Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Homosexual marriage will lead to mono-gloved marriage

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 11:14 AM
Original message
Homosexual marriage will lead to mono-gloved marriage
Edited on Sat Aug-20-05 11:16 AM by Proud2BAmurkin
Roberts is a fucking lunatic.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/19/AR2005081901801_pf.html

Last week, researchers found several memos from the summer and fall of 1984 in which future Supreme Court nominee John Roberts, working as a Reagan White House lawyer, argued against sending presidential thank-you notes to Michael Jackson for his charitable works. But it turns out this was just the beginning of what appears to be the young lawyer's concerns about the star. Three new memos uncovered by Post reporters show Roberts described Jackson as "androgynous," "mono-gloved" and a balladeer of illegitimacy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Mono-gloved"???
:rofl:

The "stealth" is wearing off this guy pretty fast these days, isn't it?

What a loon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. doesn't it EVER occur to the lieberman's or clinton's
of the world that some people might spend a tad too much time thinking about certain things?

i mean that is pretty fuckin freaky -- what do some of these freakoids do all day -- have furious wank sessions over sex other people are having?

i just gave myself the shivers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I'm begining to think his nomination might not be inevitable
Liberals hate him.

Conservatives hate him.

I think he might lose an up-or-down vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. one can always hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. For Political Reasons he Makes All That Nominate Him
look really bad. I'd say his nomnation would be political suicide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
4. The republicans are the biggest perverts of all...
I mean, those people can't HELP but think about sex... all the time! I often find the most staunch republicans and the most fervent born-agains have a common thread, they are obsessed with sex. Perhaps they think that by having that Ken doll hair and corny clothes, and surrounding themselves with a flag or bible will help them ward off the sex faeries.

Mono gloved?

Roberts is a fright!!! He does NOT belong on the high court. Wonder if Bush bothered vetting this freak before he started grooming him for the job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Oh, Bush vetted him
You know he did.

He was looking for a whackjob no one knew anything about. Someone like Priscilla Owens was out because everyone in America knows she's nuttier than squirrel turds and really far to the right. But Roberts? He was only on the bench two years, he has no paper trail...guess he shouldn't have picked a former deputy to the solicitor general, huh?

Back to the comment about sex. PBD, you are so very right; the people who think most about sex are fundies. Who thinks the most about gay sex? Oh...Fred Phelps. Gay men don't spend as much time thinking about gay sex as Phelps does. (All you gay men check in here: do you spend as much time thinking about gay sex as Fred Phelps does? And if you do, how do you find time to work and buy food?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mongo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. Jesus wrote a blank check
is how these people think. Sin like hell on Saturday night, pray for forgiveness on Sunday.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
8. BLITZER Said This Showed "good common sense"
When he read off this item last week, he said, "Even back then, ROBERTS showed good common sense."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sallyseven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Blitzer is gay
A flaming gay. What a bad guy he is to act straight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. He Brags about Never Having Studied Journalism
Plus the cheap bastard's donation was what he would have charged his alma mater as a speaking fee---you can't miss what never entered your pocket.

And I realize that his being married to Lynn for 30 years doesn't prove anything, but...


*******QUOTE*******

http://www.buffalo.edu/UBT/UBT-archives/25_ubtw04/alumni_profiles/

.... "It's not as if journalism was a lifelong goal of mine. I did not work for the Spectrum. I did not work for the UB radio station. I never took any journalism courses either in undergraduate or graduate school. I just sort of fell into it after graduate school and, to my amazement, I discovered I had a knack for it." ....

His most recent donation is the gift of his speaking fee to UB's new Institute for Jewish Thought, an interdisciplinary center for the study of Jewish intellectual history. The gift will endow a lecture series at the institute to honor his late father, David Blitzer. Wolf Blitzer's wife of 30 years, Lynn, and his mother, Cesia, were in attendance. ....

********UNQUOTE*******

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
11. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
12. where are the log cabins now?
And why aren't they screaming holy hell?

Roberts is a knuckle-walker of the first order.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
14. 1984! MJ looked almost NORMAL back then!
I wonder what Robert thinks of him NOW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kweerwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
15. And yet Roberts has a history of cross-dressing ...
... well, OK, so it was to play the part of Peppermint Patti in an all-boys school production of "You're a Good Man, Charlie Brown," but it still raises eye brows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC