Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Breathless reportage"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 01:31 PM
Original message
"Breathless reportage"
The electronic media have congealed into a style that Don Henley sang about years ago in "Dirty Laundry." Every story has to carry some gee-whiz kind of importance with it, so that a viewer might imagine that after eighty-something days of her disappearance, some new angle about a possible witness to a missing teenager's actions is a desperately serious piece of information.

This sort of "breathless reportage" was probably pioneered by the local news stations and affiliates, because there was a steady supply of crimes, car wrecks ("Is the head dead yet?") and missing children, and because the news readers in local markets had a limited ability to deliver such news in a sober and believable way, but instead adopted this desperately serious histrionic tone.

Someone just noted that a recent explosion in San Francisco is getting this treatment. It's as if every story that's required to fill this insane 24-hour news cycle is something that will affect our lives and our country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Dirty Laundry has certainly passed the test of time.
It's as accurate now as it was then. Even more so.

And, yes, I'd agree that a lot of it has to do with filling 24 hours a day on several news channels. It also has to do with the fact that people want that kind of garbage. Otherwise, there wouldn't be 300 versions of Entertainment Tonight sprawled all over TV hell.

On a related note, it annoys the living hell out of me every time Wolf Blitzer says, "Quickly, 'cause we're out of time" or "in ten seconds, answer this complicated question, because we're almost out of time." CNN has so much time to fill that they'll never be "almost out of time."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. A great point. "We're almost out of time." What a crock.
Time is exactly what they've got tons of. What they don't have is journalistic courage, or a hunger for the truth. So they keep this false urgency going all the time, and then go the the commercial for yet another pain reliever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Another pain reliever, which we now need because of Wolf Blitzer!
:)

Hey, we're lucky if it's a pain reliever commercial. Usually, it's one of those incredibly annoying Levitra ads.

I'm not sure which is worse: Wolf Blitzer or Levitra commercials.

:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think Leslie Blitzer deserves an Academy Award
for his breathless reportage of the Swift Boat smears. He really worked to make it sound like news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. LOL... Beat me to it.
One of these days he is going to hyperventilate and pass out or have a stroke trying to deliver deliver his "exclusives" to the nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC