Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should the South have been allowed to peacefully secede?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 08:40 PM
Original message
Should the South have been allowed to peacefully secede?
Was that Lincoln's biggest blunder?

Is this not a suitable topic for discussion?

some say that's the case

I'm just sayin.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Do you like Europe?
We would have been multiple kingdoms, republics, tyrannies. Damn easy for a determined power to conquer.

So you tell me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. And remember, the people who advocate that policy
Are the same ones who believe the darkies were happy being slaves, because they sang and smiled so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Who, after the war of 1812, had the capacity to attack us?
and, yeah, I much prefer the Europe of today, in most cases, than I do what's going on in the US

except, of course, for their rotten health care, their rotten public transportation, their rotten cars that get about 40 mpg, their rotten safety net, their rotten food, their rotten refusal to fight phony wars, their rotten life expectancies==certain exceptions apply, but that's obvious

stuff like that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youngdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Can we secede? Form our own " nation"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrazyForKucinich Donating Member (676 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
48. I think the founding fathers would agree
They seceeded. Why can't we?

The Declaration of Independence basically says that when the Government turns radical something has to be done...our growing morality as a people(yes that sounds strange during these times) I believe would only leave us with the option to seceed peacefully. What is the USA going to do? Fire on its own people? That might have worked in 1860 but it sure the hell wouldn't work in 2005.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes, but with a negotiated settlement
I'd have voted for McClellan in 1864.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
growlypants Donating Member (846 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. HELL YES. And if the wanna go NOW.....
I'd let em. Dont they want their own "Christian Nation" or something scary like that??? Let em have it if they promise NEVER to come out of their designated area ever ever ever again. In fact, I'd build a WALL around their "Christian Nation." Oh, and no phone calls to the civilized world either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvetElvis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I believe the there are some in the south would have a different opinion.
How many times do we have to have this discussion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
growlypants Donating Member (846 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. I'm not saying everyone in the south is a nut or anything.
I was just saying that there is an actual group of people in South Carolina who want to suceed from the union and form their own christian nation. Sorry for any misunderstanding:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. there's a more publicized bunch of loons in Texas that are farther
along than the ones in SC

maybe after the Kinkster becomes govinator, he'll pull for secession
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
growlypants Donating Member (846 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. we can only pray. let the mexican have texas if it they want it.
They already have 3/4 of it anyway
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvetElvis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #15
25. Thanks. That's the nutty "exodus" group.
Those people are freaks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
22. southerners are not all GOP by any means
And as for this ->

>And remember, the people who advocate that policy

My people fought in the Civil War on the side of the Confederacy and not only did they not own slaves, they were the children of Scots-Irish slaves.

This was a far more complex matter than is possible to define with simple concepts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WorseBeforeBetter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. No! I'm moving to North Carolina soon! :-)
But I'd lop off Texas in a heartbeat. And it can take Oklahoma with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
castiron Donating Member (376 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. I have to say, as an Ohioan living in Texas,
that it would benefit this great nation of ours to make Texas "secede" at gunpoint and go it alone. They can take their cute vintage barbed wire antique plaques, rip off the barbes wire and use it to string along the northern border.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WorseBeforeBetter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #13
27. I'm with ya, but we'd have to save Austin.
I detest those obnoxious "Don't Mess with Texas" bumper stickers!

What's that cute little town near Dayton? Yellow Springs? I was stuck with an ex in Beavercreek for a while - not too thrilled with that area.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #13
32. No more Pace Picante Sauce for you, Yankee.
And turn in all your Dixie Chick CDs now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
growlypants Donating Member (846 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Hahahahahahahaha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NaturalHigh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
33. Everyone knows that all of us "Okies"
are toothless rednecks who vote the straight Republican ticket, right? It's nice to see your brand of "tolerance."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WorseBeforeBetter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #33
46. Based on the travel I've done in this country...
Edited on Sun Aug-21-05 10:44 PM by TWriterD
"toothless rednecks" abound in a great number of states - blue, red, purple, whatever. (Are you intolerant of toothless rednecks?) It's not my brand of tolerance or intolerance; I just don't particularly care for TX or OK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
34. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. Yep, it's deliberate flamebait.
Also tediously unoriginal, but I guess when one's intent is just to stir shit and turn people against each other, then anything will do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. Who is/ was Gabi Hayes
all I know the name from is an old George Carlin joke from 30 years ago about Gabi Hayes having whiskers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
47. Christian Exodus is based in California.
Just like Free Republic.

http://christianexodus.org/index.php?module=PostWrap&page=contact&POSTNUKESID=fcd32a7f69884dd1b32a609eee7f5d38

So much for the simpleminded bullshit that passes for political analysis around here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. Well, Bernie Ward at KGO wonders if it may have been better
He brings it up every once in a while on his nightly radio program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. he's an idiot then
i am a floridian and like living in the united states not the confederacy...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joemurphy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. The Civil War --
If it hadn't have been slavery, it would have been something else.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
10. the South would have eventually sunk under the economic weight of slavery.
Edited on Sun Aug-21-05 08:50 PM by cryingshame
you own slaves, and they're your prime source of labor, you have to at least keep them fed/clothed/healthy enough to work.

Having slaves reproduce isn't practical (mothers can't do field work).

