemented a hiring freeze, but then hired a few "buddies" of hers for cushy part-time state jobs. That didn't register with the corporate media, though.... it was a small blurb in the Courant.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
3. I guess he isn't getting his message out
Hey, Ricky! Tell us more about women staying home to look after their husbands and kids, even if they don't want to. Tell us more about Massachusetts being the outer circle of Hell. Tell us about more about hot man-dog sex.

That should do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
etherealtruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. "...or is it that he DID get his message out?"
I need never hear about "hot man-dog sex," again. Never ever!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. With every statement he makes...
He outs himself as a wacko, way, way out of the mainstream.

Let him keep talking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
4. Maine seems to be getting.......
more Reich-wing all the time. I'm seriously concerned with those "down east". Why is there such a conservative stronghold in the otherwise progressive north-east? :shrug: It just doesn't make sense to me. I know it's not that big a populated state, but it makes the neighboring states look bad with that big red blotch sticking within them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burried News Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Very poor state - no educational opportunities - population
widely dispersed. An awful lot of poor folks leading hardscrabble desparate lives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. My guess is that its because there are major military bases and
Edited on Fri Aug-19-05 08:42 AM by tx_dem41
shipyards in Maine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burried News Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
6. Great Link - never saw this before.
Great to see Olympia Snow #1. A Rose among thorns.

Also like seeing Leahy and Rockefeller getting good numbers.

As for Ridiclous Sentorum - Nanana nanana hey hey goodbye.

PA ReThugs: Shell out some more pieces of silver and buy yourself a new model CONbot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Rick wants to lose, because he has ethical problem with dating employees
Once he's no longer senator, he'll be free to pursue a romantic relation with Bobby Traynor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalmonChantedEvening Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
11. LOL Great!!
If anyone deserves to be at the bottom, it's Saintwhorum.

(I'm guessing it's all Boston's fault) :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
13. Typical of these types of ratings
Moderates of both party do well because they do not alienate the other party (this is why Feinstein is ahead of Boxer and why Lieberman is so high, for example).

The other point is that pork has a lot to do with these ratings and typically senior senators are the ones who bring the pork.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
15. it's only temporary -
Katherine Harris will certainly overtake Santorum for that spot once elected
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
16. With the exception of two R's at the top - but here's the beauty:
They are what the wingnuts call RINOs. Probably the least Republican of all Republican senators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
18. Norm Coleman has 49% ?!?
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
19. Hey Ohio!
Lemme get this straight:

1) Your repuke senators are ranked 96 & 97 out of 100.
2) A sizeable majority of Ohioans disapprove of GWB as their Chimp-in-Chief.
3) Your repuke Governor just got convicted of taking "gifts" from soon-to-be-indicted slimebags.
4) Voters in the 2nd District just recently renewed their vows to the GOP by voting for sleazeball Jean Schmidt over Paul Hackett
5) You're bleeding jobs faster than Lance can pedal to the mailbox
6) The GOP machine in Ohio has been stealing money from its own citizens
7) Lastly, whacko repuke and professional bigot Ken Blackwell gets to screw you over and over again

Um... tell me again why Ohio keeps voting for Republicans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC