The war of one against all: The roots of our enslavement
by Herb Ruhs, MD, Unknown News
Aug. 19, 2005
Try and tell me you haven't seen this happen. You are sitting around with friends and acquaintances talking about some topic or the other, at a dinner party perhaps. Someone there is more articulate, better informed, and, I think understandably, more passionate about the topic.
Are the rest of the people in the discussion pleased at discovering this resource so close at hand? Not likely, unless the person is seen as a celebrity, as "other," as someone unlike the other guests by being seen, in some way, as being superior. More likely, if this person is seen as a peer, as a member of the class of people represented there, they will become the focus of negative metalanguage, dirty looks, interruptions, unnecessary and contrarian responses, and before long the "expert" is silenced or maybe just leaves early.
The same person can be invited to "give a talk" and in the discussion afterwards is equally distressed by sycophantic and superciliously fawning responses from an audience consisting, essentially of the same sorts of people who were so dismissive at the dinner party. In either case, real discussion with real give and take does not happen and needed learning does not occur.
So what is going on here? Why are we so eager to shoot ourselves in the foot this way? Why do we find it so hard to learn from each other, to share openly, to allow ourselves to be influenced by other, ordinary, people who just happen to have more access to knowledge and experience on a particular topic than we posses?
http://www.unknownnews.org/050819a-hr.html