Slave trade was expensive.

No, the south couldn't have kept their economy going. The northern industrial machine would have rolled over the south eventually.

the CW just sped things up.

Wage slaves were the next step in humanity's socio-economic evolution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Of course, but THEY pulled out. I wonder how long it would have
taken for your scenario to have taken place on its own.

if we'd just have done the old "hitcha/splitcha" with them.....oh well, one can always engage in wishful thinking

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
39. Eventually they would have been boycotted
over slavery. The rest of the world would have shut them down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knight_of_the_star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
19. Hindsight is 20/20
I don't think anyone in 1861 could have forseen keeping the nation together having the impact it has had 140 years down the line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BillZBubb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
20. NO!
Lincoln did the absolutely correct thing. It was vital to the United States that unhindered access to the Gulf of Mexico via the Mississippi be maintained. It was vital to the United States to maintain sovereignty over the western territories.

An independent Confederacy would have been a continued nuisance to the United States. There would have been a lot of border issues about fugitive slaves. There would have been property disputes. Loyal (to the United States) Southerners would have punished while the traitors would have been rewarded.

Lincoln's major problem was he wanted to be too nice to the defeated South. Sherman had the right idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #20
31. Actually Sherman had Lincoln's blessing and was a Reconstruction moderate
Leniency was the right way to close that chapter. Not an utter disregard for reform, as Andrew Johnson preferred, but forgiveness and reform.

Nelson Mandella's work in South Africa has a lot of parallels in Lincoln's program for the South.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastknowngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
21. I'm still up for it. Lets see how well they do on their own.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mntleo2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
23. I Say The North Should Secede To Canada
If we took our resources and money with us, we would immediately have universal health care, peaceful living, and a much saner government already in place, as well as a hell of a lot more land. We could invite any blue people in the south to come with us as well. In my state, there are pockets of reds and I would tell them to join the south and see how far they all get without us. IMO.

My two cents

Cat In Seattle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
24. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
NaturalHigh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
26. It's so "refreshing" to see the South bashed on DU.
Gee, we never see anything like that.:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Oh well, simple pleasures for simple minds. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
28. I would say yes
The south should have been left to peacefully secede.

Other than the mafia, you should be able to leave any group you join, preferably by the same means.

In this case, the states joined the Constitutional Republic with a vote of their state legislatures and left the same way.

So, let's put our soothsayer hats on and guess what the world would be like today.

First thing is it would be more advanced because there's no telling what great inventions, discoveries and pieces of art, literature and music were lost because 600,000 of our best educated people were killed in the war.

I think it is very likely that the two countries would have later reconnected.

Whether they did or didn't though, I don't think the world would be very diferent. Instead of having two friendly english-speaking democracies on North America, you'd have three.

If the Confederacy did remain independant, it would be far less powerful than the USA. It would be a regional power aimed at the Caribbean, maybe with the power of France, Italy or the Ukraine. New Orleans would be a world class trading city, the most important of the Gulf and Caribbean. Cuba would likely be a Confederate state.

Slavery would have been gradually ended about the time Brazil ended theirs -- maybe based on the Jamaican model, and maybe sped up by northern money.

Harry Turtledove would be writing what if books based on how the world would be if there had been a Civil War, and they'd be as implausable as his current ones are.

That's my guesses anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
30. Hell no. The Yankees kicked our asses and I for one am grateful for it
The country was won by the blood sweat and steel of all Americans and its bounty belongs to all Americans, including the descendents of all the Indians we killed and displaced (sorry about that, guys). To let one renegade band run off with the goods because they're the ones who happen to be sitting on it at the time makes about as much since as letting yhe Republicans keep the White House because they're the ones who happen to be sitting there when the voting machines get programmed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
36. I wish the northwest and the northeast could go to Canada
Much like Michael Moore's "United States of Canada" vs. "Jesusland" map.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
38. I have wondered this many times
Perhaps we should secede from the south now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvetElvis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
40. As far as I am concerned...
This type of thread solves nothing.
It's just a "paint the entire south with a broad brush and to hell with them". No real history is discussed, nor is it meant to. It's meant to bash residents of the south. Come on, you guys know that's true!
If history was going to be discussed, a more coherent argument would've been presented, as well as a logical discussion to follow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WildEyedLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. I love your username
:D

And yes, South/rural-baiting is as tiresome on DU as New England/yankee-baiting is on FR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NaturalHigh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. Many here just hate the South...
or anyone who doesn't live in the more "enlightened" areas. It burns me, but I've learned to accept that some people are just ignorant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #40
44. Yeah, it's hit 'n run flamebait.
Notice how our master baiter hasn't stuck around to discuss anything. Just pitch the turd into the punchbowl and run. I think I've seen that strategy before. Hmmm.

And why, I wonder, would someone want to cultivate division around here? Who could possibly benefit from that? Certainly not DU, Democrats, or progressives. Gee, this is really puzzling, isn't it?

Not.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
43. I Ain't Touching This, Tho I'm Being Severely Baited n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
45. Well, I wouldn't be able to read the words on this shiny magic thing...
in front of me, if those landowners and their peckerwood dupes had their way :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
49. Locking
This topic is and continues to be pure flamebait and acts as an open invitation for people to engage in South-bashing.

DU Moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC