Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

IF BY THE TIME WE LEAVE IRAQ

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Son of California Donating Member (467 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 05:43 PM
Original message
IF BY THE TIME WE LEAVE IRAQ
WOMEN HAVE LESS RIGHTS THAN THEY DID UNDER SADDAM.

THEN WE HAVE FAILED.
AND ALL THOSE BRAVE SOLDIERS WILL HAVE DIED IN VAIN.

Don't get me wrong, I thought this war was bullshit from the start, but since we totally fucked their country up, the least thing we can do is leave those people as free and democratic a country as possible.

WHY AREN'T WE SHOUTING THIS FROM THE MOUNTAIN TOPS!?!?!?!?!

WOMEN'S RIGHTS ARE BEING STRIPPED IN THE NEW IRAQI CONSTITUTION AND THE PRES IS PLAYING BALL WITH THEM ON IT.
FUCK THAT SHIT!

But from a less passionate stand-point, and from a more calculating one: Is there anything that could discredit the president more on the Iraq war than this? That women will actually be LESS FREE, LESS EQUAL now then they were under Saddam?
God, what I would give to hear people talking about this issue in the MSM or on the cable channels!
can we get a buzz going on this? Maybe this could the straw that finally broke the camels back?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is Ann Coulter gonna stand up and scream about this? WIll any RW
pundit, male or female, complain or express outrage?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntPatsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. We are shouting from the roof tops, it is just that your local televised
media channels are ignoring the outrage and instead are choosing to label those opposed to Cindy Sheehans stand against this administration to be patriotic individuals...

Can they be anymore blantant about thier obvious prejudice against any and all of those opposed to the lies coming from the white house?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. Dead right
particularly given the amount of back patting they have done about helping the rights of women.

Expect to hear reference to the rape rooms every time this subject is brought up.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. The right wing liars' latest deception is that Bush has freed Iraqi women
from their burkas. I kid you not. Bill Maher had Right-wing liar Kellyanne Conway on his show on Friday and she actually made this claim. Bill Maher responded by asking her, "Which asshole did you pull THAT from?"



Kellyanne Conway
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. Cindy is being watched.... and she needs to make a reference to
this fact, and that her son went to Iraq to help free Iraqi women... and that this is not the way it is turning out.

She should ask * if her son died so that these restrictions could be put on Iraqi women... just a thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Son of California Donating Member (467 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. you nailed it on the head!
can anyone get a hold of Cindy and ask her to bring this issue up next time she's got a camera on her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. Ah, see they got you to buy in!
Now you are willing to come to the table and discuss what criteria makes this unmitigated failure a success. They are clever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Son of California Donating Member (467 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. I agree that this war cannot be won in anyway
But I think that what you said is just partisanship to the max -the type of partisanship that does nothing to help anyone or anything.

I cry and I burn with anger sometimes thinking about the pointlessness and stupidity of this war and wish we would pull out right now, but I've accepted that Bush is not going to pull out, no matter how much the public and his fellow Repubs turn against the war -because the SOB is just crazy like that.

So if we are going to sacrifice all those lives for this shit, the least we can do is punk those knuckledragging monkeys writing this constitution and demand equal rights for women.

I'm not about to forget the ideals I live by just because I am pissed at Bush.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. It isn't about partisanship. It's about the fact that losing a war...
does not permit you to call the shots. We were not able to dictate to the North Vietnamese how they'd run Viet Nam when we left, and Iraq is no different. If liberals take the bait and say that this war has to go on until X, then it isn't going to end. We need to get out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. Bush brought theocracy to Iraq
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Are theocracies any easier to get to sell out their peoples'
mineral rights?? I don't think so. Major flaws in the PNAC agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I think theocracies are corrupt by nature
Edited on Sun Aug-21-05 06:56 PM by Solly Mack

so I think it will be quite easy for them to screw the people
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC