Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Republicans Kill Shumer Amendment for Independent Investigation-update

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 01:32 PM
Original message
Republicans Kill Shumer Amendment for Independent Investigation-update
Edited on Tue Sep-30-03 02:31 PM by Q
- Daschle up now in support of Shumer amendment. Says that Ashcroft can't be expected to offer an 'independent' investigation. "As we demand of others that WE respect the rule of law."


Schumer amendment: Expresses sense of the senate that law should be upheld in the leak of CIA employee's name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Schumer up now
Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Shumer is the sponsor...
...and Daschle is backing him up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
revcarol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. GO DASCHLE!!
I for one will never forgive the Bushies for comparing him to Osama...or was it Saddam...Keep up the good fight!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Schumer, Daschle and Boxer asking help from Republicans
Edited on Tue Sep-30-03 01:55 PM by Q
Shumer: To reveal a covert operative is a crime...not a leak. There's a crime committed here...a serious crime. What makes it worse is that it appears to have been committed in 'malice'.

Boxer: Something outrageous. Boxer wants to be added as co-sponsor to Shumer's amendment for an independent prosecutor. Mentions that the head of the CIA asks for an investigation. The fact is whether she was an agent or analyst is not the point....she was working 'under cover'.

- Boxer, Daschle and Shumer are making a strong case. They're urging the Republicans to put aside politics to see that justice is done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Pay attention people...the Senate is about to vote for...
...an Independent Prosecutor.

- Chances are it will be a 'party line' vote. Boxer says she will 'not let this go' even if it's voted down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. It is going to a vote - this fast?
Today? Wow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Listening to the debate now...
...not sure when they're going to vote on the Shumer amendment. Sounds like it's coming up soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Schumer Amendment:
Schumer amendment: Expresses sense of the senate that law should be upheld in the leak of CIA employee's name.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eileen_d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Well, if Repubs vote against that
Are they stating that they arbitrarily feel that law should NOT be upheld in this case? That would look pretty damn stupid. (Doesn't mean they won't still do it though :()
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonAndSun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Barbara Boxer said that if the repukes do not vote for this
amendment, then this "WILL become political". They will not let this go.


Go Barbara!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Hmmm
MY lame-duck Republican Senator already said that one was warranted, so I wonder what they'll threaten him with to get him to toe the line? Kill his dog? Kidnap his kids?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
10. we need a Democrat as partisan as Ken Starr
I'm sure it won't happen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sliverofhope Donating Member (858 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
12. I hope everyone called their sens/reps
We're gonna need it now. Oh please, can't we win just once?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brian Sweat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
14. The problem is that even if they vote to appoint an IP
they will not get a Democratic version of Kenneth Starr. They will get Kenneth Starr.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. But do the GOPers want to be on record as voting against it?
- Senator Durbin up now: calling for independent prosecutor' to investigate this very serious crime. The disclosure of 'such a person' can endanger lives. A decision was made within the Bush* admin to jeapordize this person and their career. Durbin is now talking about Nixon's enemy list...says this like his enemy list...trying to silence their critics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. Maybe we'll get lucky
I doubt any Repub thought that (Republican) Walsh would become such a single-minded son of a bitch in his pursuit of Bush and Reagan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonAndSun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
15. Dick Durbin is now on about the Indpt Counsel amendment
on the Senate floor. They are not going to let this drop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonAndSun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Durbin brought up Nixon's Enemy's List - WOW
says looks like bush* has one now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Go, Dick!
My Senator! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. I am hoping Robert Byrd will speak
I would love to hear what he has to say. I would also love to know who has signed on to co-sponsor this legislation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonAndSun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
20. Durbin talking about how he was investigated for an apparent leak!!
Durbin is pissed off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. He was investigated (and cleared)
And he ISN'T 'pissed'--- he's coldly FURIOUS! Hehehe! :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonAndSun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Yes, he is coldly FURIOUS and it is about time the Dems really
start kicking butt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Finally!
Someone voices doubts about Ashcroft's impartiality. Dick is pure gold!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Durbin for VP!
(Not the first time I've said it!) :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. He did it again
"...and I doubt Attorney General Ashcroft is up to the job." :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #32
50. Yay!
He savaged Asscrack in his confirmation hearings, and neither of them has ever forgotten it! :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. Whoa
He's using this to recite a litany of Bush's failings as president. Fantastic!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
25. Just got here
Are the Repubs still hiding with Cheney?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. The bunker better have rubber walls
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. LOL!
:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonAndSun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. Durbin just said the after bush's* speech about the $87B the
American people finally woke up!! He is bashing bush* big time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonAndSun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Now the repukes are up and are changing the subject to the DC
voucher bill. Idiots. Of course they do not want to talk about the Wilson affair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. Republicans have 58 minutes to 'debate' (oppose)...
Edited on Tue Sep-30-03 02:25 PM by Q
...this amendment and the Dems have about 8 minutes left.

- Reid of Nevada up now. Reid calling it 'retaliation' for Wilson opposing Bush*. "Loose lips sink ships". Says if we need a independent prosecutor to investigate 'land deal' then certainly this deserves the same attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonAndSun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
34. now Harry Reid D Nevada on now back on the Wilson issue!!
yeah, go Harry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emboldened Chimp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. 3 1/2 minutes for the opposition (that's us)!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Reid asks for 'up or down' vote...
...Republicans object.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonAndSun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. Reid wants an up and down vote on the amendment, not a point of order,
says American people deserve to know who wants the Indp Counsel and who does not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emboldened Chimp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
37. Point of order!
The pukes are going to block this. Traitors!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #37
42. Gregg (R)...
...has a 'lot of confidence' in the DOJ and FBI investigating.

- The AMENDMENT FALLS. Republican point of order: not germane.

- That's the end of it boys and girls. The GOP coverup continues.

- The debate changes to other issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
39. KKKarl is testing Senate R's
to be sure no vertabrae arise in place of the usual jelly.

Expect many weak knees, but there's a chance this could rain on their reelect. Any moderate R's up next fall? They better watch out.

Same thing happening with the media. It's time to come to Jesus, or lurk in the shadows. History is watching.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emboldened Chimp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
40. That's it! The ammendment was just killed!
ASSHOLE PUKES! I can't stand these guys any more. They are so obviously against democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. They just can't put down that bigger shovel.
They should be recalled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonAndSun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
41. Amendment just failed. No surprise there.
The Dems will be back on this. It will not go away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
44. so please somebody tell this confused simpleton here ....
Edited on Tue Sep-30-03 02:37 PM by ElsewheresDaughter
what happened???? did they deny the motion??? or was it posponed till 3:45 when schummer returns???

or is it all over...FAILED???
phuck me twice!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonAndSun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. We will have to wait unitl Schumer comes back at 3:45 to see what
he will do next. Not quite sure what will happen, but we do need to do this with every bill brought up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
45. Dems should do as Repubs do on judges and keep attaching this to every
bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
srpantalonas Donating Member (372 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
47. We'll start a petition
give us an hour...

btw--what was the vote count?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. There was no vote...or count...
...the Republicans objected that the amendment was not 'germane' to the bill it was attached to. That stopped the debate.

- I can't see how the Dems can get such a thing passed when there are so many RWing zealots in the Senate. GOPers in the senate do what's good for the Republican party...not the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eileen_d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
48. OK, Republicans do not support upholding the law.
That was not news to me, but it's going to be news to the next Republican I talk to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC