If the war had been quick and easy and gas was under $2.00 would the ...

[European Socialist]

public have come around. I doubt it. Bush is unpopular because he is doing badly, not because he is bad. But I'll take it anyway.

[Roxy66]

1. I completely agree..this is not about Dem/Repug in the end

Ultimately its about our prosperity.

[niallmac]

2. Oh absolutely!

I don't even like to think about how the majority could care less how many lives we ruin overseas with our phony wars. Hey, wait a mint. Gas is three fitty! ...bush is no girl scout! He's the Loch Ness Monster!

[leveymg]

3. Bush isn't even really any good at being a Bad Ass.

He's not even mediocre. Shrub's what can most charitably be called a Loser. Americans hate losers worse than they do villains.

I'll give him this much, however. He makes Abdullah a happy man.

[dogday]

4. We invaded an Oil Rich country and we

are paying the highest we have ever paid per gallon of gas? People are wondering what the world we are doing over there and why are we in so much debt over this war with nothing to show for it. I think those people though we would have an abundance of oil...

[Inland]

5. I'm missing the point of the question.

If Bush were doing a better job as president, he would have higher numbers. That's actually reassuring, in that it seems that job performance actually does make a difference, something not entirely clear after 9/11, when the very act of disputing the president was tantamount to treason.

[European Socialist]

6. I see your point....

My point is the public doesn't think the war was wrong, but it wasn't worth the price. It still concerns me they accept a preemptive war.